Sheshadri bats for director's creative liberty at Bettada Jeeva screening

[email protected] (CD Network)
July 15, 2011

Mangalore, July 15: The perennial dilemma faced by a film director while transforming a classical work into visual form dominated the discussions that followed the screening of P. Sheshadri's award-winning movie “Bettada Jeeva” at Roshni Nilaya here on Friday.

Reacting to an observation made by journalist Praveen Padigar that the movie did not have the same climax as in the Shivarama Karanth's celebrated novel and that the movie did not end as a 'madhura smrithi' (pleasant memories), director Sheshadri said that he deliberately wanted to leave the audience with some disturbing questions.

“I have taken the creative liberty while adapting Bettada Jeeva into the film form. I wanted to portray how modernization has brought in a change in the values by showing the fugitive returning to a completely commercialized place in his pursuit of the dream village, he was enamored with for its hospitality and innocence,” Mr Sheshadri said.

Defending his decision of not adhering strictly to the original novel, Mr Sheshadri said, any classical work possessed the innate strength of leaving the reader with an experience that is his own. “The Western Ghats seen by Karanth could have been different from what we are seeing today. The values have also changed. I am afraid even Karanth would have thought differently about the experiences if he were to react to a similar situation today,” Mr Sheshadri said.

“A novel is always a novel and its cinematic adaptation will always be influenced by the director's perception of the novel. Then there is always the creative freedom, which is very important for any director. If a director does not have anything to say the he would not venture into making the movie based on a classic,” he said.

He also agreed that the authors generally agreed with the director's perception of the movie. This was true in the case of Chomana Dudi, which was brought to celluloid by B.V. Karanth, he added.

Sheshadri then explained the making of the movie Bettada Jeeva and said he did not expect that movie would be such a success.

“The novel “Bettada Jeeva” haunted me for more than three decades. When I read it for the first time in my high school days, it did not make much of an impact on me. However, it kept coming back to me during various phases in my life, and I finally mustered the courage,” he said.

“On the hindsight I think I should have waited bit more on this venture, I could have become more mature,” he added.

Mr Sheshadri is the first-ever director to win the national award for six consecutive films including the best environmental film award for Bettada Jeeva.

“Munnudi” based on Boluvaru Mohammed Kunhi's story “Muttuchera” won him his first national award in 2001. That was the beginning and then followed “Athithi” (2002), “Beru” (2004), “Tutturi” (2007) and “Vimukti” (2009), all national award winning films.

“I was a bit apprehensive as several directors who had made an attempt to work on this novel had abandoned it since all it had were only a series of incidents,” sayid Sheshadri.

“It is easy to elongate a short story, but it is difficult to trim a novel. However, slowly incidents started converting into images,” he recalled.

Sheshadri found it difficult to find a suitable location. Finally he zeroed in on a place 40 km from Subramanya. It is a place Karanth visits in the novel. Along with writer Gopalakrishna Pai and Katte Govindaiah's son, Karanth's good old friend, they visited places Karanth had gone seven decades ago.

“We found Kelabylu of Karanth in Kujagodu village in the interiors of Western Ghats. Things started falling in place once shooting started and professional artistes including Dattanna, Rameshwari Varma, Suchendra Prasad filled life into the characters,” he said.

Speaking on his role in the movie, Dattanna said, playing Gopalaiah's character gave him immense satisfaction as his was a role replete with zest for life and heart for challenge. “Gopalaiah lived as an integral part of the forest and stood out for his leadership abilities without being too dominating,” he said, but admitted playing his role was not a challenging job for him as everything was laid out at the screen play stage itself.

“But bringing out the innate personal traits of the characters was a big challenge. The director has handled it very smartly,” he added.

Shobhana Manohar, HoD of English, Roshni Nilaya, BH Maheshcandra, bureau chief, Prajavani, Mangalore, Natesh Ullal, theatre person, Govind Belgaumkar, bureau chief, The Hindu, Mangalore, participated in the discussion.

The programme was organized by the Pathrakarthara Adhayayana Kendra Mangalore.


bj_0

bj_1

bj_2

bj_3

bj_4

bj_5

bj_6

bj_7

bj_8

bj_9

bj_10

bj_11

bj_12

bj_13

bj_14

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com news network
January 19,2026

rizwanzameer.jpg

Bengaluru: As the dust settles on the recent legislative session, the corridors of Vidhana Soudha are buzzing with more than just policy talk. A high-stakes game of political musical chairs has begun, exposing a deepening rift within the Congress party’s Muslim leadership as a major Cabinet reshuffle looms.

With the party hierarchy signaling a "50% refresh" to gear up for the 2028 Assembly elections, the race to fill three projected Muslim ministerial berths has transformed from a strategic discussion into an all-out turf war.

The "Star Son" Spark

The internal friction turned public this week following provocative remarks by Zaid Khan, actor and son of Wakf Minister Zameer Ahmed Khan. Zaid’s claim—that his father "helped" secure a ticket for Shivajinagar MLA Rizwan Arshad in 2023—has acted as a lightning rod for resentment.

Rizwan’s camp was quick to fire back, dismissing the comment as a desperate attempt by Zameer to manufacture seniority. "Rizwan’s political pedigree was forged in the NSUI and Youth Congress long before Zameer even stepped into the party," a supporter noted, highlighting Rizwan’s tenure as an AICC secretary and his two-term presidency of the State Youth Congress.

A Tale of Two Loyalists

While both Zameer Ahmed Khan and Rizwan Arshad are staunch allies of Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and represent Bengaluru strongholds, their political DNA could not be more different:

•    Zameer Ahmed Khan: A four-time MLA who crossed over from JD(S) in 2018. Known for his "overzealous" and often polarizing outreach during communal flashpoints—from the DJ Halli riots to the recent Wakf land notice controversy—his style has frequently left the Congress high command in a state of "discomfort."

•    Rizwan Arshad: A homegrown organizational man. Seen as a "quiet performer," Arshad represents the sophisticated, moderate face of the party, preferred by those who find Zameer’s brand of politics too volatile.

The Outsiders Looking In

The bickering isn't limited to a duo. The "Beary" community, represented by leaders like N A Haris and Saleem Ahmed, is demanding its pound of flesh. Saleem Ahmed, the Chief Whip in the Legislative Council, has dropped the veil of diplomacy, openly declaring his ministerial aspirations.

"I was the only working president not included in the Cabinet last time," Saleem noted pointedly, signaling that the "loyalty quota" is no longer enough to keep the peace.

As Chief Minister Siddaramaiah prepares to finalize the list, he faces a delicate balancing act: rewarding the aggressive grassroots mobilization of Zameer’s camp without alienating the organizational stalwarts and minority sub-sects who feel increasingly sidelined by the "Chamarajpet-Shivajinagar" binary.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 1,2026

Bengaluru: Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar on Sunday criticised the Union Budget presented by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, claiming it offered no tangible benefit to the state.

Though he said he was yet to study the budget in detail, Shivakumar asserted that Karnataka had gained little from it. “There is no benefit for our state from the central budget. I was observing it. They have now named a programme after Mahatma Gandhi, after repealing the MGNREGA Act that was named after him,” he said.

Speaking to reporters here, the Deputy Chief Minister demanded the restoration of MGNREGA, and made it clear that the newly enacted rural employment scheme — VB-G RAM G — which proposes a 60:40 fund-sharing formula between the Centre and the states, would not be implemented in Karnataka.

“I don’t see any major share for our state in this budget,” he added.

Shivakumar, who also holds charge of Bengaluru development, said there were high expectations for the city from the Union Budget. “The Prime Minister calls Bengaluru a ‘global city’, but what has the Centre done for it?” he asked.

He also drew attention to the problems faced by sugar factories, particularly those in the cooperative sector, alleging a lack of timely decisions and support from the central government.

Noting that the Centre has the authority to fix the minimum support price (MSP) for agricultural produce, Shivakumar said the Union government must take concrete steps to protect farmers’ interests.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 23,2026

Karnataka Governor Thaawarchand Gehlot read only three lines from the 122-paragraph address prepared by the Congress-led state government while addressing the joint session of the Legislature on Thursday, effectively bypassing large sections critical of the BJP-led Union government.

The omitted portions of the customary Governor’s address outlined what the state government described as a “suppressive situation in economic and policy matters” under India’s federal framework. The speech also sharply criticised the Centre’s move to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) with the Viksit Bharat–Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Act, commonly referred to as the VB-GRAM (G) Act.

Governor Gehlot had earlier conveyed his objection to several paragraphs that were explicitly critical of the Union government. On Thursday, he confined himself to the opening lines — “I extend a warm welcome to all of you to the joint session of the State legislature. I am extremely pleased to address this august House” — before jumping directly to the concluding sentence of the final paragraph.

He ended the address by reading the last line of paragraph 122: “Overall, my government is firmly committed to doubling the pace of the State’s economic, social and physical development. Jai Hind — Jai Karnataka.”

According to the prepared speech, the Karnataka government demanded the scrapping of the VB-GRAM (G) Act, describing it as “contractor-centric” and detrimental to rural livelihoods, and called for the full restoration of MGNREGA. The state government argued that the new law undermines decentralisation, weakens labour protections, and centralises decision-making in violation of constitutional norms.

Key points from the unread sections of the speech:

•    Karnataka facing a “suppressive” economic and policy environment within the federal system

•    Repeal of MGNREGA described as a blow to rural livelihoods

•    VB-GRAM (G) Act accused of protecting corporate and contractor interests

•    New law alleged to weaken decentralised governance

•    Decision-making said to be imposed by the Centre without consulting states

•    Rights of Adivasis, women, backward classes and agrarian communities curtailed

•    Labourers allegedly placed under contractor control

•    States facing mounting fiscal stress due to central policies

•    VB-GRAM (G) Act accused of enabling large-scale corruption

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.