Kangaroo court in WB orders gang-rape, murder of teenager

September 4, 2014

Kolkata, Sep 4: As punishment for his failure to pay the rent for a tractor, a kangaroo court ordered the gang-rape and murder of a farmer’s 17-year-old daughter, who had tried to save her father from being beaten up by locals.

Kangaroo court
The naked body of the girl was found on Wednesday near railways tracks at Dhupguri in the Jalpaiguri district of North Bengal, a day after she had gone missing.

The kangaroo court in the girl’s village was being overseen by a local Trinamool Congress councillor and her husband. The police believe that the girl was gang-raped and murdered for intervening when locals tried to rough up her father on Monday.

A senior police official said the victim’s father identified her body on Wednesday afternoon and lodged an FIR at the Dhupguri police station against 13 people for rape, murder and kidnap. The body has already been sent for postmortem and the police have detained two persons in connection with the case.

Officials said the trouble began on Monday, when the farmer’s request for more time to make the payment was turned down by the kangaroo court. The girl went missing on Tuesday night, after which Superintendent of Police Kunal Agarwal and Additional Superintendent James Kujur reached the village.

The police said the local Trinamool councillor and her husband were present when the girl came out of her house and pleaded with the kangaroo court not to beat up her father on Monday.

Officials believe she was ushered out of the meeting by a person known to her before she went missing.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
December 21,2025

hadith.jpg

Invoking the teachings of Prophet Muhammad—“pay the worker before his sweat dries”—the Madras High Court has directed a municipal corporation to settle long-pending legal dues owed to a former counsel. The court observed that this principle reflects basic fairness and applies equally to labour and service-related disputes.

Justice G. R. Swaminathan made the observation while hearing a petition filed by advocate P. Thirumalai, who claimed that the Madurai City Municipal Corporation failed to pay him legal fees amounting to ₹13.05 lakh. Earlier, the High Court had asked the corporation to consider his representation. However, a later order rejected a major portion of his claim, prompting the present petition.

The court allowed Thirumalai to approach the District Legal Services Authority (DLSA) and submit a list of cases in which he had appeared. It also directed the corporation to settle the verified fee bills within two months, without interest. The court noted that the petitioner had waited nearly 18 years before challenging the non-payment and that the corporation could not be fully blamed, as the fee bills were not submitted properly.

‘A Matter of Embarrassment’

Justice Swaminathan described it as a “matter of embarrassment” that the State has nearly a dozen Additional Advocate Generals. He observed that appointing too many law officers often leads to unnecessary allocation of work and frequent adjournments, as government counsel claim that senior officers are engaged elsewhere.

He expressed hope that such practices would end at least in the Madurai Bench of the High Court and added that Additional Advocate Generals should “turn a new leaf” from 2026 onwards.

‘Scandalously High Amounts’

While stating that the court cannot examine the exact fees paid to senior counsel or law officers, Justice Swaminathan stressed that good governance requires public funds to be used prudently. He expressed concern over the “scandalously high amounts” paid by government and quasi-government bodies to a few favoured law officers.

In contrast, the court noted that Thirumalai’s total claim was “a pittance” considering the large number of cases he had handled.

Background

Thirumalai served as the standing counsel for the Madurai City Municipal Corporation for more than 14 years, from 1992 to 2006. During this period, he represented the corporation in about 818 cases before the Madurai District Courts.

As the former counsel was unable to hire a clerk to obtain certified copies of judgments in all 818 cases, the court directed the District Legal Services Authority to collect the certified copies within two months. The court further ordered the corporation to bear the cost incurred by the DLSA and deduct that amount from the final settlement payable to the petitioner.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.