Gogoi: yes, there were lapses on our part, but what about scribe’s responsibility?

July 17, 2012

assammol

Guwahati, July 17: Even as the July 9 molestation of a girl in the city by a gang rocked the Assam Assembly on Monday, outside the House, Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi said the Government had asked the CID to probe the allegation that a television journalist instigated the incident.

Speaking to journalists, the Chief Minister admitted his lapses and said the police was at fault. The journalist too had a responsibility but he did not inform the police. “It was alright he was taking video [of the incident]. But why didn’t he inform the police? Journalist also did not do his job. Were not others present too responsible? Police is also at fault. It has reflected on me as I am the Home Minister. Yes, there have been lapses of my department too. That is why I have ordered a probe.”

Mr Gogoi said it was unethical on the part of journalists to ask what the name of the victim is and to reveal her identity.

In another development, the victim met the Chief Minister at his official residence and narrated the incident. He assured her that not a single guilty person would be allowed to go scot-free.

An official release said she sought assistance and when she expressed her desire to open a parlour, Mr Gogoi assured her that he would provide Rs. 50,000 from the Chief Minister's relief fund, and also look into her housing problem.

Meanwhile, the city Senior Superintendent of Police, Apurba Jibon Barua, was transferred to Dibrugarh district. The police have so far arrested eight molesters, one of them earlier in the day.

Uproar in Assembly

In the Assembly, the opposition parties — the All India United Democratic Front (AIUDF), the Asom Gana Parishad (AGP) and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) — sought adjournment of the House to discuss the issue of growing insecurity of women and deterioration of the law and order situation.

They also cited the attacks on Congress legislator Rumi Nath and on members of the Public Accounts Committee of the House by miscreants.

While the treasury benches agreed to a one-hour discussion immediately after question hour, they opposed adjournment motions moved by the AGP and the BJP during zero hour, on the ground that the molestation incident was sub judice and an enquiry had been ordered under the Commission of Inquiry Act.

The Speaker ordered the suspension of all 18 AIUDF members when they disrupted question hour. However, as they persisted with their demand, amidst chaos, the marshal and deputy marshals and watch and ward staff entered the House to evict them.

A little later, after a brief adjournment, the Speaker withdrew the suspension order at the request of the treasury benches. However, the AIUDF members continued with their demand and question hour began amidst uproar. The AIUDF legislators moved to the well, and later staged a walkout. The AGP and BJP members also walked out after their adjournment motions were rejected.

The Speaker, in his ruling, strongly condemned the molestation of the girl and appealed to the Government to mete out the strictest punishment in accordance with law and to prevent recurrence of such incidents.

In reply to a question, Environment and Forest Minister Rockybul Hussain said 16 persons had been arrested on charges of attacking Ms Rumi Nath and her second husband Abu Sahid Zakir Hussain on June 29, while three personal security officers of the legislator were suspended for dereliction of duty. The Cachar Superintendent of Police had initiated departmental proceedings against the three PSOs.


Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 29,2024

indore.jpg

In yet another setback to the Congress party amid the ongoing Lok Sabha elections, its candidate from Indore Akshay Kanti Bam withdrew his nomination on Monday, April 29, days before voting.

Interestingly, he had reached the Collector's office with BJP MLA Ramesh Mendola to withdraw his nomination. He also reportedly joined BJP. 

Senior BJP leader and state cabinet minister Kailash Vijayvargiya in a post on X said Bam was welcome to join the BJP.

"Congress Lok Sabha candidate from Indore Akshay Kanti Bam is welcome in the BJP under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, party national president J P Nadda, Chief Minister Mohan Yadav and state president VD Sharma," he said in the post.

The Congress had fielded Bam against sitting BJP MP Shankar Lalwani from the Indore Lok Sabha seat, where polling will be held on May 13.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 23,2024

cong.jpg

Congress workers protested outside the home of Nilesh Kumbhani, the party's candidate from Gujarat's Surat Lok Sabha seat whose nomination form was rejected due to alleged discrepancies, as he was likely to join the BJP, sources said on Tuesday.

The protest came a day after the BJP's Mukesh Dalal was declared the winner from the party stronghold following the withdrawal of all the other eight candidates in the fray.

The sources said that the protesters called Kumbhani a "traitor" and "killer of democracy", adding that he could join the BJP as early as this week.

Kumbhani's nomination form was rejected after he was unable to present even one of his three proposers before Returning Officer Sourabh Pardhi.

The BJP had raised questions about the discrepancies in the signatures of three proposers in his nomination form.

The nomination form of Suresh Padsala, the Congress' substitute candidate from Surat, was also invalidated, pushing the party out of the poll fray in the BJP stronghold.

In his order, Pardhi said the four nomination forms submitted by Kumbhani and Padsala were rejected because at first sight, discrepancies were found in the signatures of the proposers, and they did not appear genuine.

The Lok Sabha elections in the Surat seat was supposed to take place on May 7.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 20,2024

Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, on Friday, said that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) plans to reintroduce electoral bonds in some capacity following extensive consultations with all stakeholders, should it come back to power in the 2024 general elections, according to a report in the Hindustan Times (HT).

HT cited Nirmala Sitharam as saying, “We still have to do a lot of consultation with stakeholders and see what is it that we have to do to make or bring in a framework which will be acceptable to all, primarily retain the level of transparency and completely remove the possibility of black money entering into this.”

However, the Centre has not yet decided whether to seek a review of the ruling made by the Supreme Court (SC), she said.

She further added, “What the scheme, which has been just thrown out by the Supreme Court, brought in was transparency. What prevailed earlier was just free-for-all.”

Launched in 2018, electoral bonds were accessible for acquisition at any State Bank of India (SBI) branch. Contributions made through this programme by corporations and even foreign entities via Indian subsidiaries received full tax exemption, while the identities of the donors remained confidential, safeguarded by both the bank and the recipient political parties.

On February 15, a five-judge Constitution Bench struck down the scheme, deeming it ‘unconstitutional’ due to its complete anonymisation of contributions to political parties. Additionally, the Bench stated that the articulated objectives of curbing black money or illegal election financing did not warrant disproportionately infringing upon voters’ right to information.

FM Sitharaman said, some aspects of the scheme need improvement and they will be brought back following consultations.

She also lashed out at the Opposition’s claims that the BJP disregarded criminal charges against leaders who switched from other parties to join the ruling party.

The HT quoted her as saying, “The BJP can’t sit here and say, you come to my party today, and the case will be closed tomorrow. The case has to go through the courts that have to take a call; they will not just say, “Oh, he’s come to your party, close the case.” Doesn’t happen that way. So is this washing machine a term they want to use for the courts?”

She further said that the Union government plans to simplify the process of taxation and make it easy for investments to come through into the country.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.