Bengal CM's ire spills over to 'mystery' ops

December 3, 2016

Kolkata, Dec 3: Mamata Banerjee left Nabanna at 6.20pm on Friday, after spending 30 hours and 14 minutes in the CMO, easily the longest time a Bengal chief minister has spent at the government headquarters since 1977. An hour earlier, around 5pm, the last of the Army trucks accused of "surveillance" by the Bengal government left its toll booth posting at Ghoshpukur in Jalpaiguri, about 600km away.

bengal
The two withdrawals on Friday marked the end of only the first act of a drama that started unfolding 10 days ago, on November 23, with an innocuous letter from the defence ministry to the officer-in-charge of the Hastings police station. The exchange of angry words in New Delhi and Kolkata and two trending hashtags #MamataCoupCharge #MamataAgainstNation indicate no one has seen the end of the "routine affair" undertaken by the Indian Army every year.

The CM's marathon and unprecedented digging-in at the state secretariat, Trinamool leaders agreed, revealed how Delhi-Kolkata politics was moving into the realm of the unknown. No Bengal CM has said what Banerjee said on Thursday and Friday, when she accused the Centre of "using the Army against our (Bengal) government", which prompted Union minister Ananth Kumar to request Trinamool Lok Sabha leader Sudip Bandyopadhyay "to leave the Indian Army out of politics".

The truth, as often in politics, might lie somewhere in between and in the interpretation of whether "intimation" is the same as "permission". The letters from the Army, issued to various state government agencies starting from November 23, indicate that it had "intimated" the state government about its intent to conduct the annual exercise of monitoring the movement of heavy vehicles on National Highways. But the state government said the Army did not obtain "permission" to conduct the exercise and rushed into it; law and order was very much a state government domain, seniors in the government said.

On Thursday, the CM had said that the Army was deployed without informing her government and had announced that she would stay put at Nabanna till "the Army withdrew from the state". State parliamentary affairs minister Partha Chatterjee on Friday modified the charge somewhat when he said: "The Army hadn't taken prior permission from the state government, which they should have because law and order comes under the state's domain."

There is no official document available with the Army to show that the state gave its consent. On the contrary, chief secretary Basudeb Banerjee wrote to the Union cabinet secretary on December 1, taking exception to the "vehicle impressment exercise" conducted by the Army at Vidyasagar Setu toll plaza less than a kilometre from Nabanna. "This is highly objectionable," Banerjee wrote.

But Army claimed that came as a surprise because Army personnel conducted a joint reconnaissance with two inspectors of Kolkata Police at Vidyasagar Setu on November 27. "We mutually identified the locations and telephonically conveyed that the issue had been resolved. This is how we conducted the exercise," officiating GoC, Bengal area, Sunil Yadav, said.

But that joint inspection came two days after additional commissioner of police (III) Supratim Sarkar wrote to the Army, advising against taking up the exercise at that spot because of the "huge traffic volume and its proximity to the state secretariat". The Army postponed the exercise to November 30, changing its earlier plan to carry out the exercise on December 28, following requests from Kolkata Police because of the strike call for November 28.

Army also referred to the similar exercise in Bengal last year and in Jharkhand, UP and Bihar this year.

The CM, however, insisted that the Army overstepped its brief. "The Army intimated the police about the exercise at only Vidyasagar Setu but not for the activities elsewhere in the state. Army personnel were deployed afresh across the state when I was at Nabanna. The matter went up to Parliament and the government's reply is misleading, full of misinformation and disinformation. It's a concocted story. I would like to thank members of the opposition who backed our cause in Parliament. It has happened in Bengal because we are with the people. A total 82 lives have been lost after demonetisation," the CM said before leaving her post on Friday.

Earlier, Trinamool legislators staged a dharna in front of Raj Bhavan.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 14,2024

modirangeela.jpg

Comedian Shyam Rangeela on Tuesday that he was barred from filing his nomination papers for the 2024 Lok Sabha Elections. He intended to challenge Prime Minister Narendra Modi from the Varanasi seat by contesting as an Independent candidate.

Despite attempts to file his papers since May 10, Rangeela alleged he was denied entry to the district magistrate's office on the day Prime Minister Modi filed his nomination. He also said that he is not taking any team from Sriganganagar to contest the Lok Sabha elections in Varanasi. 

Shyam Rangeela further claimed that he has received several phone calls from Varanasi and people are willing to join him. "Winning or losing is a different matter, but I will contest the elections against the Prime Minister at any cost. I am not contesting elections to become famous, I am already very famous among the public."

The Congress party also waded into the controversy. Congress leader Surendra Rajput told news agency PTI that everyone is free to file a nomination including Prime Minister Modi. Rajput claimed that Rangeela was not getting nomination papers from the administration. 

"Everyone is free to file a nomination including PM Modi. However, other people are not allowed to file their nominations from the constituency. A YouTuber named (Shyam) Rangeela, who wished to file a nomination from Varanasi, isn’t getting nomination papers from the administration. Why PM Modi is afraid of people? Let them contest against you," he said. 

PM Modi, contesting for a third term, previously won the Varanasi seat by 4.8 lakh votes in 2019 and by 3.72 lakh votes in 2014. So far, 14 individuals, including mainstream political party candidates and independents, have filed their nominations for the Varanasi constituency.

Congress candidate Ajai Rai and Bahujan Samajwadi Party's Athar Ali Lari are among them. Rangeela, a YouTuber and mimic from Rajasthan’s Hanumangarh, rose to fame in 2017 with his act impersonating PM Modi. He has been critical of the Prime Minister and his policies, as evident in his videos.
 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 8,2024

sampitroda.jpg

Congress leader Sam Pitroda has stepped down from the post of Chairman of the Indian Overseas Congress and his resignation was accepted by the party. Congress leader Jairam Ramesh took to X and announced that Sam Pitroda had decided to resign from the key post "of his own accord".

Pitroda had been under fire over his controversial remark that Indians in the East resemble the Chinese while those in the South look like Africans.

"We could hold together a country as diverse as India -- where people on East look like Chinese, people on West look like Arab, people on North look like maybe White and people in South look like Africans. It doesn't matter. We are all brothers and sisters," Pitroda said during an interview with The Statesman.

The Congress immediately distanced itself from Pitroda's remarks, terming them "unacceptable".

"The analogies drawn by Mr Sam Pitroda in a podcast to illustrate India's diversity are most unfortunate and unacceptable. The Indian National Congress completely dissociates itself from these analogies," Jairam Ramesh said in a post on X.

The BJP also hit out at the Congress over Pitroda's remarks and termed them "racist and divisive".

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
May 10,2024

AKejrival.jpg

The Supreme Court Friday granted interim bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal till June 1 in the excise policy case.

The top court, however, stated that it will be passing a detailed order over the matter soon.

On Thursday, the Enforcement Directorate had opposed the move to grant interim bail to Kejriwal saying that “any special concession” to him will “amount to anathema to the rule of law and equality… thereby creating two separate classes in the country viz. ordinary people, who are bound by the rule of law as well as the laws of the country, and politicians who can seek exemption from the laws”.

The ED had arrested Kejriwal on March 21 in the excise policy case.

“The right to campaign for an election is neither a fundamental right nor a constitutional right and not even a legal right,” the ED said, maintaining that to its knowledge, “no political leader has been granted interim bail for campaigning even though he is not the contesting candidate”.

After the ED filed its affidavit, the AAP, in a press release, said, “The legal team of Delhi Chief Minister and AAP National Convenor, Shri Arvind Kejriwal, has raised strong objection to the affidavit filed by the Enforcement Directorate opposing interim bail in the Supreme Court.”

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.