Bus operators seek fare revision, public oppose; Decision awaited

[email protected] (DHNS, Photos by Savitha B R)
July 16, 2011
Mangalore, July 16: The bus operators have appealed the Regional Transport Authority (RTA) to increase the bus fare in the district in the backdrop of hike in the prices of diesel and spare parts, while the public and activists of various organisations opposed it and urged the Authority not to increase the burden on the people.

At a public hearing convened by the RTA at the Deputy Commissioner's Office here on Saturday, the bus operators said they want a hike of 50 paise for first four stages and Re one for the next four stages for city buses, 70 paise hike for shuttle buses and 75 paise for Express buses.

RTO Mallikarjuna said the hike sought by the bus operators for city buses include—Rs 4.50 (Rs 5), Rs 5 (Rs 5.50), Rs 7 (Rs 8), Rs 8 (Rs 8.50), Rs 8 (Rs 9), Rs 9 (Rs 10). For rural service the revision sought by the owners include—Rs 4.50 (Rs 5), Rs 5 (Rs 6), Rs 6 (Rs 6.50), Rs 6 (Rs 7), Rs 7 (Rs 8). The revision sought for moffusil service include—Rs 5 (Rs 5.50), Rs 9 (Rs 10), Rs 13 (Rs 14), Rs 17 (Rs 18), Rs 22 (Rs 23) and the revision sought for Express buses include—Rs 5 (Rs 5), Rs 9 (Rs 10), Rs 13 (Rs 14) and so on.

Public voice

Bus Karmika Sangha representative Mohammed Rafiq said increasing the bus fare within four months is not acceptable. No RTA meeting took any decision which was in favour of the public. The RTA takes decision in the interest of the bus operators. The revised fare of the KSRTC is less than the city bus fare. It is not right to seek revision in bus fare for every once in three months. The DC should recommend for the nationalisation of routes to help the passengers.

On the other hand, Nagarika Hitharakshana Samithi President Hanumanth Kamath said “the bus operators speak of stage only for the revision of bus fare. When a passenger boards a bus, then he is not asked to pay according to the stage. While revising the bus fare, the RTA has a responsibility to see that the buses are not overcrowded, buses follow the rules and regulations.”

“Many a time, the buses cancel their trips causing inconvenience to the public and the bus drivers and conductors behave rudely with the passengers. Though the KSRTC had sought 72 bus permits, the RTA did not issue it upholding the DM notification. However, the same RTA could issue 23 permits to private bus operators,” he charged adding that the RTA should support the government-owned KSRTC, instead of helping the private bus owners.

He said the bus fare should not be increased even by a single pie. CITU District General Secretary Sunil Kumar Bajal said the hike in the bus fare will cause lot of inconvenience to the poor labourers who live with Rs 2,000 per month. “If the district administration takes a decision in favour of the bus owners, then we will intensify our protest,” he said.

Hasanabba, a member of the public, said the officials should not fine the buses within the city limits. “The fine should be imposed when the bus reaches the bus stand, to avoid traffic block. Zeebra crossing should be marked on all the important places in the city,” he suggested.

Owners speak

Canara Bus Operators Association President Rajavarma Ballal said that they are not asking for more. “With the steep increase in the prices of diesel and spare parts of the buses, we want the revision in the bus fare. The bus fare for Express buses should be hiked by 8.5 per cent and shuttle buses by 7.5 per cent. The cost of running a bus per kilometre has increased to Rs 28.8. We are asking for increase in five paise per passenger kilometre,” he said.

Dakshina Kannada Bus Operators Association President Bhaskar Salian said “About 75 per cent of the earnings from the bus operation goes to the fuel. When KSRTC could not withstand the hike in the price of petroleum products, how can we withstand? We are already incurring loss due to hike in the prices of petroleum products and spare parts.

We can not run the buses if the situation continues,” he said. Dakshina Kannada Bus Operators Association General Secretary Ajeej Parthipady said the insurance premium has been hiked by 80 per cent in the last one year. “We have not hiked student concession fare since 2008. We do not have any tax exemption just like the way KSRTC enjoys in North Karnataka,” he said.

Superintendent of Police Labhu Ram was also present.

'Decision on fare hike soon'

Deputy Commissioner Dr N S Chennappa Gowda said that he along with RTO?and SP have heard the bus operators and the public appeal. “After studying the bus fare in the neighbouring district and other factors, a final decision will be taken. We have certain guidelines from the government and we can not hike beyond the guidelines,” he said.

A meeting to discuss on the problems faced by the passengers and the public will be convened soon, he added.

dc1

dc2

dc3

dc4

dc5

dc7

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 1,2026

Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash an investigation against a WhatsApp group administrator accused of allowing the circulation of obscene and offensive images depicting Hindutva politicians and idols in 2021.

Justice M Nagaprasanna observed that, prima facie, the ingredients of the offence under Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code were made out. “The offence under Section 295A of the IPC is met to every word of its ingredient, albeit prima facie,” the judge said.

The petitioner, Sirajuddin, a resident of Belthangady taluk in Dakshina Kannada district, had challenged the FIR registered against him at the CEN (Cyber, Economics and Narcotics) police station, Mangaluru, for offences under Section 295A of the IPC and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act. Section 295A relates to punishment for deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage the religious feelings of any class of citizens.

According to the complaint filed by K Jayaraj Salian, also a resident of Belthangady taluk, he received a WhatsApp group link from an unknown source and was added to the group after accessing it. The group reportedly had six administrators and around 250 participants, where obscene and offensive images depicting Hindu deities and certain political figures were allegedly circulated repeatedly.

Sirajuddin was arrested in connection with the case and later released on bail on February 16, 2021. He argued before the court that he was being selectively targeted, while other administrators—including the creator of the group—were neither arrested nor investigated. He also contended that the Magistrate could not have taken cognisance of the offence under Section 295A without prior sanction under Section 196(1) of the CrPC.

Rejecting the argument, Justice Nagaprasanna held that prior sanction is required only at the stage of taking cognisance, and not at the stage of registration of the crime or during investigation.

The judge noted that the State had produced the entire investigation material before the court. “A perusal of the material reveals depictions of Hindu deities in an extraordinarily obscene, demeaning and profane manner. The content is such that its reproduction in a judicial order would itself be inappropriate,” the court said, adding that the material, on its face, had the tendency to outrage religious feelings and disturb communal harmony.

Observing that the case was still at the investigation stage, the court said it could not interdict the probe at this juncture. However, it expressed concern that the investigating officer appeared to have not proceeded uniformly against all administrators. The court clarified that if the investigation revealed the active involvement of any member in permitting the circulation of such content, they must also be proceeded against.

“At this investigative stage, any further observation by this Court would be unnecessary,” the order concluded.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 1,2026

Bengaluru: Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar on Sunday criticised the Union Budget presented by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, claiming it offered no tangible benefit to the state.

Though he said he was yet to study the budget in detail, Shivakumar asserted that Karnataka had gained little from it. “There is no benefit for our state from the central budget. I was observing it. They have now named a programme after Mahatma Gandhi, after repealing the MGNREGA Act that was named after him,” he said.

Speaking to reporters here, the Deputy Chief Minister demanded the restoration of MGNREGA, and made it clear that the newly enacted rural employment scheme — VB-G RAM G — which proposes a 60:40 fund-sharing formula between the Centre and the states, would not be implemented in Karnataka.

“I don’t see any major share for our state in this budget,” he added.

Shivakumar, who also holds charge of Bengaluru development, said there were high expectations for the city from the Union Budget. “The Prime Minister calls Bengaluru a ‘global city’, but what has the Centre done for it?” he asked.

He also drew attention to the problems faced by sugar factories, particularly those in the cooperative sector, alleging a lack of timely decisions and support from the central government.

Noting that the Centre has the authority to fix the minimum support price (MSP) for agricultural produce, Shivakumar said the Union government must take concrete steps to protect farmers’ interests.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 23,2026

Mangaluru: The Karnataka Government Polytechnic (KPT), Mangaluru, has achieved autonomous status from the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), becoming the first government polytechnic in the country to receive such recognition in its 78-year history. The status was granted by AICTE, New Delhi, and subsequently approved by the Karnataka Board of Technical Education in October last year.

Officials said the autonomy was conferred a few months ago. Until recently, AICTE extended autonomous status only to engineering colleges, excluding diploma institutions. However, with a renewed national focus on skill development, several government polytechnics across India have now been granted autonomy.

KPT, the second-largest polytechnic in Karnataka, was established in 1946 with four branches and has since expanded to offer eight diploma programmes, including computer science and polymer technology. The institution is spread across a 19-acre campus.

Ravindra M Keni, the first dean of the institution, told The Times of India that AICTE had proposed autonomous status for polytechnic institutions that are over 25 years old. “Many colleges applied. In the first round, 100 institutions were shortlisted, which was further narrowed down to 15 in the second round. We have already completed one semester after becoming an autonomous institution,” he said. He added that nearly 500 students are admitted annually across eight three-year diploma courses.

Explaining the factors that helped KPT secure autonomy, Keni said the institution has consistently recorded 100 per cent admissions and placements for its graduates. He also noted its strong performance in sports, with the college emerging champions for 12 consecutive years, along with active student participation in NCC and NSS activities.

Autonomous status allows KPT to design industry-oriented curricula, conduct examinations, prepare question papers, and manage academic documentation independently. The institution can also directly collaborate with industries and receive priority funding from AICTE or the Ministry of Education. While academic autonomy has been granted, financial control will continue to rest with the state government.

“There will be separate committees for examinations, question paper setting, boards of studies, and boards of examiners. The institution will now have the freedom to conduct admissions without government notifications and issue its own marks cards,” Keni said, adding that new academic initiatives would be planned after a year of functioning under the autonomous framework.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.