Muslims in air force can't sport beards: Supreme Court

December 16, 2016

New Delhi, Dec 16: Beards are not a universal requirement in Islam, and Muslims in the Indian Air Force can't flout the service rule on shaving, the Supreme Court has said.

AirForce
A three-member bench headed by Chief Justice T S Thakur confirmed the sacking of an airman, who had refused to shave off his beard despite a disciplinary notice.

Maintaining that discipline and uniformity are of paramount importance in the IAF, the bench, also comprising Justices D Y Chandrachud and L Nageswara Rao, observed the tenets of Islam do not prohibit cutting of hair or shaving of the face, as in the case of Sikhs.

Ansari Aaftab Ahmed and Mohammed Zubair, recruited as airmen, were sacked for growing beards even after they were denied permission.

They claimed it was a fundamental right to freedom of religion. The IAF countered their plea, saying beards were not universally recognised in Islam.

According to a 2003 defence ministry notification, only those Muslims who sported beards and moustaches at the time of commissioning (prior to January 1, 2002) could retain them. The court noted uniformity of personal appearance was essential to a cohesive, disciplined and coordinated functioning of an armed force.

“Every armed force raised in a civilised nation has its owndress and deportment' policy. Evidently, these provisions have been introduced having due regard to the security concerns inherent in maintaining identity in the armed forces,” it said.

Not a right

The bench said India was a secular nation in which every religion had to be treated equally, but at the same time, “the overarching necessity of a force... raised to protect the nation is to maintain discipline”.

The court saw no reason to interfere in the air force regulations and policies. Under the 2003 regulations, only Sikhs are allowed to sport unshorn hair and wear turbans, while others are required to obtain a permission to grow beards.

Comments

zakir
 - 
Sunday, 18 Dec 2016

In fact beard is the identity of every muslim (Sunnah of Prophet PBUH). Unfortunatly muslim fond of western culture or following film stars, boxer, etc etc.. some case wife does not need any different in her face and her husband.. some muslim scared even to follow the sunnah...

Naren kotian
 - 
Saturday, 17 Dec 2016

Sikhs are patriotic community and never back stabbed India. ..like druze community in Israel ...their reps in army is 17% ..which is 3 times more than their population ....there Is a reason why govt don't allow under secular rules is during partition ...bearded community back stabbed India ....India had committed mistake by forming their community regiment ....no double standard ...high time exit doors must be shown to jihadist ....obba mama heltavne ...avnu army bittu bandu yenanno tolkondu avnsnthe ....middle nalle army bittu bandre it means disciple follow madade iddudakke odsidaare ...

HOnest
 - 
Saturday, 17 Dec 2016

When people are going GODLESS they are deceived that they are the one who create life in this earth... and they can do whatever they like...
It their FOOLISHNESS and they are digging their own dark Graves....
Divine religion says YES to beard and the opposite will decline it... If U really have faith in ALLAH U will stick and live your job, cos we believe ALLAH is the creator of all that exists and in times of trials , we should be in patience... Leave your job ... Allah will give u a better job.. in-Shaa ALLAH. (Y im saying this is bcos ... I experienced the same , I left my job cos of the same reason but I have better job with triple the salary - ALHAMDULLILLAH Thanks to ALLAH)

DOOR WAY TO HE…
 - 
Friday, 16 Dec 2016

gud decision,,,,,,it is not compulsory....for sardars it is compulsory,,,u can look at Barack Obama he does not have beard.....whereas Manmohan has it.......lol

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
December 7,2025

SHRIMP.jpg

Mangaluru, Dec 7: A rare bamboo shrimp has been rediscovered on mainland India more than 70 years after it was last reported, confirming for the first time the presence of Atyopsis spinipes in the country. The find was made by researchers from the Centre for Climate Change Studies at Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, during surveys in Karnataka and Odisha.

The team — shrimp expert Dr S Prakash, PhD scholar K Kunjulakshmi, and Mangaluru-based researcher Maclean Antony Santos — combined field surveys, ecological assessments and DNA analysis to identify the elusive species. Their findings, published in Zootaxa, resolve decades of taxonomic confusion stemming from a 1951 report that misidentified the species as Atyopsis moluccensis without strong evidence.

The shrimp has now been confirmed at two locations: the Mulki–Pavanje estuary near Mangaluru and the Kuakhai River in Bhubaneswar. Historical specimens from the Andaman Islands, previously labelled as A. moluccensis, were also found to be misidentified and actually belong to A. spinipes.

The rediscovery began after an aquarium hobbyist in Odisha spotted a shrimp in 2022, prompting systematic surveys across Udupi, Karwar and Mangaluru. Four female specimens were collected in Mulki and one in Odisha, all genetically matching.

Researchers warn the species may exist in very small, vulnerable populations as freshwater habitats face increasing pressure from pollution, sand mining and infrastructure development. All verified specimens have been deposited with the Zoological Survey of India for future reference.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
December 15,2025

Udupi, Dec 15: What was meant to be a post-pilgrimage gathering turned tragic in Padukere village of Brahmavar taluk, Udupi district, late Sunday night, when a clash among youths escalated into a fatal assault, leaving one man dead.

The victim has been identified as 30-year-old Santosh Mogaveera, a resident of Padukere.

According to preliminary information, the incident took place during a late-night drinking party involving a group of local youths who had recently returned after completing their pilgrimage to the Sabarimala shrine. An argument reportedly broke out among the group and soon escalated into a violent confrontation.

During the ensuing brawl, Santosh Mogaveera was allegedly assaulted and collapsed at the spot after sustaining serious injuries. He was rushed by local residents to a private hospital in Brahmavar, where doctors declared him dead.

On receiving information, senior police officials, including Brahmavar Circle Inspector Gopikrishna, Kota Police Sub-Inspector Praveen Kumar T, Station ASI Manthesh Jabagoudar, and head constables Pradeep and Ashok, visited the spot and conducted an inspection.

Police have taken four youths into custody in connection with the incident. A case has been registered at the Kota police station, and further investigation is underway to ascertain the exact sequence of events leading to the death.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
December 4,2025

Mangaluru: Chaos erupted at Mangaluru International Airport (MIA) after IndiGo flight 6E 5150, bound for Mumbai, was repeatedly delayed and ultimately cancelled, leaving around 100 passengers stranded overnight. The incident highlights the ongoing country-wide operational disruptions affecting the airline, largely due to the implementation of new Flight Duty Time Limitations (FDTL) norms for crew.

The flight was initially scheduled for 9:25 PM on Tuesday but was first postponed to 11:40 PM, then midnight, before being cancelled around 3:00 AM. Passengers expressed frustration over last-minute communication and the lack of clarity, with elderly and ailing travellers particularly affected. “Though the airline arranged food, there was no proper communication, leaving us confused,” said one family member.

An IndiGo executive at MIA cited the FDTL rules, designed to prevent pilot fatigue by limiting crew working hours, as the cause of the cancellation. While alternative arrangements, including hotel stays, were offered, about 100 passengers chose to remain at the airport, creating tension. A replacement flight was arranged but also faced delays due to the same constraints, finally departing for Mumbai around 1:45 PM on Wednesday. Passengers either flew, requested refunds, or postponed their travel.

The Mangaluru delay is part of a broader crisis for IndiGo. The airline has been forced to make “calibrated schedule adjustments”—a euphemism for widespread cancellations and delays—after stricter FDTL norms came into effect on November 1.

While an IndiGo spokesperson acknowledged unavoidable flight disruptions due to technology issues, operational requirements, and the updated crew rostering rules, the DGCA has intervened, summoning senior airline officials to explain the chaos and outline corrective measures.

The ripple effect has been felt across the country, with major hubs like Bengaluru and Mumbai reporting numerous cancellations. The Mangaluru incident underscores the systemic operational strain currently confronting India’s largest carrier, leaving passengers nationwide grappling with uncertainty and delays.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.