SC asks Sahara Group to deposit Rs 10,000 crore to grant bail to Subrata Roy

March 26, 2014

Sahara_Group
New Delhi, Mar 26: The Supreme Court on Wednesday set a condition of depositing Rs 10,000 crore by Sahara Group for granting bail to Subrata Roy. The apex court agreed to defreeze bank accounts of Sahara companies to raise Rs 10,000 crore.

The court adjourned the case for tomorrow, asking the group to give details of the bank account numbers which are to be defreezed.

The Sahara group on Tuesday had made a fresh proposal before the Supreme Court for depositing Rs 20,000 crore investors' money with SEBI to secure release of its chief Subrata Roy who has been behind the bars along with company's two directors since March 4 when they were sent to judicial custody.

In the proposal, the group had assured the apex court to deposit Rs 2,500 crore within three working days and pay three instalments of Rs 3,500 cr each at the end of June, September, December and the remaining Rs 7,000 crore by March 31, 2015.

A bench of justices K S Radhakrishnan and J S Khehar, however, refused to take the proposal on record and asked the group to file the document in the registry after which it will consider.

The group, in its proposal, also said that it is willing to give an irrevocable bank guarantee at any time for any unpaid amount and sought court's permission to allow the group companies to operate bank accounts which have been frozen.

The group had earlier made a similar proposal by offering to make cash payment of Rs 2,500 crore within three days and Rs 14,900 crore in five instalments by the end of July, 2015. It had contended that only Rs 15,400 crore remained to be paid.

The apex court had rejected the proposal on March 7. The bench, however, continued with the hearing on maintainability of Roy's petition challenging his detention by the apex court.

Senior advocates Ram Jethmalani and C A Sundaram, appearing for the group and Roy, submitted that the apex court's order passed on March 4 is illegal and the plea be decided on merit.

SEBI had earlier contended that Roy's petition is not maintainable as he challenged the court's verdict by filing writ petition. It submitted that Roy can seek review of the order.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
December 15,2025

Udupi, Dec 15: What was meant to be a post-pilgrimage gathering turned tragic in Padukere village of Brahmavar taluk, Udupi district, late Sunday night, when a clash among youths escalated into a fatal assault, leaving one man dead.

The victim has been identified as 30-year-old Santosh Mogaveera, a resident of Padukere.

According to preliminary information, the incident took place during a late-night drinking party involving a group of local youths who had recently returned after completing their pilgrimage to the Sabarimala shrine. An argument reportedly broke out among the group and soon escalated into a violent confrontation.

During the ensuing brawl, Santosh Mogaveera was allegedly assaulted and collapsed at the spot after sustaining serious injuries. He was rushed by local residents to a private hospital in Brahmavar, where doctors declared him dead.

On receiving information, senior police officials, including Brahmavar Circle Inspector Gopikrishna, Kota Police Sub-Inspector Praveen Kumar T, Station ASI Manthesh Jabagoudar, and head constables Pradeep and Ashok, visited the spot and conducted an inspection.

Police have taken four youths into custody in connection with the incident. A case has been registered at the Kota police station, and further investigation is underway to ascertain the exact sequence of events leading to the death.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.