Mangaluru, May 6: Postgraduate students of Mangalore University boycotted classes and staged a protest on the Mangalagangotri campus on Friday against the delay in announcement of results of examinations conducted four months ago and the “errors” in the results of some courses.
Sitting under the hot sun outside the science faculty building, the students said that though the university conducted the examinations of first and third semester courses in December 2015, the results of many courses had not been announced yet. The students would have to appear for the second and fourth (final) semester examinations by May-end.
They said that there could be about 2,000 students studying postgraduate courses. Going by the strength of students, the results should have been out within a month or one-and-a-half-months. It was strange that even after four months, the university was not able to announce the results.
A student studying English in the fourth (final) semester said that he would complete the two-year course after writing the examination by this month-end. He had already got job offer from a college as a lecturer. “They are insisting on producing the marks card up to three semesters. Now how can I submit the marks of the third semester as the result is not out,” he asked.
A student said that there were 10 students studying bio-technology on the campus. “Why the results have not been announced,” he asked.
For courses such as physics, it has been mentioned that the results are “to be announced later”. “The results of some students have been announced while for some others studying the same subject, it has been mentioned “to be announced later”,” the students said.
Never in history'
They claimed that never in the history of the university it had “withheld” the results of so many students by mentioning that to be announced later'.
A.M. Khan, Registrar (Evaluation), who arrived on the spot said that all the results would be announced by May 16. But the students did not listen to him and wanted an answer to other questions such as why the answer scripts did not have bar codes. When there was no convincing reply, the students marched towards the administrative building and staged a dharna demanding that K. Byrappa, Vice-Chancellor, should come to the spot. They withdrew the dharna only after the former Registrar (administration) P.S. Yadapadithaya approached the students twice and convinced that the office of the Registrar (Evaluation) would announce all the results by May 16.
Protesting postgraduate students of Mangalore University waylaid the car of Vice-Chancellor K. Byrappa when he was leaving the office from the administrative office for lunch in the afternoon. The Vice-Chancellor told the students that he did not come to meet them as “protocol” did not allow it. He said that all the results of would be announced by May 16 and left the spot in the car. The students protesting from 10 a.m. dispersed around 3.30 p.m.
Appeal
Meanwhile, Mangalore University authorities on Friday appealed to its postgraduate students not to panic about the results of odd semester examinations of postgraduate courses conducted in December 2015.
In a release on Friday, A.M. Khan, Registrar (Evaluation) said, “There has been a delay in the announcement of results due to the process of transition [from one contractor to another managing examination software]. Due care has been taken while announcing results as we did not want confusion as it happened in the undergraduate results. The delay has caused panic among students but there are no errors in the results announced.”
He said that a meeting of the chairpersons of postgraduate departments was called and it was resolved to finish the third evaluation process by May 16 and announce the full results. “Till date, 87.5 per cent of the postgraduate results are announced [41 out of 44 first semester and 36 out of 44 third semester results] on the university website. The remaining results will be announced soon,” he said.
Referring to “to be declared later” mentioned in the results of some students, he told the protesting students that the answer scripts of such students had been referred to the third evaluators. It was because if the difference of marks given by internal and external examiners was more than 20 per cent such scripts would have to be referred to the third evaluator which was final. Hence, marks of such answer scripts were awaited.

Comments
Add new comment