Jain College's action is violation of Indian Constitution, says NAC member

[email protected] (CD Network)
August 16, 2011

hadiya

Mangalore, August 16: In an apparent embarrassment to Moodbidri based Jain Pre University College, which has denied permission to a Muslim girl to cover her head with the dupatta of her uniform, a prominent member of National Advisory Council (NAC), has termed the college management's move as “violation of constitutional rights”.

“This is violation of the constitutional right as well as the right to education” said Harsh Mander, who is also a special commissioner to the Supreme Court of India.

Mr Mander's statement comes after Hadiya Iqbal, a second year commerce student of the PU College sought the intervention of NAC to ensue her fundamental rights assured in the Indian Constitution.

The 17 year old girl has requested Mr Mander through an email to “take cognisance” of the matter, which she termed violation of her fundamental right.

Confirming that he had received the email, Mr Mander said that he was quite disturbed by its content.

He said that Indian Secularism is not separation of religion and culture as it is in France.

Mr Mander also said that he would write to the National Commission for Minorities in his individual capacity and not as a member of NAC, as “individual grievances were not NAC's mandate”.

It can be mentioned that Hadiya had approached Deputy Commissioner of N S Channappa Gowda last week seeking justice.


Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 23,2026

Karnataka Governor Thaawarchand Gehlot read only three lines from the 122-paragraph address prepared by the Congress-led state government while addressing the joint session of the Legislature on Thursday, effectively bypassing large sections critical of the BJP-led Union government.

The omitted portions of the customary Governor’s address outlined what the state government described as a “suppressive situation in economic and policy matters” under India’s federal framework. The speech also sharply criticised the Centre’s move to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) with the Viksit Bharat–Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Act, commonly referred to as the VB-GRAM (G) Act.

Governor Gehlot had earlier conveyed his objection to several paragraphs that were explicitly critical of the Union government. On Thursday, he confined himself to the opening lines — “I extend a warm welcome to all of you to the joint session of the State legislature. I am extremely pleased to address this august House” — before jumping directly to the concluding sentence of the final paragraph.

He ended the address by reading the last line of paragraph 122: “Overall, my government is firmly committed to doubling the pace of the State’s economic, social and physical development. Jai Hind — Jai Karnataka.”

According to the prepared speech, the Karnataka government demanded the scrapping of the VB-GRAM (G) Act, describing it as “contractor-centric” and detrimental to rural livelihoods, and called for the full restoration of MGNREGA. The state government argued that the new law undermines decentralisation, weakens labour protections, and centralises decision-making in violation of constitutional norms.

Key points from the unread sections of the speech:

•    Karnataka facing a “suppressive” economic and policy environment within the federal system

•    Repeal of MGNREGA described as a blow to rural livelihoods

•    VB-GRAM (G) Act accused of protecting corporate and contractor interests

•    New law alleged to weaken decentralised governance

•    Decision-making said to be imposed by the Centre without consulting states

•    Rights of Adivasis, women, backward classes and agrarian communities curtailed

•    Labourers allegedly placed under contractor control

•    States facing mounting fiscal stress due to central policies

•    VB-GRAM (G) Act accused of enabling large-scale corruption

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.