Pakistan interior minister Rehman Malik compares 26/11 carnage with Babri

December 15, 2012

New_Delhi

New Delhi, December 15: Pakistani interior minister Rehman Malik dealt a blow to the efforts to normalize bilateral ties by raking up the Babri issue and seeking to draw a parallel between destruction of the mosque and terror attacks including the 26/11 carnage in Mumbai.

"We don't want any 9/11, we don't want any Mumbai bomb blast (attacks), we don't want any Samjhauta Express blast and we don't want Babri masjid issue," Malik said, stunning his hosts into silence and souring the positive vibes over the new visa regime designed to facilitate travel between the two countries.

Although he concluded by saying that he wanted to work for peace between the two countries and in the entire region, his reference to Babri was seen as a provocation. This was the first instance that a visiting Pakistani dignitary had waded into the sensitive Babri issue.

Malik was speaking impromptu after he, along with home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde, had launched the liberalized visa regime as part of the painstaking effort to repair the relationship mauled by the ISI-backed Lashkar gang who ravaged Mumbai in November 2008.

The foreign ministry had reservations about having Malik over at this juncture, and his conduct may validate the misgivings. He twice cited killing of Pakistani citizens in Samjhauta blast almost as a counterpoise to the terrorist attack on Mumbai, besides, predictably, rejecting India's argument that it had given enough material to Pakistan to act against Lashkar chief Hafiz Saeed.

Reacting to his comments, former Indian high commissioner to Pakistan G Parthasarthy said, "This shows the folly of inviting a Pakistani leader without any political standing who would only try to appease domestic opinion and the army."

The remarks Malik made earlier, at the airport on his arrival, on Captain Saurabh Kalia of Indian Army could also have been better framed. Kalia was tortured and his body mutilated after he was abducted and killed by Pakistani troops during the Kargil war in May 1999. Malik's arrival coincided with the Supreme Court issuing a notice to the Centre on a petition by Kalia's father that Pakistan be tried in the International Court of Justice for violation of Vienna rules on the humanitarian treatment of prisoners of war.

Asked about it, Malik started alright. He pleaded ignorance of the facts of the case but said he would be happy to meet Kalia's father. "Whenever any human being dies nobody hesitates to say sorry for that," he said. However, Malik went on to add that he was not aware whether Kalia died of a Pakistani bullet or just fell victim to harsh weather: a formulation which seemed insensitive considering the tell-tale marks of torture on Kalia's body.

The Pakistani minister said his government wanted to work on improving bilateral ties and even suggested that India should move beyond 26/11, asserting that "Pakistan will leave no stone unturned to punish those involved in the Mumbai terror attack". He further said, "We can work together not only for peace in Pakistan and India but also for the region."

Malik's remarks are not a happy augury for the patient fence-mending the two countries have been engaged in. In fact, his hosts in the home ministry looked distinctly awkward and the atmospherics tense as Malik spoke.

Shinde, who appeared to have been caught unawares, gathered his nerves to tell Malik that Pakistan needed to make good its promise to bring to book the 26/11 masterminds, stressing that it has not been fulfilled yet. "You have been outspoken on all fronts. But we in India keep on talking that earlier on several occasions, the promises were made and that (they) were not fulfilled. Today, you have made the promise again. I am quite confident that both the countries will go forward in bilateral cooperation," he said.

Importantly, however, Malik made it plain that India could not expect any concessions from Pakistan on the issue of its failure to punish Lashkar chief Saeed and other 26/11 masterminds. He cited three court orders exonerating Saeed. He said Pakistan could not go by just the statement of Ajmal Kasab or India's dossier on the Laskhar chief, ignoring India's contention that it had given enough material to Pakistan to probe Saeed's role.

He spoke of propaganda, blamed the tension between the neighbours on non-state actors and tried to draw equivalence between Saeed and the killing of Pakistani nationals in the bomb attack on Samjhauta Express. "I have been receiving dossiers with only information," Malik said at the airport, echoing Pakistan's charge that India has given no evidence on Saeed's complicity in the attack on Mumbai.

He continued in the same vein when he addressed reporters after inaugurating the new visa regime. "I know there have been questions on Hafiz Saeed and obviously this is the demand from the people of India. Exactly in the same way, when the Samjhauta blast happened, people of Pakistan were actually asking what had happened," he said.


Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 9,2024

arvind.jpg

The Delhi High Court rejected Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's plea challenging his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and remand order passed by the trial court in connection with the excise policy case. The court delivered the verdict in the excise policy case on Tuesday.

In its order, the high court said the petition challenged the arrest and said it was in violation of Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). "The court clarifies that the plea is not for bail but for declaring the arrest illegal," Bar and Bench reported while citing the court order.

The high court said the material collected by the ED “reveals Arvind Kejriwal conspired and was actively involved in use and concealment of proceeds of crime." 

“The ED case also reveals that he was involved in his personal capacity as well as convenor of AAP," the order said.

Kejriwal had earlier questioned the timing of the arrest that came just ahead of the Lok Sabha Elections 2024.  Reacting to this, the court said, “Petitioner has been arrested in money laundering case and court has to examine his arrest and remand as per law irrespective of timing of elections."

Reacting to Kejriwal's argument casting doubt on the statements of “approvers" in the excise policy case, the court said the statements of “Raghav Magunta and Sarath Reddy are approver statements which were recorded under the PMLA as well as Section 164 CrPC".

“To cast doubt on the manner of recording statement of approver would amount to casting aspersions on the court and judge," the order added. “The law of approver is over 100 years old and not one year old. It cannot be suggested that it was enacted to implicate the present petitioner (Kejriwal)," it added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 7,2024

mamata.jpg

Purulia: West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Sunday alleged the central investigating agencies were asking TMC leaders to either join the BJP or face action.

Addressing an election rally in Purulia district, she alleged agencies such as the ED, CBI, NIA and the I-T Department were working as 'arms' of the BJP.

"Agencies such as the NIA, ED and CBI are being used to harass TMC leaders. They are carrying out raids without prior information, and barging into houses. What the women would do if someone entered their house when everyone was asleep in the dead of night?" she asked.

Banerjee was referring to Saturday's incident in Bhupatinagar where a team of the NIA was attacked by a mob when it went to arrest two accused in a blast case.

"The agencies are asking our leaders and activists to either join the BJP or face action," she alleged.

Asking people not to fall for any provocation, Banerjee alleged the BJP was fanning communal passions during Ram Navami.

The chief minister also accused the BJP-led government at the Centre of depriving West Bengal of funds for MGNREGA and PM-Awas schemes.

She said the state government will provide Rs 1.2 lakh for building houses for the poor.

"The EC will not give permission to us to give the money now. After the elections, we will construct the houses of the poor," she said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
April 5,2024

SCmadrasa.jpg

New Delhi, Apr 5: In a big relief to about 17 lakh madrassa students in Uttar Pradesh, the Supreme Court today paused an Allahabad High Court order scrapping the UP Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004. This allows about 16,000 madrasas in the state to continue functioning under the 2004 law.

A bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud said that the high court decision was prima facie not correct and issued notices to the UP and central governments, and the Madrassa board.

The high court had last month declared the 2004 law "unconstitutional" for allegedly violating the principle of secularism and directed the government to accommodate the madrasa students in the formal education system.

The Supreme Court put it on hold on Friday, saying that the aims and objectives of the Madrassa Board are regulatory in nature and that the establishment of the board itself will not affect secularism.

"The high court, in striking down the provisions of the Act, directed the relocation of the students. This would affect the 17 lakh students. We are of the view that the direction of relocation of students to other schools was not warranted," said the Chief Justice.

If the purpose of the PIL is to ensure that madrassas provide secular education in core subjects such as mathematics, science, history, and languages, the solution would not be to repeal the provisions of the Madarsa Act 2004, he added.

The central and state governments backed the high court judgment in the Supreme Court, with the centre saying suspected entanglement of religion and other relevant issues must be debated.

Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing the madrassas, said religious education cannot mean religious instruction and that the high court order will leave 10,000 madrassa teachers and 17 lakh students in lurch. But the state government said it has made arrangements for the teachers and students.

Mr Singhvi argued it is wrong to say madrassa education doesn't have quality, isn't universal in nature, and is not broad-based. Singling out the madrassas for a ban is discriminatory and the Supreme Court had said so in the Aruna Roy vs Union of India, 2002 verdict, he pointed out.

The Chief Justice said that the issues that have been raised merit closer reflection and posted the matter for further hearing in the second week of July.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.