Concern over govt's move to handover Haji Abdullah's land to B R Shetty

[email protected] (CD Network)
September 3, 2016

Udupi, Sep 3: Activists and local organizations in Udupi have expressed concern over the State government's green signal to privatize a government hospital at Ajjarkad in Udupi by handing over its land to BRS Ventures Pvt Ltd, owned by Abu Dhabi-based Indian business tycoon B?R?Shetty.

brabdul
The State cabinet had recently given its in principal approval to hand over the land of maternity and pediatric hospital falling under the district hospital at Ajjarkad to Mr Shetty's firm. In fact the land was donated to the government decades ago by Late Haji Abdullah Kasim Saheb Bahadur, a well known philanthropist and founder of the Corporation Bank.

Activists in the region have taken to social media to slam the government's green signal for privatization of the hospital. The development is also being hotly discussed on a WhatsApp group.

Expressing his opposition to the government's move, former Udupi MLA Raghupathy Bhat of BJP recalled that the land for the hospital had been donated by Haji Saheb with an intention that a state-run hospital come up there. Mr Bhat has urged the government to reconsider its decision.

“If everything is going to be privatised, then why should the government exist”, questioned one Francis on twitter. “Private hospitals are after money. How can the poor get treatment in such hospitals”, tweeted Abdul?Sattar Ucchila.

Prof K?Paniraj, who began a discussion on the WhatsApp group, said it is unfortunate that in the name of service, hi-tech hospitals are being started by the rich denying the middle class and the poor access to hospitals where treatment is available at an affordable cost.

Another former MLA of Udupi, U?R?Sabhapathi recalled that the S?M?Krishna government had proposed to hand over the hospital to Kasturba Medical?College. However, the government withdrew its decision after there was a public outcry.

Meanwhile, Udupi Zilla Muslim Okkootta, has strongly condemned the government's move and vowed to launch a battle against the decision to privatize the hospital. In a meeting held on Friday, the Okkoota has formed a 10 member struggle committee in this regard.

Reporters were briefed that in its meeting on August 24, the state Cabinet decided that three parcels of land belonging to the Health and Family Welfare department in Udupi be handed over to B R Shetty owned company BRS Ventures to develop a hospital.

However, the Cabinet note tells a different story. The note states that Shetty had come forward to build a pediatric and maternity hospital, a 400-bed super-speciality hospital and a community health centre. Mr Shetty's company had sought 15 months to complete the pediatric and maternity hospital and 24 months to finish the community health centre.

The note stated that the company would collect “minimum” charges for using facilities at the super-speciality hospital. Laboratory fees, doctor fees will be charged separately.

Comments

suresh
 - 
Saturday, 3 Sep 2016

Dear Panna what deal you are talking. If he want to build hospital, let him purchase any land and build hospital who cares. Why he need govt land for free? That also some one donated. He wants every thing free and then portray that he is giving service. Every one knows him. They will not give anything free.He is business minded. This is like denail of service to poor. Poor people are happy with current facility. No need to build super speciality if govt can not. Or let govt ask donation from people. Many are there who can donate. This looks some one have hand in glove.

M2
 - 
Saturday, 3 Sep 2016

Every election, people elect corrupt criminals to run the government, and then complain against every decision they take. WHY? Democracy!

Ammi
 - 
Saturday, 3 Sep 2016

Businessman openly endorsed that he belongs to Hindu Maha Sabha and big fan of Modi. Now he needs Abdullah Haji's land for his business. He is the patron of sangh parivar in GCC.
Govt. must rethink before handover land to Modi Bhakts.

Narvind Modriwal
 - 
Saturday, 3 Sep 2016

Privatisation is a menace. Funny thing is that BJP leaders are supporting Haji sab and opposing Shetty sab. hahaha. what a politics!

muthhu
 - 
Saturday, 3 Sep 2016

we have to put ourselves in the place of Abdullah or his relatives . why he donated the land ? still now i can see poor people benefiting for .

Rikaz
 - 
Saturday, 3 Sep 2016

If it was given freely by someone Shetty don't have any right to make money out of it....otherwise make sure that Shetty provides free services to poors even if he builds high tech hospital up there.

Mahesh
 - 
Saturday, 3 Sep 2016

Arshad your region rich also can purchase land and build free medical hospital right, everyone everywhere must be united and with unity we have to work for the society development.

A.Mangalore
 - 
Saturday, 3 Sep 2016

it is really good news that mr. shetty is intend to build a hospital. why not ?? there are thousands of vacate land he can buy and build his hospital?
let him allow poor people to get free medical service under government hospital.
udupi waalo -- jaago - gareebonke liye lado.

Parvez
 - 
Saturday, 3 Sep 2016

@ manohar & chatrapathi
Why we (common people) need government when they can't run a district hospital. This decision of government will not benefit the lower class. Today health care tomorrow security ....

Chathrapathi
 - 
Saturday, 3 Sep 2016

this concerned people or groups dont have any other work about concern, even udupi is developing this people will be concern,

Manohar Panna
 - 
Saturday, 3 Sep 2016

(any group)u dont need to concern about it. if BR shetty is taking the deal, it will showcase the development of udupi.

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 3,2026

Bengaluru: Following reports of fresh Nipah virus (NiV) cases in West Bengal and heightened vigilance across parts of Southeast Asia, the Karnataka Health Department has placed the state on high alert and activated emergency preparedness protocols.

Health officials said enhanced surveillance measures have been initiated after two healthcare workers in Barasat, West Bengal, tested positive for the virus earlier this month. While no cases have been reported in Karnataka so far, authorities said the state’s past exposure to Nipah outbreaks and high inter-state mobility warranted preventive action.

Officials have directed district health teams to intensify monitoring, particularly at hospitals and points of entry, and to ensure early detection and isolation of suspected cases.

High Mortality Virus with Multiple Transmission Routes

Nipah virus is a zoonotic disease that can spread from animals to humans and has a reported fatality rate ranging between 60 and 75 per cent. Fruit bats, also known as flying foxes, are the natural reservoirs of the virus and can transmit it by contaminating food sources with saliva or urine.

Known modes of transmission include:

•    Contaminated food: Consumption of fruits partially eaten by bats or raw date-palm sap
•    Animal contact: Exposure to infected pigs or other animals
•    Human-to-human transmission: Close contact with body fluids of infected persons, particularly in healthcare settings

Symptoms and Disease Progression

The incubation period typically ranges from 4 to 14 days, though delayed onset has also been reported. Early symptoms often resemble common viral infections, making prompt clinical suspicion critical.

•    Initial symptoms: Fever, headache, body aches, fatigue, sore throat
•    Progressive symptoms: Drowsiness, disorientation, altered mental state
•    Severe stage: Seizures, neck stiffness and acute encephalitis, which can rapidly progress to coma

Public Health Advisory

The Health Department has issued precautionary guidelines urging the public to adopt risk-avoidance practices to prevent any local spillover.

Do’s
•    Wash fruits thoroughly before consumption
•    Drink boiled and cooled water
•    Use protective equipment while handling livestock
•    Maintain strict hand hygiene

Don’ts
•    Avoid fruits found on the ground or showing bite marks
•    Do not consume beverages made from raw tree sap, including toddy
•    Avoid areas with dense bat populations
•    Do not handle sick or dead animals

Preparedness Measures

Officials confirmed that isolation wards are being readied in major government hospitals and that medical staff are being sensitised to identify early warning signs.

“There is no cause for panic, but there is a need for heightened vigilance,” a senior health official said, adding that there is currently no approved vaccine or specific antiviral treatment for Nipah, and care remains largely supportive.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 31,2026

Roy.jpg

Bengaluru: The shooting incident involving CJ Roy, founder of the Confident Group, has once again put the spotlight on a businessman whose life has swung between flamboyant global success and persistent controversy at home.

Though Roy’s business interests extended across continents, his roots lay firmly in Karnataka. An alumnus of Christ School in Bengaluru, he later moved to Tumakuru to pursue an engineering degree. Those familiar with his early years describe him as intensely ambitious, beginning his career as a salesman at a small electronics firm dealing in computers.

Roy’s entry into large-scale real estate came through the Crystal Group, where he worked closely with Latha Namboothiri and rose from manager to director. However, the launch of the Confident Group in 2005 was clouded by industry speculation. Insiders speak of a fallout involving alleged “benami” properties and claims of deception that ultimately led to his independent venture—an episode Roy spent years trying to distance himself from, according to associates.

A tale of two cities

Roy’s professional trajectory diverged sharply across geographies.

In Dubai, he built a reputation as a bold and efficient developer, completing massive luxury residential projects in record time—some reportedly within 11 months. His rapid project delivery and lavish lifestyle in the Emirates earned him admiration and visibility in the real estate sector.

In Bengaluru, however, his image remained far more fractured. Sources say Roy stayed away from the city for several years amid disputes over unpaid dues to vendors and suppliers. Several projects were allegedly stalled, with accusations of unfulfilled commitments to cement and steel suppliers continuing to follow him.

Roy’s return to Bengaluru’s business and social circles began around 2018, marked by a conscious attempt at rebranding. His appointment as Honorary Consul of the Slovak Republic added diplomatic legitimacy, which he complemented with visible CSR initiatives, including ambulance donations and high-profile charity events.

Heavy police presence in Langford Town

Following the incident, police personnel from the Central division were deployed outside the Confident Group building in Langford Town, which also houses the Slovak Honorary Consulate in Bengaluru.

The otherwise busy premises near Hosur Road wore a deserted look on Friday, reflecting the shock and uncertainty that followed the tragedy.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 1,2026

Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash an investigation against a WhatsApp group administrator accused of allowing the circulation of obscene and offensive images depicting Hindutva politicians and idols in 2021.

Justice M Nagaprasanna observed that, prima facie, the ingredients of the offence under Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code were made out. “The offence under Section 295A of the IPC is met to every word of its ingredient, albeit prima facie,” the judge said.

The petitioner, Sirajuddin, a resident of Belthangady taluk in Dakshina Kannada district, had challenged the FIR registered against him at the CEN (Cyber, Economics and Narcotics) police station, Mangaluru, for offences under Section 295A of the IPC and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act. Section 295A relates to punishment for deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage the religious feelings of any class of citizens.

According to the complaint filed by K Jayaraj Salian, also a resident of Belthangady taluk, he received a WhatsApp group link from an unknown source and was added to the group after accessing it. The group reportedly had six administrators and around 250 participants, where obscene and offensive images depicting Hindu deities and certain political figures were allegedly circulated repeatedly.

Sirajuddin was arrested in connection with the case and later released on bail on February 16, 2021. He argued before the court that he was being selectively targeted, while other administrators—including the creator of the group—were neither arrested nor investigated. He also contended that the Magistrate could not have taken cognisance of the offence under Section 295A without prior sanction under Section 196(1) of the CrPC.

Rejecting the argument, Justice Nagaprasanna held that prior sanction is required only at the stage of taking cognisance, and not at the stage of registration of the crime or during investigation.

The judge noted that the State had produced the entire investigation material before the court. “A perusal of the material reveals depictions of Hindu deities in an extraordinarily obscene, demeaning and profane manner. The content is such that its reproduction in a judicial order would itself be inappropriate,” the court said, adding that the material, on its face, had the tendency to outrage religious feelings and disturb communal harmony.

Observing that the case was still at the investigation stage, the court said it could not interdict the probe at this juncture. However, it expressed concern that the investigating officer appeared to have not proceeded uniformly against all administrators. The court clarified that if the investigation revealed the active involvement of any member in permitting the circulation of such content, they must also be proceeded against.

“At this investigative stage, any further observation by this Court would be unnecessary,” the order concluded.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.