High Court dismisses PIL for ban on burqa, other face veils in Delhi

November 15, 2016

New Delhi, Nov 15: The Delhi High Court on Tuesday refused to entertain a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking a ban on burqas and other face veils in public places due to security threat to the capital, saying it is not a public interest matter.

burqa
A bench of chief justice G. Rohini and justice Sangeeta Dhingra Sehgal dismissed the plea saying, “If it is a policy decision, the government will take care of it. How can we entertain it (PIL) under Article 226 (power of high courts to issue certain writs)?” the bench said.

“We cannot interfere in this writ petition. The same is dismissed. It is not an issue which deserves consideration by this court under the Article. It is not a matter of public interest,” it observed.

The plea sought a ban on wearing face veils including burqas, helmets, hoods, among others at public places like transport, government buildings and heritage sites in the capital on the ground of threat from terror activities.

The plea, filed by Sardar Ravi Ranjan Singh, alleged “the use of face coverings and wearing of full body cover like the burqa is a serious security issue and citizens are put to constant risk and fear in the capital which is in violation of Article 21(protection of life and personal liberty) of the Constitution of India.” It said, “There is a rapid growth in terrorist activities and that the perpetrators of these criminal acts show no respect to burqa and ruthlessly use it as an instrument to carry outfidayeen' attacks.”

The petitioner also referred to the recent attacks in Uri in Jammu and Kashmir and said public safety and the government offices in the capital are at constant risk. “Face veils, burqas can be used to prevent identification at border check-posts, etc. Further, criminals and extremists can use burqas to skip checking at police posts and barricades,” the PIL, which made centre, Delhi government and National Security Council as parties, said.

Comments

Ansari
 - 
Tuesday, 15 Nov 2016

Law is not so week that Naren can peep and modify

vijay
 - 
Tuesday, 15 Nov 2016

ZAKIR NAIKS ARE BACK WITH A BANG...

Mohammed SS
 - 
Tuesday, 15 Nov 2016

Burnol is not sufficient for BJP/RSS Goondas, Singapore Guy need special Vaseline gelly together with so the thing should get in easily to his......

Althaf
 - 
Tuesday, 15 Nov 2016

Naren
Do not commit suicide after reading this... I can understand how you are feeling right now.

abdullah
 - 
Tuesday, 15 Nov 2016

Mr. Singh better go naked in public places to avoid weapons inside your Kakhi chaddi.

Sahil
 - 
Tuesday, 15 Nov 2016

Burnol is on high demand.. Many quantities ordered by Singapore guy :D :D lol..

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
December 7,2025

Mangaluru, Dec 7: A 34-year-old fruit and vegetable trader in Mangaluru has reportedly lost ₹33.1 lakh after falling victim to an online investment scam run through a fake mobile app.

Police said the scam began in September, when the victim received a link on Facebook. Clicking it connected him to a WhatsApp number, where an unidentified person introduced a high-return investment scheme and instructed him to download an app.

To build trust, the fraudster asked him to invest ₹30,000 on September 24. The trader soon received ₹34,000 as “profit,” convincing him the scheme was genuine. Over the next two months, he transferred money in multiple instalments via Google Pay and IMPS to different scanner codes and bank accounts shared by the scammers. Between September 24 and December 3, he ended up sending a total of ₹33.1 lakh.

When he later requested a refund of his investment and promised returns, the scammers demanded additional payments, claiming he needed to pay a “service tax” first. Even after he paid a small amount, no money was returned, and the scammers continued pressuring him for more.

A case has been registered at the CEN Crime Police Station.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.