High Court orders floor test in Uttarakhand Assembly on March 31

March 29, 2016

Nainital, Mar 29: The Uttarakhand High Court today ordered a floor test in the Assembly on March 31, giving a new turn to the political events in the state where President's Rule was imposed on Sunday.

Assembly
All MLAs, including the nine ruling Congress rebels, can participate in the trial of strength but the votes of the disqualified legislators will be kept separate.

They will be taken into account subject to final outcome of the writ filed petition by Chief Minister Harish Rawat challenging the imposition of President's Rule, senior Supreme Court lawyer and Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi told reporters after the second day of the hearing here.

The High Court ordered the DGP to ensure security in the Assembly when the floor test is carried out.

Rawat, whose government was sacked on Sunday on the grounds of "breakdown of Constitutional machinery", had moved the court yesterday, calling the Centre's decision as "arbitrary" and demanded its quashing.

Singhvi said the court accepted Congress position that despite the President's Rule, there is enough scope for judicial review to allow a floor test, which was sought by it.

He said Governor K K Paul too had directed holding of the floor test on March 28 and Rawat had also made the same demand twice.

"Now only the date has changed from March 28 to March 31," Singhvi said. He said mere allegations of horse-trading cannot justify the imposition of President's Rule and stop a floor test.

The Centre had imposed the President's Rule just a day ahead of the date (March 28) fixed for the floor test.

On the question of disqualification of 9 rebel Congress MLAs, Singhvi said the court did not set it aside and a final decision on it will come later. He said both the sides would consider their future legal recourse.

Singhvi said for purpose of counting, the votes of the disqualified MLAs will be kept separate and will be subjected to final outcome of the case. "The votes will not be taken as valid votes till then," the Congress lawyer said.

The political crisis in the state arose after nine Congress MLAs voted with the BJP against the Appropriation Bill on March 18 which the Speaker declared as passed, ignoring demands for Division.

Following this, Speaker Govind Singh Kunjwal issued notices to the nine rebel Congress MLAs under the anti-defection law as to why they should not be disqualified.

Even as there were reports that the rebels were disqualified, on Saturday night the Union Cabinet met and considered the Governor's report which had spoken about a breakdown in governance and expressed apprehensions of a possible pandemonium in the House during the floor test on March 28.

The Union Cabinet recommended to President Pranab Mukherjee bringing the state under President's Rule by invoking Article 356 of the Constitution, which he signed on Sunday.

After the state was brought under the central rule, the Speaker disqualified the nine rebel Congress MLAs.

Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley, who had met the President on Sunday night and briefed him on the Cabinet decision, later justified the imposition of President's Rule, saying the Congress "plunged the State into a serious constitutional crisis by continuing a Government which should have quit after the failure of the Appropriation Bill".

To further complicate the crisis, "the Chief Minister started allurement, horse-trading and disqualification with a view to altering the composition of the House", he had said.

"After the Assembly has been put under suspended animation and the decision has been made public, the Speaker has decided to disqualify some Members. The constitutional breakdown has been compounded further by this action," he had said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
December 16,2025

bengal.jpg

The deletion of over 58 lakh names from West Bengal’s draft electoral rolls following a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) has sparked widespread concern and is likely to deepen political tensions in the poll-bound state.

According to the Election Commission, the revision exercise has identified 24 lakh voters as deceased, 19 lakh as relocated, 12 lakh as missing, and 1.3 lakh as duplicate entries. The draft list, published after the completion of the first phase of SIR, aims to remove errors and duplication from the electoral rolls.

However, the scale of deletions has raised fears that a large number of eligible voters may have been wrongly excluded. The Election Commission has said that individuals whose names are missing can file objections and seek corrections. The final voter list is scheduled to be published in February next year, after which the Assembly election announcement is expected. Notably, the last Special Intensive Revision in Bengal was conducted in 2002.

The development has intensified the political row over the SIR process. Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee and her Trinamool Congress have strongly opposed the exercise, accusing the Centre and the Election Commission of attempting to disenfranchise lakhs of voters ahead of the elections.

Addressing a rally in Krishnanagar earlier this month, Banerjee urged people to protest if their names were removed from the voter list, alleging intimidation during elections and warning of serious consequences if voting rights were taken away.

The BJP, meanwhile, has defended the revision and accused the Trinamool Congress of politicising the issue to protect what it claims is an illegal voter base. Leader of the Opposition Suvendu Adhikari alleged that the ruling party fears losing power due to the removal of deceased, fake, and illegal voters.

The controversy comes amid earlier allegations by the Trinamool Congress that excessive work pressure during the SIR led to the deaths by suicide of some Booth Level Officers (BLOs), for which the party blamed the Election Commission. With the draft list now out, another round of political confrontation appears imminent.

As objections begin to be filed, the focus will be on whether the correction mechanism is accessible, transparent, and timely—critical factors in ensuring that no eligible voter is denied their democratic right ahead of a crucial election.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.