Petitioner pained at reversal of Mangalore crash payout verdict

August 27, 2011

Kasaragod, August 27: Abdul Salam, one of the family members of the Mangalore air crash victims, on whose petition the single judge bench of the Kerala High Court had directed the awarding of Rs. 75 lakh compensation, has described as “a matter of great concern” the division bench's move of striking down the earlier order.

Abdul Salam, whose son Mohammed Rafi died in the crash, one of the worst air disasters the country witnessed in recent years, said he felt deeply hurt when the Air India decided to file a writ against the verdict of the single judge.

“The approach of the Air India with regard to the kin of the victims is improper. AI counsel Nanavati had sought the details and documents of my slain son. However, all the documents had been lost in the air disaster. However, we had provided them some documents after securing them from his employers in the Gulf. But every time we visited the AI lawyers, we had to listen to some negative talk,” he said.

Meanwhile, pall of gloom descended across the district after High Court set aside a single judge's order directing Air India to pay a minimum compensation of Rs.75 lakh each to the dependant families of 158 air passengers who lost their lives in the Mangalore air crash on May 22, 2010.

“The High Court verdict was very painful and shocking, and we are determined to approach the Supreme Court,” N.A. Sulaiman, coordinator of the Mangalore Air Crash Victims Family Association, said.

He said the association was forced to take legal recourse only after the authorities began to discriminate between the victims' families on the issue of disbursing deserving compensation as per the Montreal Convention, to which India was a signatory.

As many as 100 victims hailed from economically weaker sections, and the Centre should urgently intervene to settle the issue amicably on humanitarian grounds, Mr. Sulaiman said.

As many as 58 victims hailed from Kasaragod and Kannur districts of Kerala, Mr. Sulaiman said.

Plea to Ravi

Civil Aviation Minister Vayalar Ravi owed an explanation to the people of the State on why Air India took initiative in dragging the settlement of compensation to the victims' close family.


mangalore-air-crash-victims_1
Petitioner Abdul Salam (extreme right), his son Abdul Nasir with a
photo of Mohammad Rafi, who was killed in Mangalore air crash

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 23,2026

Karnataka Governor Thaawarchand Gehlot read only three lines from the 122-paragraph address prepared by the Congress-led state government while addressing the joint session of the Legislature on Thursday, effectively bypassing large sections critical of the BJP-led Union government.

The omitted portions of the customary Governor’s address outlined what the state government described as a “suppressive situation in economic and policy matters” under India’s federal framework. The speech also sharply criticised the Centre’s move to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) with the Viksit Bharat–Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Act, commonly referred to as the VB-GRAM (G) Act.

Governor Gehlot had earlier conveyed his objection to several paragraphs that were explicitly critical of the Union government. On Thursday, he confined himself to the opening lines — “I extend a warm welcome to all of you to the joint session of the State legislature. I am extremely pleased to address this august House” — before jumping directly to the concluding sentence of the final paragraph.

He ended the address by reading the last line of paragraph 122: “Overall, my government is firmly committed to doubling the pace of the State’s economic, social and physical development. Jai Hind — Jai Karnataka.”

According to the prepared speech, the Karnataka government demanded the scrapping of the VB-GRAM (G) Act, describing it as “contractor-centric” and detrimental to rural livelihoods, and called for the full restoration of MGNREGA. The state government argued that the new law undermines decentralisation, weakens labour protections, and centralises decision-making in violation of constitutional norms.

Key points from the unread sections of the speech:

•    Karnataka facing a “suppressive” economic and policy environment within the federal system

•    Repeal of MGNREGA described as a blow to rural livelihoods

•    VB-GRAM (G) Act accused of protecting corporate and contractor interests

•    New law alleged to weaken decentralised governance

•    Decision-making said to be imposed by the Centre without consulting states

•    Rights of Adivasis, women, backward classes and agrarian communities curtailed

•    Labourers allegedly placed under contractor control

•    States facing mounting fiscal stress due to central policies

•    VB-GRAM (G) Act accused of enabling large-scale corruption

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.