Cow Slaughter in Haryana: Prison term in state may go up to 10 years!

March 14, 2015

Chandigarh, Mar 14: The anti-cow slaughter bill mulled by the BJP government in Haryana may have a provision of imprisonment of up to ten years. In the proposed ‘Govansh Sanrakashan and Gau Samvardhan’ (Cow Protection and Cow Conservation and Development) Bill’ efforts will be made to have tough law on cow slaughter and for conservation and better care of indigenous cattle, Haryana’s Health Minister, Anil Vij said today.

While Vij did not elaborate on the penal provision under the proposed law as the Bill is yet to be introduced in the Assembly, a senior official, who did not wished to be named, said that under the present law, there is provision of five years rigorous imprisonment.

Manohar Lal Khattar

“We are examining it now,” he said, indicating that the new provisions could invite imprisonment up to ten years, though he added the final call on the issue is in the domain of the Haryana Assembly, which will take a decision on the final outcome of the Bill.

Capital punishment for cow slaughter was unlikely, he said when asked to comment on some reports in this regard. Earlier, reacting to opposition in some quarters to BJP government’s proposed Bill, Health Minister Vij sparked a fresh row saying “tomorrow, will we also have to keep in mind the sentiments of those who will say they have become cannibals?”

“Some people who are against our move to bring in tough law against cow slaughter want that sentiments of those who consume beef be kept in mind. “Tomorrow, if someone becomes habitual of eating human flesh, will we have to also keep in mind their sentiments as well?” Vij, the outspoken BJP leader, told reporters.

He also posted his views on his Twitter handle, circulated it on Whatsapp and posted his views on Facebook. Vij, the Ambala Cantt MLA, said the Manohar Lal Khattar government was committed to strict law on cow slaughter. He said it is not that Haryana did not have provisions in law for this earlier. But the old law was found lacking, which is why the present government wants to bring a new law.

“We want to have a proper and strong law so that no one indulges in cow slaughter or sells its meat,” he said. He said that the state is all set to introduce a Bill in the Assembly for “protection and upkeep” of cows. The budget session of the state Assembly began here on Monday and is scheduled to continue till March 25.

In the proposed ‘Cow Protection and Cow Conservation and Development Bill’, efforts will be made to have tough law on cow slaughter and for conservation and better care of indigenous cattle, Vij said, without elaborating what tough provisions will be there in the proposed law.

Asked if the move was part of BJP’s plan to implement its “Hindutva agenda”, Vij said that whatever the government intends to do now was very much part of its election manifesto. “People accepted this and gave us their support, now it is the government’s duty to implement this and have a law in place,” he said.

Asked if the move will hurt the sentiments of some minorities and others who consume beef, Vij said, “We treat cow as holy. Whatever has been said in the country regarding cow over centuries, cannot match any other animal. Sentiments of so many people are connected, let people eat whatever they want, but keep cow out of that.”

He said that the government is keen to provide subsidy to the tune of 50 per cent on establishment of dairy unit of indigenous cows. The state will provide financial and technical support to cow welfare organisations like Gaushalas, Gau-Greh, Gau-Abhyaranya, Gau-Sadan, Gokul Gram that are engaged in maintenance and care of sick, injured, stray and uneconomic cows.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
December 6,2025

pilot.jpg

New Delhi: IndiGo, India’s largest airline, faced major operational turbulence this week after failing to prepare for new pilot-fatigue regulations issued by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA). The stricter rules—designed to improve flight safety—took effect in phases through 2024, with the latest implementation on November 1. IndiGo has acknowledged that inadequate roster planning led to widespread cancellations and delays.

Below are the key DGCA rules that affected IndiGo’s operations:

1. Longer Mandatory Weekly Rest

Weekly rest for pilots has been increased from 36 hours to 48 hours.

The government says the extended break is essential to curb cumulative fatigue. This rule remains in force despite the current crisis.

2. Cap on Night Landings

Pilots can now perform only two night landings per week—a steep reduction from the earlier limit of six.

Night hours, defined as midnight to early morning, are considered the least alert period for pilots.

Given the disruptions, this rule has been temporarily relaxed for IndiGo until February 10.

3. Reduced Maximum Night Flight Duty

Flight duty that stretches into the night is now capped at 10 hours.

This measure has also been kept on hold for IndiGo until February 10 to stabilize operations.

4. Weekly Rest Cannot Be Replaced With Personal Leave

Airlines can no longer count a pilot’s personal leave as part of the mandatory 48-hour rest.

Pilots say this closes a loophole that previously reduced actual rest time.

Currently, all airlines are exempt from this rule to normalise travel.

5. Mandatory Fatigue Monitoring

Airlines must submit quarterly fatigue reports along with corrective actions to DGCA.

This system aims to create a transparent fatigue-tracking framework across the industry.

The DGCA has stressed that these rules were crafted to strengthen flight safety and align India with global fatigue-management standards. The temporary relaxations are expected to remain until February 2025, giving IndiGo time to stabilise its schedules and restore normal air travel.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
December 13,2025

New Delhi: School-going children are picking up drug and smoking habits and engaging in consumption of alcohol, with the average age of introduction to such harmful substances found to be around 13 years, suggesting a need for earlier interventions as early as primary school, a multi-city survey by AIIMS-Delhi said.

The findings also showed substance use increased in higher grades, with grade XI/XII students two times more likely to report use of substances when compared with grade VIII students. This emphasised the importance of continued prevention and intervention through middle and high school.

The study led by Dr Anju Dhawan of AIIMS's National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, published in the National Medical Journal of India this month, looks at adolescent substance use across diverse regions.

The survey included 5,920 students from classes 8, 9, 11 and 12 in urban government, private and rural schools across 10 cities -- Bengaluru, Chandigarh, Delhi, Dibrugarh, Hyderabad, Imphal, Jammu, Lucknow, Mumbai, and Ranchi. The data were collected between May 2018 and June 2019.

The average age of initiation for any substance was 12.9 (2.8) years. It was lowest for inhalants (11.3 years) followed by heroin (12.3 years) and opioid pharmaceuticals (without prescription; 12.5 years).

Overall, 15.1 per cent of participants reported lifetime use, 10.3 per cent reported past year use, and 7.2 per cent reported use in the past month of any substance, the study found.

The most common substances used in the past year, after tobacco (4 per cent) and alcohol (3.8 per cent), were opioids (2.8 per cent), followed by cannabis (2 per cent) and inhalants (1.9 per cent). Use of non-prescribed pharmaceutical opioids was most common among opioid users (90.2 per cent).

On being asked, 'Do you think this substance is easily available for a person of your age' separately for each substance category, nearly half the students (46.3 per cent) endorsed that tobacco products and more than one-third of the students (36.5 per cent) agreed that a person of their age can easily procure alcohol products.

Similarly, for Bhang (21.9 per cent), ganja/charas (16.1 per cent), inhalants (15.2 per cent), sedatives (13.7 per cent), opium and heroin (10 per cent each), the students endorsed that these can be easily procured.

About 95 per cent of the children, irrespective of their grade, agreed with the statement that 'drug use is harmful'.

The rates of substance use (any) among boys were significantly higher than those of girls for substance use (ever), use in the past year and use in the past 30 days. Compared to grade VIII students, grade IX students were more likely, and grade XI/XII students were twice as likely to have used any substance (ever).

The likelihood of past-year use of any substance was also higher for grade IX students and for grade XI/XII students as compared to grade VIII students.

About 40 per cent of students mentioned that they had a family member who used tobacco or alcohol each. The use of cannabis (any product) and opioid (any product) by a family member was reported by 8.2 per cent and 3.9 per cent of students, respectively, while the use of other substances, such as inhalants/sedatives by family was 2-3 per cent, the study found.

A relatively smaller percentage of students reported use of tobacco or alcohol among peers as compared to among family members, while a higher percentage reported inhalants, sedatives, cannabis or opioid use among peers.

Children using substances (past year) compared to non-users reported significantly higher any substance use by their family members and peers.

There were 25.7 per cent students who replied 'yes' to the question 'conflicts/fights often occur in your family'. Most students also replied affirmatively to 'family members are aware of how their time is being spent' and 'damily members are aware of with whom they spend their time'.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.