The Guidance of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) for a Plural Society

Muhammad Abdullah Javed
November 5, 2019

We often get involved in the discussion of right and wrong, right in terms of the values with which a society should be adorned with, wrong in terms of the evils that a society should be void of. This particular aspect of discussion seems common, it can be argued as and when required both for an individual and a group. For a plural society like India, this aspect demands seriousness. Priorities like prerequisites of the cultural plurality, communal harmony, human dignity, mutual co-operation, promotion of virtues and eradication of evils, the essence of leadership, the role of citizens etc. emphasize a humane approach.

The era of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) witnessed almost a similar kind of situation, a multicultural society with varied faiths and traditions. He (pbuh) addressed the core issues, established a peaceful society, prepared a huge group of believers and revolutionizes the Arabian Peninsula within a span of 23 years. The process expounds the dynamics of change for both individual and societal levels and provides with the requisites of guidance. It clearly states the dynamics of change for a plural society like India. Here is a relative discussion that compares the era of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) with the present one. Let us delve with its details.

Unity of Humanity

The crux of social destabilization was the degradation of humans; people were severely divided into different classes and categories. Lawlessness, causeless and bloody quarrels, immorality and skepticism was defining the social misery. 

Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) addressed these issues with a humanitarian concern and openly proclaimed unity of humanity, emphasized that there is no rank; color and race, all are just like a family of God. A person is good in the sight of God only if he is beneficial to human beings. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) moved further and elaborated the sacred nature of man that he has been created on the face of God; he is superior over all other creations, so any act of dehumanization is strictly unacceptable. Not to talk of human rights violation, even slapping on one’s face has been strictly prohibited. He greatly emphasized that honoring humans is just like honoring the God. 

The impacts of noble teachings saw a state of amaze, a sense of sacredness’. The unity of humanity got cultivated and paved the way for an overall involvement to live and strive together. It authenticated that the whole society is a vibrant composition of family members; everyone strives at all levels for the betterment, equally shares pains and gains and understands that the benefits and loses are interconnected. This zeal and selfless spirit tells a refurbishing story that they are, in real sense, not thriving for the society as a whole but for their household matters. 

The teachings of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) resulted in the restoration of human dignity, popularized the concept of brotherhood, minimized the causeless feuds between different sections of the society and put an end to all forms of disorders.

Association of Faith with the Conduct

For those who believed in Islam, the Prophet (pbuh) admonished them to be the epitome of ‘the idea of unity of humanity’, and associated their faith with the overall conduct. This has been one of the noblest facets that testify Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was raised for the whole mankind. According to his teachings, the pious are the ones who are of good conducts. That is, a person is a true Muslim only when he likes his brother what he likes for himself. A Muslim is good in the sight of God if he is good to his friends and neighbors, no matter who they are? A believer should be innocuous, simple and empathetic; his persona should be void of negative traits. 

Adherence to the teachings on religious tolerance regarded as an essence of high moral standards. Behaving well with the followers of different religions and not to scold their deities has been greatly emphasized. A letter given by Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), termed as “Charter of Privileges” to the St. Catherine Monastery is a clear indication, wherein very specific instructions were given to the Muslims of that region as to behave well with those who are not believers. For a true Muslim, even a misconduct of an insignificant nature poses serious threat to his faith.

Society of Soldiers

The spirit of a revolutionized society  maintained by developing every individual as its soldier, whose primary duty was to ensure a healthy balance between virtues and attitudes and eradicate everything that is harmful to the cause of society. The instructions of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) were just like an ‘open license’ to every person to be alert to strive for the annihilation of vices and be responsive towards the virtues to enjoin in accordance with their spirit. Lend helping hand to those who are engaged in promotion of virtues and eradication of evils. 

This task of promotion and eradication has been made obligatory, strict adherence of which regarded as a prerequisite of one’s faith. The Prophet (pbuh) categorically specified that any kind of negligence towards the task would simply adulterate the good deeds then even a single prayer won’t be accepted. As a result the society got adorned with pious persons about whom there was a common belief that they were like saints in the night and soldiers during the day time.

Visualization of such an exemplary society for the present age is possible only with a dual task of articulation and adoption of the ground-breaking features of that time. It is about ensuring a society where every member is a law abiding authority, very cautious for promotion of virtues and eager for annihilation of anything detrimental to the cause.

Leaders and Followers

Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) outlined the importance of effective leadership along with the leader-follower relationship for a prosperous society. For a leader few things were greatly underlined, that he is accountable and responsible for everyone, living and non-living being of his jurisdiction. It’s an obligation on him to strive hard for their betterment, with the same amount of enthusiasm and concern as he nurture for his own needs; else he won’t even feel the smell of Paradise. And that the leader in real sense is a servant, and he is supposed to benefit himself after serving his followers. The leader shouldn’t opt for the position, rather the masses, as a whole; elect him unanimously on the basis of his great characters, human loving and selfless service nature. 

The followers were advised to obey the leaders in every situation, no matter if the leader is of their choice or not. The relationship between the leaders and followers must have two common elements, mutual co-operation and humble prayers. Co-operation with regard to his promises and covenants and prayers to invoke the blessings of the Almighty to ease the leader’s task and make everything beneficial. These two elements, co-operation and prayers, help people become part of leader’s persona.

The values that the leaders and followers share define their relationships and roles; the society simply reflects the same. The greater the relationship greater will be the roles and even greater the scale of a prosperous society.

Common Programme

In a society wherein the plurality of faiths exists, the Prophet (pbuh) insisted on two things, one there should be deliberate attempts to exchange views, informations and commonness of the cultures. Everyone should try hard to communicate in a way that is better in all sense, with no blend of any element of compulsion and coercion. Secondly, He insisted on forming an association of followers of different faiths to strive for the protection of human rights, dignity and honor. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) had expressed his wish of joining hands with the followers of different religions for such a noble cause. 

The “League of the Virtuous” (Hilf-al- Fudhul) was a treaty formed during Prophet’s adolescence, He (pbuh) once said “the best part of my past life was spent in the activities of Hilf-al-Fudhul, that service has given me much honor and respect. I would not have stepped out of that agreement even if I were to be offered one hundred red camels”. (Biography of Ibn Hisham).

The Revival

India, after the independence, has progressed a lot. In spite of a healthy progress, we Indians, at large; seem to be involving ourselves in those things which are of less interest to the Nation as a whole. Look at the two contrasting faces; one, the silence and sectarian dwelling, we often find that the issues concerning a particular community, confined to its issues only, others barely find need of lending their helping hand. Secondly, no collective depiction of peace, unity, integrity, mutual co-operation and understanding has been ensured, not, atleast, as frequent and large as the destructive activities and corrupt practices take place. 

It’s a fact that our plural society is void of collective efforts of the followers of different religions. The situation appears quite alarming when we look at our Indian constitution that emphasizes our existence as “we the Indians”. Unarguably, there is a dearth of common program of betterment that in turned paved the way for the designs of divisive forces to create havoc. One of the main causes of worsening of social and economic conditions of our people is also the same. It’s high time that we should come forward to set an example of love, trust, honor and mutual-cooperation. 

This way India can strike a balance cord between material and spiritual progress and can be a great example of human honor and dignity. Religious understanding, blend of the commonness and collective struggle would do the magic. The message and teachings of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) could be sure cause of advancing the cause of a prosperous society and revival of the spirit of Unity in Diversity.

 

The author is the Director of AJ Academy For Research and Development, Raichur, Karnataka. He can be reached at [email protected]

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 23,2026

Karnataka Governor Thaawarchand Gehlot read only three lines from the 122-paragraph address prepared by the Congress-led state government while addressing the joint session of the Legislature on Thursday, effectively bypassing large sections critical of the BJP-led Union government.

The omitted portions of the customary Governor’s address outlined what the state government described as a “suppressive situation in economic and policy matters” under India’s federal framework. The speech also sharply criticised the Centre’s move to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) with the Viksit Bharat–Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Act, commonly referred to as the VB-GRAM (G) Act.

Governor Gehlot had earlier conveyed his objection to several paragraphs that were explicitly critical of the Union government. On Thursday, he confined himself to the opening lines — “I extend a warm welcome to all of you to the joint session of the State legislature. I am extremely pleased to address this august House” — before jumping directly to the concluding sentence of the final paragraph.

He ended the address by reading the last line of paragraph 122: “Overall, my government is firmly committed to doubling the pace of the State’s economic, social and physical development. Jai Hind — Jai Karnataka.”

According to the prepared speech, the Karnataka government demanded the scrapping of the VB-GRAM (G) Act, describing it as “contractor-centric” and detrimental to rural livelihoods, and called for the full restoration of MGNREGA. The state government argued that the new law undermines decentralisation, weakens labour protections, and centralises decision-making in violation of constitutional norms.

Key points from the unread sections of the speech:

•    Karnataka facing a “suppressive” economic and policy environment within the federal system

•    Repeal of MGNREGA described as a blow to rural livelihoods

•    VB-GRAM (G) Act accused of protecting corporate and contractor interests

•    New law alleged to weaken decentralised governance

•    Decision-making said to be imposed by the Centre without consulting states

•    Rights of Adivasis, women, backward classes and agrarian communities curtailed

•    Labourers allegedly placed under contractor control

•    States facing mounting fiscal stress due to central policies

•    VB-GRAM (G) Act accused of enabling large-scale corruption

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 23,2026

Mangaluru: The Karnataka Government Polytechnic (KPT), Mangaluru, has achieved autonomous status from the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), becoming the first government polytechnic in the country to receive such recognition in its 78-year history. The status was granted by AICTE, New Delhi, and subsequently approved by the Karnataka Board of Technical Education in October last year.

Officials said the autonomy was conferred a few months ago. Until recently, AICTE extended autonomous status only to engineering colleges, excluding diploma institutions. However, with a renewed national focus on skill development, several government polytechnics across India have now been granted autonomy.

KPT, the second-largest polytechnic in Karnataka, was established in 1946 with four branches and has since expanded to offer eight diploma programmes, including computer science and polymer technology. The institution is spread across a 19-acre campus.

Ravindra M Keni, the first dean of the institution, told The Times of India that AICTE had proposed autonomous status for polytechnic institutions that are over 25 years old. “Many colleges applied. In the first round, 100 institutions were shortlisted, which was further narrowed down to 15 in the second round. We have already completed one semester after becoming an autonomous institution,” he said. He added that nearly 500 students are admitted annually across eight three-year diploma courses.

Explaining the factors that helped KPT secure autonomy, Keni said the institution has consistently recorded 100 per cent admissions and placements for its graduates. He also noted its strong performance in sports, with the college emerging champions for 12 consecutive years, along with active student participation in NCC and NSS activities.

Autonomous status allows KPT to design industry-oriented curricula, conduct examinations, prepare question papers, and manage academic documentation independently. The institution can also directly collaborate with industries and receive priority funding from AICTE or the Ministry of Education. While academic autonomy has been granted, financial control will continue to rest with the state government.

“There will be separate committees for examinations, question paper setting, boards of studies, and boards of examiners. The institution will now have the freedom to conduct admissions without government notifications and issue its own marks cards,” Keni said, adding that new academic initiatives would be planned after a year of functioning under the autonomous framework.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com news network
January 19,2026

rizwanzameer.jpg

Bengaluru: As the dust settles on the recent legislative session, the corridors of Vidhana Soudha are buzzing with more than just policy talk. A high-stakes game of political musical chairs has begun, exposing a deepening rift within the Congress party’s Muslim leadership as a major Cabinet reshuffle looms.

With the party hierarchy signaling a "50% refresh" to gear up for the 2028 Assembly elections, the race to fill three projected Muslim ministerial berths has transformed from a strategic discussion into an all-out turf war.

The "Star Son" Spark

The internal friction turned public this week following provocative remarks by Zaid Khan, actor and son of Wakf Minister Zameer Ahmed Khan. Zaid’s claim—that his father "helped" secure a ticket for Shivajinagar MLA Rizwan Arshad in 2023—has acted as a lightning rod for resentment.

Rizwan’s camp was quick to fire back, dismissing the comment as a desperate attempt by Zameer to manufacture seniority. "Rizwan’s political pedigree was forged in the NSUI and Youth Congress long before Zameer even stepped into the party," a supporter noted, highlighting Rizwan’s tenure as an AICC secretary and his two-term presidency of the State Youth Congress.

A Tale of Two Loyalists

While both Zameer Ahmed Khan and Rizwan Arshad are staunch allies of Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and represent Bengaluru strongholds, their political DNA could not be more different:

•    Zameer Ahmed Khan: A four-time MLA who crossed over from JD(S) in 2018. Known for his "overzealous" and often polarizing outreach during communal flashpoints—from the DJ Halli riots to the recent Wakf land notice controversy—his style has frequently left the Congress high command in a state of "discomfort."

•    Rizwan Arshad: A homegrown organizational man. Seen as a "quiet performer," Arshad represents the sophisticated, moderate face of the party, preferred by those who find Zameer’s brand of politics too volatile.

The Outsiders Looking In

The bickering isn't limited to a duo. The "Beary" community, represented by leaders like N A Haris and Saleem Ahmed, is demanding its pound of flesh. Saleem Ahmed, the Chief Whip in the Legislative Council, has dropped the veil of diplomacy, openly declaring his ministerial aspirations.

"I was the only working president not included in the Cabinet last time," Saleem noted pointedly, signaling that the "loyalty quota" is no longer enough to keep the peace.

As Chief Minister Siddaramaiah prepares to finalize the list, he faces a delicate balancing act: rewarding the aggressive grassroots mobilization of Zameer’s camp without alienating the organizational stalwarts and minority sub-sects who feel increasingly sidelined by the "Chamarajpet-Shivajinagar" binary.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.