Rahul Gandhi to be 'more active' in future, says Cong

May 20, 2016

New Delhi, May 20: Amid questions over Rahul Gandhi's leadership after poll debacle, Congress today signalled that the national leadership is not washing off its hands even as it insisted that the party Vice President took no decision on his own and that he would be "more active" in the future.

After senior leader Digvijay Singh stirred the hornet's nest by talking about the need for "major surgery", the party said a meeting of the Congress Working Committee (CWC), the highest decision-making body, will be convened soon to discuss the poll outcome and the future course of action.

However, efforts to shield Rahul Gandhi continued, with party spokesman P C Chacko saying he had not taken a single decision on his own and that it was the state units where poll strategy was decided as per the local conditions.

"We had given full freedom to state units to decide poll strategy...We are not saying national leadership is not responsible," Chacko told reporters while replying to a volley of questions on the poll drubbing.

The CWC had taken decisions on state elections as "ours is a federal system", he said.
On Digvijay Singh's pitch for "major surgery" which reflected an unease in the party, the spokesman said suggestions from senior leaders are welcome but "I wish suggestions are made inside the party fora".

He said a meeting of the CWC is expected to be held soon and the leaders can give their views there to facilitate a thorough debate.

The talk in the party is that the date and venue of an AICC meeting would be finailised at the meeting of the CWC.

"We in the Congress including Rahul Gandhi ...would be more active in the near future," Chacko said.

When a reporter sought to know whether the Congress would go into the role of Rahul Gandhi as the situation of the party has worsened since he became its Vice President, Chacko said that the impression might not be correct.

Suggesting that it was a collective responsibility in the party, he said Rahul Gandhi did not take a single decision on his own and had always kept the CWC on board.

Besides, Chacko said the party units in the states, where the polls were held, decided the strategy as per the local conditions and there was "no pressure" from the high command.

Citing the instance of Kerala, he said the party-led UDF headed by the outgoing Chief Minister Oomen Chandy decided strategy and "we are not disappointed as our vote share is intact" in the state.

Yesterday, the AICC had sought to throw a protective ring around Rahul Gandhi as it had rejected suggestions that the party Vice President should accept blame for the poll debacle.

Today, Chacko gave the impression that the party would soon be seen on the fast track based on the decisions taken to strengthen the organisation.

Comments

Add new comment

Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.

Over 58 lakh names dropped from draft voter list in Bengal ahead of polls

News Network

December 16,2025

The deletion of over 58 lakh names from West Bengal’s draft electoral rolls following a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) has sparked widespread concern and is likely to deepen political tensions in the poll-bound state.

According to the Election Commission, the revision exercise has identified 24 lakh voters as deceased, 19 lakh as relocated, 12 lakh as missing, and 1.3 lakh as duplicate entries. The draft list, published after the completion of the first phase of SIR, aims to remove errors and duplication from the electoral rolls.

However, the scale of deletions has raised fears that a large number of eligible voters may have been wrongly excluded. The Election Commission has said that individuals whose names are missing can file objections and seek corrections. The final voter list is scheduled to be published in February next year, after which the Assembly election announcement is expected. Notably, the last Special Intensive Revision in Bengal was conducted in 2002.

The development has intensified the political row over the SIR process. Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee and her Trinamool Congress have strongly opposed the exercise, accusing the Centre and the Election Commission of attempting to disenfranchise lakhs of voters ahead of the elections.

Addressing a rally in Krishnanagar earlier this month, Banerjee urged people to protest if their names were removed from the voter list, alleging intimidation during elections and warning of serious consequences if voting rights were taken away.

The BJP, meanwhile, has defended the revision and accused the Trinamool Congress of politicising the issue to protect what it claims is an illegal voter base. Leader of the Opposition Suvendu Adhikari alleged that the ruling party fears losing power due to the removal of deceased, fake, and illegal voters.

The controversy comes amid earlier allegations by the Trinamool Congress that excessive work pressure during the SIR led to the deaths by suicide of some Booth Level Officers (BLOs), for which the party blamed the Election Commission. With the draft list now out, another round of political confrontation appears imminent.

As objections begin to be filed, the focus will be on whether the correction mechanism is accessible, transparent, and timely—critical factors in ensuring that no eligible voter is denied their democratic right ahead of a crucial election.

Comments