Opposition slams government on price rise

July 9, 2014

Arun Jaitley
New Delhi, Jul 9: Government on Wednesday came under scathing attack from the opposition on the issue of price rise with members taking a dig at BJP, wondering where the “achche din” (good days), promised by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, have gone.

In a discussion on price rise, they expressed concern over rising prices of essential commodities and asked the government to act against hoarders to contain inflation.

Initiating a discussion in Lok Sabha, Congress leader Amarinder Singh also demanded a complete ban on onion export to control its soaring prices.

The discussion under a rule that does not entail voting was taken up after Speaker Sumitra Mahajan rejected the opposition notices on an adjournment motion on the issue and said she was ready to have a general discussion.

He asked “where is the achche din” promised by BJP during election campaign and slammed Finance Minister Arun Jaitley’s statement that food prices are under control and there is no need to panic.

Mr. Singh said the farmers who produce vegetables including potatoes, onion and tomatoes were selling their produce at low price and hoarders and middlemen were responsible for shooting up of prices such essential commodities.

“There has been a 250 per cent increase in the prices of onion, tomatoes and potatoes. Have you taken any step against middlemen? ...Tackle hoarding to control prices in the short run. I hope the government will take action against hoarders,” he said.

BJP hit back, with its member Anurag Thakur saying the price rise being witnessed currently was a result of policies of the previous Congress-led government.

He said prices of essential commodities were being kept under check by Narendra Modi government in total contrast to Manmohan Singh government when prices of food items rose manifold.

The CPI(M) member P. Karunakaran, interestingly, criticised Congress for raising the issue of price rise, saying its government did not take any “concrete” action to control inflation during its 10-year rule.

“Why did not you take steps in 10 years. You were not ready to take any concrete step to control price rise. You were not ready to listen,” he told Congress members who were attacking the Narendra Modi government over the issue.

The MP from Kerala reminded the government that it had come to power raising the issue of price rise and said Modi should show sincerity in fulfilling election promises and look after the interests of the poor.

He referred to 6.5 per cent recent hike in freight rates, saying such steps have a cascading effect and finally lead to increase in the prices of essential commodities.

“I want to know whether you have political will to reduce excise duty, reduce VAT and change tax structure as promised during the last Lok Sabha elections,” he said, a day ahead of the presentation of the General Budget.

Drawing attention towards the rising prices of onion, Amarinder Singh, Congress Deputy Leader in the Lok Sabha, said government was still exporting the vegetable and demanded its complete ban.

The former Punjab Chief Minister said the prices have been going up since the Modi government took over.

Citing the continuous rise in prices of petrol and diesel, Singh said this was also one of the main reasons for the rising prices of food articles.

”...Anything that is transported...the prices will automatically go up...What about the promises you have made to the people (during election campaign),” he asked.

He said that it was not only vegetables, prices of wheat and rice were also going up.

Amarinder Singh said the government should come up with a price support mechanism for the benefit of farming community.

He termed as “ridiculous” Finance Minister Arun Jaitley’s recent statement that there is no need to panic, contending that all sections including daily wage earners, salaried class and 400 million people living Below Poverty Line were worried over price rise.

Mr. Singh also expressed concern over reports of NDA government planning to do away with pro-poor measures brought by the previous UPA government including MNREGA and Food Security Act.

Mr. Thakur said Congress should not talk about price rise as it did nothing to control inflation during the 10 years when it was in power.

“When they (Congress) talk about price, it is a self-goal. It is really painful to hear you talking on price rise. If someone is responsible for price rise, it is you (Congress),” the BJP leader said.

“What did we get as a legacy of the UPA government? We got empty coffers,” he said.

Thakur said during the 10 years rule of UPA, Parliament had discussed the issue of price rise 17 times, while during the six years rule of Atal Bihar Vajpayee led NDA, there was just one discussion on price rise.

“Despite having an economist Prime Minister, you could not change the economic situation of the country. You have changed the Finance Minister several times, but you could not change the economy,” he said.

Apparently taking a dig at Amarinder Singh without taking his name, Mr. Thakur said it was heartening to hear “maharajas” talk about “daal, roti”. Mr. Singh is the erstwhile maharaja of Patiala in Punjab.

This invited strong protest by Leader of Congress Mallikarjun Kharge, who said Mr. Thakur was making personal attack on Singh while he should be talking on policies.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
December 13,2025

New Delhi: School-going children are picking up drug and smoking habits and engaging in consumption of alcohol, with the average age of introduction to such harmful substances found to be around 13 years, suggesting a need for earlier interventions as early as primary school, a multi-city survey by AIIMS-Delhi said.

The findings also showed substance use increased in higher grades, with grade XI/XII students two times more likely to report use of substances when compared with grade VIII students. This emphasised the importance of continued prevention and intervention through middle and high school.

The study led by Dr Anju Dhawan of AIIMS's National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, published in the National Medical Journal of India this month, looks at adolescent substance use across diverse regions.

The survey included 5,920 students from classes 8, 9, 11 and 12 in urban government, private and rural schools across 10 cities -- Bengaluru, Chandigarh, Delhi, Dibrugarh, Hyderabad, Imphal, Jammu, Lucknow, Mumbai, and Ranchi. The data were collected between May 2018 and June 2019.

The average age of initiation for any substance was 12.9 (2.8) years. It was lowest for inhalants (11.3 years) followed by heroin (12.3 years) and opioid pharmaceuticals (without prescription; 12.5 years).

Overall, 15.1 per cent of participants reported lifetime use, 10.3 per cent reported past year use, and 7.2 per cent reported use in the past month of any substance, the study found.

The most common substances used in the past year, after tobacco (4 per cent) and alcohol (3.8 per cent), were opioids (2.8 per cent), followed by cannabis (2 per cent) and inhalants (1.9 per cent). Use of non-prescribed pharmaceutical opioids was most common among opioid users (90.2 per cent).

On being asked, 'Do you think this substance is easily available for a person of your age' separately for each substance category, nearly half the students (46.3 per cent) endorsed that tobacco products and more than one-third of the students (36.5 per cent) agreed that a person of their age can easily procure alcohol products.

Similarly, for Bhang (21.9 per cent), ganja/charas (16.1 per cent), inhalants (15.2 per cent), sedatives (13.7 per cent), opium and heroin (10 per cent each), the students endorsed that these can be easily procured.

About 95 per cent of the children, irrespective of their grade, agreed with the statement that 'drug use is harmful'.

The rates of substance use (any) among boys were significantly higher than those of girls for substance use (ever), use in the past year and use in the past 30 days. Compared to grade VIII students, grade IX students were more likely, and grade XI/XII students were twice as likely to have used any substance (ever).

The likelihood of past-year use of any substance was also higher for grade IX students and for grade XI/XII students as compared to grade VIII students.

About 40 per cent of students mentioned that they had a family member who used tobacco or alcohol each. The use of cannabis (any product) and opioid (any product) by a family member was reported by 8.2 per cent and 3.9 per cent of students, respectively, while the use of other substances, such as inhalants/sedatives by family was 2-3 per cent, the study found.

A relatively smaller percentage of students reported use of tobacco or alcohol among peers as compared to among family members, while a higher percentage reported inhalants, sedatives, cannabis or opioid use among peers.

Children using substances (past year) compared to non-users reported significantly higher any substance use by their family members and peers.

There were 25.7 per cent students who replied 'yes' to the question 'conflicts/fights often occur in your family'. Most students also replied affirmatively to 'family members are aware of how their time is being spent' and 'damily members are aware of with whom they spend their time'.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.