Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash an investigation against a WhatsApp group administrator accused of allowing the circulation of obscene and offensive images depicting Hindutva politicians and idols in 2021.
Justice M Nagaprasanna observed that, prima facie, the ingredients of the offence under Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code were made out. “The offence under Section 295A of the IPC is met to every word of its ingredient, albeit prima facie,” the judge said.
The petitioner, Sirajuddin, a resident of Belthangady taluk in Dakshina Kannada district, had challenged the FIR registered against him at the CEN (Cyber, Economics and Narcotics) police station, Mangaluru, for offences under Section 295A of the IPC and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act. Section 295A relates to punishment for deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage the religious feelings of any class of citizens.
According to the complaint filed by K Jayaraj Salian, also a resident of Belthangady taluk, he received a WhatsApp group link from an unknown source and was added to the group after accessing it. The group reportedly had six administrators and around 250 participants, where obscene and offensive images depicting Hindu deities and certain political figures were allegedly circulated repeatedly.
Sirajuddin was arrested in connection with the case and later released on bail on February 16, 2021. He argued before the court that he was being selectively targeted, while other administrators—including the creator of the group—were neither arrested nor investigated. He also contended that the Magistrate could not have taken cognisance of the offence under Section 295A without prior sanction under Section 196(1) of the CrPC.
Rejecting the argument, Justice Nagaprasanna held that prior sanction is required only at the stage of taking cognisance, and not at the stage of registration of the crime or during investigation.
The judge noted that the State had produced the entire investigation material before the court. “A perusal of the material reveals depictions of Hindu deities in an extraordinarily obscene, demeaning and profane manner. The content is such that its reproduction in a judicial order would itself be inappropriate,” the court said, adding that the material, on its face, had the tendency to outrage religious feelings and disturb communal harmony.
Observing that the case was still at the investigation stage, the court said it could not interdict the probe at this juncture. However, it expressed concern that the investigating officer appeared to have not proceeded uniformly against all administrators. The court clarified that if the investigation revealed the active involvement of any member in permitting the circulation of such content, they must also be proceeded against.
“At this investigative stage, any further observation by this Court would be unnecessary,” the order concluded.
Comments
Assalamu Alaikum ,I take the approval federal authority of identity and citizenship by other service individuals,i pay for it request number is ( 0101068112262020339886952 on 10nov 2020for Ica approval but that approval is not acce shown pt at airport on 25nov 2020.I want to no the reason why it's happened,of approved than y not shown in system.from last 2month I am facing this problem and always show after 60day. this big joke really very bad.id784197031742428
Assalamu Alaikum ,I take the approval federal authority of identity and citizenship by other service individuals,i pay for it request number is ( 0101068112262020339886952 on 10nov 2020for Ica approval but that approval is not acce shown pt at airport on 25nov 2020.I want to no the reason why it's happened,of approved than y not shown in system.from last 2month I am facing this problem and always show after 60day. this big joke really very bad.id784197031742428
Assalamu Alaikum ,I take the approval federal authority of identity and citizenship by other service individuals,i pay for it request number is ( 0101068112262020339886952 on 10nov 2020for Ica approval but that approval is not acce shown pt at airport on 25nov 2020.I want to no the reason why it's happened,of approved than y not shown in system.from last 2month I am facing this problem and always show after 60day. this big joke really very bad.id784197031742428
I have valid UAE VISA .now I come in india that time green signal .Now I checked res signal . please as soon as possible make green signal
I have valid UAE VISA .now I came in india that time green signal. Now I checked red signal .pls as soon as possible make green signal.
Add new comment