Mangaluru, Sep 9: Three suspected cattle transporters managed to escape after a group of gau rakshaks' vowing allegiance to saffron groups waylaid their vehicle at Bhatnagara near Thokkottu under the limits of Ullal police station.
The incident occurred on Thursday night when two cattle were being transported in a vehicle allegedly to a local slaughter house.
Acting on a tip off, a group of so called Hindutva activists started following the vehicle from Kuthrar village. The vehicle was heading towards Thokkottu.
When the cattle transporters sensed the danger, they entered an inner road near Chembugudde. However, the motorbike-borne miscreants managed to waylay the vehicle at Bhatnagara.
Meanwhile, all the three persons on board the cattle transporting vehicle managed to escape leaving behind their vehicle and cattle. Within a few minutes a large number of people gathered there.
The police, who came to the spot after receiving information from local residents, seized the vehicle along with two cattle.
Comments
Naren Anna.Yencha ullar.
Clearly shows Naren's Frustration against World wide Growing Muslim Populations. Grow Up Brother. Dont waste your time.
naren kotian
IS TIPU SULTHAN A KRISHNA, TO RAPE OVER 3000. WHERE IS THE STAMINA.
DONT WRITE NONSENSE FOR THE SAKE OF WRITING.
tippu sultan was never a patriot , he ransacked 100's of temples and raped over 3000 hindu and christian women .his massacre of non msulism particularly roman catholics and kodavas recorded every where ...he is a street side jihadist .....rightly said Mr pinto ... we endorse your thinking ...
regarding cattle trafikkers , merciless attacks on trafikkers required ... they must be ensured 72 virgins hahaha ...... their religion teaches stealing and all kind of third rated work ..
Stop exporting, we will stop eating beef, but here the story is different. they want foreigners to eat beef which they worship.
in halal method, animals feel zero pain, proved by science. it is also proved that halal food is more tastier than non halal. and there is no blood in the meat in halal method, even science says halal is the best method. even non-muslims in western countries wants halal chicken, just check the restaurant in usa name is halal guys restaurant. people stand in queue, most of them are non-muslims. next to the restaurant there is one more restaurant, which is non-halal. which is fully empty
Do animals have rights?
The vegetarian argument is that killing animals for the benefit of humans is cruel and an infringement of their rights. They put both on the same level without conceding any superiority to humans over animals. This argument is seriously flawed, because if animals had rights comparable to those of humans, they must also have equivalent duties. In other words, we must be able to blame them and punish them if they violate the rights of others. It is absurd that it should be considered a crime for humans to kill a sheep, but natural for a lion to do so. The problem stems from a misconception of the role of human life within the animal kingdom: a denial of purposeful creation within a clearly defined hierarchy degrades humans to the level of any other creature. Yet even then, the argument is illogical: Why should plants, for example, be denied the same protection from a violation of the sanctity of their life?
Is Islamic slaughter cruel?
The question of how an animal should be slaughtered to avoid cruelty is a different one. It is true that when the blood flows from the throat of an animal it looks violent, but just because meat is now bought neatly and hygienically packaged on supermarket shelves does not mean the animal didn’t have to die? Non-Islamic slaughter methods dictate that the animal should be rendered unconscious before slaughter. This is usually achieved by stunning or electrocution. Is it less painful to shoot a bolt into a sheep’s brain or to ring a chicken’s neck than to slit its throat? To watch the procedure does not objectively tell us what the animal feels.
The scientific facts
A team at the university of Hannover in Germany examined these claims through the use of EEG and ECG records during slaughter. Several electrodes were surgically implanted at various points of the skull of all the animals used in the experiment and they were then allowed to recover for several weeks. Some of the animals were subsequently slaughtered the halal way by making a swift, deep incision with a sharp knife on the neck, cutting the jugular veins and carotid arteries of both sides together with the trachea and esophagus but leaving the spinal cord intact. The remainder were stunned before slaughter using a captive bolt pistol method as is customary in Western slaughterhouses. The EEG and ECG recordings allowed to monitor the condition of the brain and heart throughout.
The Halal method
With the halal method of slaughter, there was not change in the EEG graph for the first three seconds after the incision was made, indicating that the animal did not feel any pain from the cut itself. This is not surprising. Often, if we cut ourselves with a sharp implement, we do not notice until some time later. The following three seconds were characterized by a condition of deep sleep-like unconsciousness brought about by the draining of large quantities of blood from the body. Thereafter the EEG recorded a zero reading, indicating no pain at all, yet at that time the heart was still beating and the body convulsing vigorously as a reflex reaction of the spinal cord. It is this phase which is most unpleasant to onlookers who are falsely convinced that the animal suffers whilst its brain does actually no longer record any sensual messages.
The Western method
Using the Western method, the animals were apparently unconscious after stunning, and this method of dispatch would appear to be much more peaceful for the onlooker. However, the EEG readings indicated severe pain immediately after stunning. Whereas in the first example, the animal ceases to feel pain due to the brain starvation of blood and oxygen – a brain death, to put it in laymen’s terms – the second example first causes a stoppage of the heart whilst the animal still feels pain. However, there are no unsightly convulsions, which not only means that there is more blood retention in the meat, but also that this method lends itself much more conveniently to the efficiency demands of modern mass slaughter procedures. It is so much easier to dispatch an animal on the conveyor belt, if it does not move.
@ ronald pinto.. Gau bakshakane e prakaranavannu thiruchalu komugalabege hunnaravannu hudukutta RSS bareda Ithihasavannu odi yake ninna kolaku buddiyannu thorisuttiruveya...? Jiyo aur jeenedo
Ronald Pinto you are 100% correct... Blind followers..
?????????????? ??????????? ???????? ???? ?????? ??????????? ????? ??????? ??????? ?????? ????????? ??????.
?????????????? ??? ????????? (1799 ????? )
????? ??????????? ??? ??????? (1857?????)
????? ???????????? ??????? ????????? ??????????? ???? ????, ??????? ???? ????????, ???????? ??????, ?????? ??????????? ????? ?????? ???????, ??????? ????????????, ???? ?????, ??o??? ????, ????? ???? ??????? ????, ???? ?????????, ??????? ?????????, ??????? ??????, ???? ???????, ??????? ????????? ????, ??????? ?????? ( ??????, ????????, ??????? ) ???????? ?????? ( ????, ??????, ?????? ) ????????? ?????, ????????, ??? ????????. ????????? ????, ??????????? ????. ???? ???? ??????????? ?????.
??????????? ????? 1,857-1,799
=58 ?????????????? ????? ????????? 58 ???? ?????? ??????????? ????? ????????????. ?????? ? ???? ?????? ????? ??????? ???? ??????????? ?????????????? ???????????? ?????? ??????
Add new comment