Govt defends fare hike, says rail subsidy burden was too heavy

June 22, 2014

New Delhi, Jun 22: Amid protests over a sharp hike in fares and criticism of political parties, the government on Saturday strongly defended the increase in passenger fares, including for short-distance travel, arguing the revision was long overdue as the last hike took place around 11 years ago and a heavy subsidy burden was "unsustainable" in the wake of soaring costs.

rail fairs
While passengers travelling by sub-urban and short-haul trains account for 52% of the traffic, their share in total passenger revenues was around 6-7%. This segment accounted for around 60% of the annual subsidy of Rs 26,000 crore, top-ranking officials said, while justifying Friday's fare hike announcement.

'Fare still includes 50% subsidy on season tickets'

"There is some discomfort among passengers, but an element of rationality has to be brought in as tickets are very low priced. Even after the increase, those travelling on season tickets will pay half the normal fare," Railway Board chairman Arunendra Kumar said. For years, freight traffic has subsidized passenger operations, resulting in companies shifting consignments to road.

Political parties ranging from Congress, Left, Samajwadi Party, BSP to BJP's own allies like Shiv Sena have criticized the increase in passenger fares with cities having well developed suburban networks bearing the brunt. But a day after the hikes were announced, the government did not seem ready to yield ground.

Finance minister Arun Jaitley, who is due to soon present the Modi government's first budget, defended the move to raise tariffs. "The Indian Railways for the last few years have been running at a loss. The only way that railways can survive is when users pay for the facilities that they avail. The passenger services have been subsidized by the freight traffic... A loss making railway will provide below-par services. It will eventually not even have the resources to pay its bill. India must decide whether it wants a world class railway or a ramshackled one. The railway minister has taken a difficult but a correct decision," the minister said in a Facebook post.

The decision to raise passenger fares and freight charges is seen as part of the "bitter medicine" Prime Minister Narendra Modi said was necessary to set right faltering finances that he said were aggravated by UPA's mismanagement of the economy — a charge denied by former finance minister P Chidambaram.

Jaitley's statement came as political parties, including allies such as Shiv Sena, went public with their protest.

But the railways felt it has strong reasons to argue its case. Chairman Arunendra Kumar contended that the fare still included at least 50% subsidy for season tickets, and the actual increase is not significant, although it may look steep in percentage terms.

"It is not a very significant increase, although some people are complaining," DP Pande, member (traffic) in the railway board said, adding that the rise will only partially offset the state-run transporter's loss.

Railways is expected to mop up around Rs 9,200 crore from the Friday's decision to increase passenger fares by 14.2% in all classes while freight charge was hiked by 6.5% with effect from June 25.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
December 6,2025

pilot.jpg

New Delhi: IndiGo, India’s largest airline, faced major operational turbulence this week after failing to prepare for new pilot-fatigue regulations issued by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA). The stricter rules—designed to improve flight safety—took effect in phases through 2024, with the latest implementation on November 1. IndiGo has acknowledged that inadequate roster planning led to widespread cancellations and delays.

Below are the key DGCA rules that affected IndiGo’s operations:

1. Longer Mandatory Weekly Rest

Weekly rest for pilots has been increased from 36 hours to 48 hours.

The government says the extended break is essential to curb cumulative fatigue. This rule remains in force despite the current crisis.

2. Cap on Night Landings

Pilots can now perform only two night landings per week—a steep reduction from the earlier limit of six.

Night hours, defined as midnight to early morning, are considered the least alert period for pilots.

Given the disruptions, this rule has been temporarily relaxed for IndiGo until February 10.

3. Reduced Maximum Night Flight Duty

Flight duty that stretches into the night is now capped at 10 hours.

This measure has also been kept on hold for IndiGo until February 10 to stabilize operations.

4. Weekly Rest Cannot Be Replaced With Personal Leave

Airlines can no longer count a pilot’s personal leave as part of the mandatory 48-hour rest.

Pilots say this closes a loophole that previously reduced actual rest time.

Currently, all airlines are exempt from this rule to normalise travel.

5. Mandatory Fatigue Monitoring

Airlines must submit quarterly fatigue reports along with corrective actions to DGCA.

This system aims to create a transparent fatigue-tracking framework across the industry.

The DGCA has stressed that these rules were crafted to strengthen flight safety and align India with global fatigue-management standards. The temporary relaxations are expected to remain until February 2025, giving IndiGo time to stabilise its schedules and restore normal air travel.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
December 16,2025

bengal.jpg

The deletion of over 58 lakh names from West Bengal’s draft electoral rolls following a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) has sparked widespread concern and is likely to deepen political tensions in the poll-bound state.

According to the Election Commission, the revision exercise has identified 24 lakh voters as deceased, 19 lakh as relocated, 12 lakh as missing, and 1.3 lakh as duplicate entries. The draft list, published after the completion of the first phase of SIR, aims to remove errors and duplication from the electoral rolls.

However, the scale of deletions has raised fears that a large number of eligible voters may have been wrongly excluded. The Election Commission has said that individuals whose names are missing can file objections and seek corrections. The final voter list is scheduled to be published in February next year, after which the Assembly election announcement is expected. Notably, the last Special Intensive Revision in Bengal was conducted in 2002.

The development has intensified the political row over the SIR process. Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee and her Trinamool Congress have strongly opposed the exercise, accusing the Centre and the Election Commission of attempting to disenfranchise lakhs of voters ahead of the elections.

Addressing a rally in Krishnanagar earlier this month, Banerjee urged people to protest if their names were removed from the voter list, alleging intimidation during elections and warning of serious consequences if voting rights were taken away.

The BJP, meanwhile, has defended the revision and accused the Trinamool Congress of politicising the issue to protect what it claims is an illegal voter base. Leader of the Opposition Suvendu Adhikari alleged that the ruling party fears losing power due to the removal of deceased, fake, and illegal voters.

The controversy comes amid earlier allegations by the Trinamool Congress that excessive work pressure during the SIR led to the deaths by suicide of some Booth Level Officers (BLOs), for which the party blamed the Election Commission. With the draft list now out, another round of political confrontation appears imminent.

As objections begin to be filed, the focus will be on whether the correction mechanism is accessible, transparent, and timely—critical factors in ensuring that no eligible voter is denied their democratic right ahead of a crucial election.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.