Implementation of LPG cylinder cap fuels chaos, confusion over KYC

December 7, 2012

Cylindr

New Delhi, December 7: Shoddy implementation of the government's new quota system for subsidized cooking gas has resulted in chaos. There's utter confusion about how many subsidized cylinders a consumer is entitled to in the remaining six months of 2012-13 since the new scheme was announced on September 13, 2012.

That day's government release was unambiguous. It said: "The number of subsidized LPG cylinders available to each consumer in the remaining part of the current financial year will be three."

But some dealers believe that consumers have already run out of their quota, while some others insist that unless consumers fill up the KYC form, cylinders can't be given to them.

Similarly, there's confusion over what it takes to fill up the KYC ( know-your-customer) form. Ask Ananya Gupta of Mumbai's Matunga. She was suddenly asked to produce her marriage certificate, PAN card, bank account details and the original registration book by her dealer for her KYC form or face discontinuation of gas supply.

Original registration book? Is that the blue book that most consumers have misplaced? Questions such as these are redundant because the KYC form makes no such demand. It requires two things: ID proof and address proof. And for this driving licence, passport, ration card, phone or electricity bill, Adhaar card and several other ordinary things will suffice.

But dealers don't know or pretend not to know. P N Seth, vice-president of All-India LPG Dealers' Association, for instance, doesn't know about the three-cylinder quota in the six remaining months of the year since September. He said, "Most consumers have completed their quota and are now buying non-subsidized gas."

All-India Indane Distributors' Association president A Ramachandran said consumers were "not cooperating".

He said, "If they don't submit the KYC form by year end (the new deadline), the connections would be blocked."

An Indane dealer in Anna Salai helpfully added: "Once a connection is blocked, it can only be unlocked after government permission."

In this confusion over gas supplies, a black market in cylinders is flourishing. Some consumers said they were buying cylinders well above the non-subsidized price range of Rs 885-950 band (depending on VAT) per cylinder.

A consumer in Delhi's Alaknanda area, Mitashi Saxena, was unsure about whether she was required to fill a KYC form or not, and wondered whether she would get subsidized cylinders next year.

"We're a family of eight and have two kitchens. But we still don't know whether we need to fill the form. And our distributor doesn't seem to know either,'' she said. Another resident complains of delayed service.

For people in hill states like J&K, Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand, where families need more fuel to keep warm, it's going to be a winter of discontent. "We've not been contacted by our dealer and run out of out quota. We're planning to spend some time with relatives in the plains," said Shivani Joshi of Nainital.

In Chandigarh, too, large families that don't have separate kitchens on different floors, have been jolted by the new condition. Federation of Chandigarh sector welfare association chairman P C Sanghi said the decision is against Indian tradition of large joint families. Consumer rights activist Arvind Thakur said, "A bigger issue is that building byelaws are so stringent in Chandigarh that people can't even think of building a separate kitchen."

Lucknow housewife Rita Singh spent several tense days when the cylinder did not fetch up even eight days after booking — as against the normal period of 48 hours.

"When I asked, they said most of their staff was engaged in KYC verification," she said.


Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 13,2024

indiairan.jpg

New Delhi: Seventeen Indians are on board an Israeli-linked container ship that has been seized by the Iranian military amid heightened tensions between Iran and Israel.

Official sources said India is in touch with Iranian authorities through diplomatic channels, both in Tehran and in Delhi, to ensure the welfare and early release of the Indian nationals.

The Iranian action came amid increasing fears that Tehran may launch an attack on Israeli soil in retaliation to a strike on the Iranian consulate in Syria 12 days ago.

"We are aware that a cargo ship 'MSC Aries' has been taken control by Iran. We have learnt that there are 17 Indian nationals onboard," said a source.

"We are in touch with the Iranian authorities through diplomatic channels, both in Tehran and in Delhi, to ensure security, welfare and early release of Indian nationals," it said.

Reports said Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards seized MSC Aries on Saturday morning when it was sailing through the Strait of Hormuz.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 12,2024

iranisrael.jpg

New Delhi, Apr 12: India on Friday asked its citizens not to travel to Iran or Israel amid escalating tensions between the two countries following a strike on the Iranian consulate in Syria 11 days ago.

Iran blamed Israel for the strike and there have been fears that Tehran may launch an attack on Israel soon.

In an advisory, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) also urged the Indians residing in Iran and Israel to exercise utmost precautions about their safety and restrict their movements to minimum.

“In view of the prevailing situation in the region, all Indians are advised not to travel to Iran or Israel till further notice,” it said.

“All those who are currently residing in Iran or Israel are requested to get in touch with Indian Embassies there and register themselves,” the MEA said.

“They are also requested to observe utmost precautions about their safety and restrict their movements to the minimum,” it added. 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 9,2024

arvind.jpg

The Delhi High Court rejected Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's plea challenging his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and remand order passed by the trial court in connection with the excise policy case. The court delivered the verdict in the excise policy case on Tuesday.

In its order, the high court said the petition challenged the arrest and said it was in violation of Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). "The court clarifies that the plea is not for bail but for declaring the arrest illegal," Bar and Bench reported while citing the court order.

The high court said the material collected by the ED “reveals Arvind Kejriwal conspired and was actively involved in use and concealment of proceeds of crime." 

“The ED case also reveals that he was involved in his personal capacity as well as convenor of AAP," the order said.

Kejriwal had earlier questioned the timing of the arrest that came just ahead of the Lok Sabha Elections 2024.  Reacting to this, the court said, “Petitioner has been arrested in money laundering case and court has to examine his arrest and remand as per law irrespective of timing of elections."

Reacting to Kejriwal's argument casting doubt on the statements of “approvers" in the excise policy case, the court said the statements of “Raghav Magunta and Sarath Reddy are approver statements which were recorded under the PMLA as well as Section 164 CrPC".

“To cast doubt on the manner of recording statement of approver would amount to casting aspersions on the court and judge," the order added. “The law of approver is over 100 years old and not one year old. It cannot be suggested that it was enacted to implicate the present petitioner (Kejriwal)," it added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.