Snatch voting rights, govt jobs of people with more than two kids: Ramdev

Agencies
January 24, 2019

Aligarh, Jan 24: Ramdev, who has always expressed concern over controlling population in the country, has advised that the government should snatch away the voting rights of people who go for more than two children.

Citing the rising population of India as reason for need of such actions, Ramdev at an event in Aligarh on Wednesday, said: "To control population of the country, voting rights, jobs and treatment facilities should be taken away from people who give birth to more than two kids and whether they are Hindus or Muslims. Then only the population will be controlled."

While inaugurating Patanjali garment in Aligarh, Ramdev, a bachelor himself told media that such people should not be allowed to contest elections, denied admissions in government schools, do not seek treatment in a government hospital and not allowed to take government jobs.

This was not the first time when the yog guru had made such statement. In November last year, he said that people like him, who do not get married, should be accorded special honours.

"In this country, people like me, who never get married, should receive a special honour. Those who get married and produce more than two children should be denied voting rights," Ramdev said at an event.

Comments

Ajith kumar
 - 
Thursday, 24 Jan 2019

COW Urine problem............ 

 

 

 
if anyone habit of drinking cow urine, then he start to call his father  ' WHO ARE YOU?  Did we meet before? '

wellwisher
 - 
Thursday, 24 Jan 2019

Use less are feeding to thier children or they  asked your help.  Brain less fellow barking with influence of his god fathers funding.

Wait n see your days are nearing. Dhood Ka Dhood Paani Ka  Paani

kumar
 - 
Thursday, 24 Jan 2019

This baba is agent of Sangh parivar and trying to fool people.   He should be grateful to Almighty God for his creation.    shame on you  baba.   If you are a real Sadhu you should go and live in Jungle and not in 5 star hotels

Anti-Na Mardh baba
 - 
Thursday, 24 Jan 2019

costaldigest.com is anti nationilist website, ban

 

or go to pakistan

 

ahmed ali k
 - 
Thursday, 24 Jan 2019

Joke of the mellenium

Actually its not his fault because he don't know about wife or kids

can anyone ask him to enter wedlock, then he will come to know what is kids and how much people expect.

Anti-Na Mardh baba
 - 
Thursday, 24 Jan 2019

children are gift of god, only true parent will understand, not these people who talk about nationilism & spread corruption.

 

Mohammad
 - 
Thursday, 24 Jan 2019

Election time...Feku Baba

Mohammed SS
 - 
Thursday, 24 Jan 2019

However you are mixing cow urine in your product now please start mixing poison also along with Cow urine in your product and see how automatically population will come down

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
December 21,2025

hadith.jpg

Invoking the teachings of Prophet Muhammad—“pay the worker before his sweat dries”—the Madras High Court has directed a municipal corporation to settle long-pending legal dues owed to a former counsel. The court observed that this principle reflects basic fairness and applies equally to labour and service-related disputes.

Justice G. R. Swaminathan made the observation while hearing a petition filed by advocate P. Thirumalai, who claimed that the Madurai City Municipal Corporation failed to pay him legal fees amounting to ₹13.05 lakh. Earlier, the High Court had asked the corporation to consider his representation. However, a later order rejected a major portion of his claim, prompting the present petition.

The court allowed Thirumalai to approach the District Legal Services Authority (DLSA) and submit a list of cases in which he had appeared. It also directed the corporation to settle the verified fee bills within two months, without interest. The court noted that the petitioner had waited nearly 18 years before challenging the non-payment and that the corporation could not be fully blamed, as the fee bills were not submitted properly.

‘A Matter of Embarrassment’

Justice Swaminathan described it as a “matter of embarrassment” that the State has nearly a dozen Additional Advocate Generals. He observed that appointing too many law officers often leads to unnecessary allocation of work and frequent adjournments, as government counsel claim that senior officers are engaged elsewhere.

He expressed hope that such practices would end at least in the Madurai Bench of the High Court and added that Additional Advocate Generals should “turn a new leaf” from 2026 onwards.

‘Scandalously High Amounts’

While stating that the court cannot examine the exact fees paid to senior counsel or law officers, Justice Swaminathan stressed that good governance requires public funds to be used prudently. He expressed concern over the “scandalously high amounts” paid by government and quasi-government bodies to a few favoured law officers.

In contrast, the court noted that Thirumalai’s total claim was “a pittance” considering the large number of cases he had handled.

Background

Thirumalai served as the standing counsel for the Madurai City Municipal Corporation for more than 14 years, from 1992 to 2006. During this period, he represented the corporation in about 818 cases before the Madurai District Courts.

As the former counsel was unable to hire a clerk to obtain certified copies of judgments in all 818 cases, the court directed the District Legal Services Authority to collect the certified copies within two months. The court further ordered the corporation to bear the cost incurred by the DLSA and deduct that amount from the final settlement payable to the petitioner.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.