Bruised and battered, this 'handicapped' man battles for justice in Belthangady

[email protected] (CD Network)
September 16, 2011
Belthangady, September 16: It is back to square one for Mohammed Soofi, an odd-jobs man from Aladangady near Kakkinje in Belthngady taluk. The 24-year-old had met with an electric accident a couple of years ago and was left with a partial disability on the left-half of his body. He lost all his toes on his left foot and one on his right and one finger in his left hand has also got affected. He cannot lift anything with the left hand despite undergoing a plastic surgery.

The accident left him with few options for livelihood, but the resilience of the man saw him battle the odds and eke out a living by working as conductor in oil carrying tankers of a distributer in Mangalore. But, even as he was toiling hard in the hope of ensuring a better tomorrow, another tragedy has befallen Soofi leaving him in the lurch once again.

Ironically, the society which should have been sympathetic towards the man with partial disability struggling to stand on his own has been apathetic to his plight. The illiterate youngster was brutally assaulted by a powerful local thug last Friday without any provocation and got bruises and wounds on the already incapacitated limbs. He received injuries on the head, his unresponsive finger on the left hand was bruised and the portion on the forehand which had been transplanted during plastic surgery came off. He was left in the hospital bed for eight days and hardly anyone from the local community came to his help. The fighter in the young man prodded him to approach the police for justice. After dragging their feet for few days, the police registered a case under non-cognizable sections, which is generally meant for white-collar crimes.

soofi1

Background

Last Friday Soofi had accompanied a few volunteers of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind for lunch at Rahiman Hotel in Kakkinje. The Jamaat delegation was apparently on a mission to find out destitute families in the rural areas of Belthangady and stumbled upon Soofi, through one of his relative. In fact, Soofi had been one of the beneficiaries of Jamaat's charity activities. They had helped him foot a bill amounting to over Rs. 25,000 a couple of years ago at Yenepoya Hospital in Deralakatte. Following the plastic surgery on his left arm, he was able to carry out his daily life and was in fact earning his livelihood working as a conductor cum driver on oil tankers. “I have been regularly going on trips to distant places as Bellary and Chikmagalur. The earnings used to keep our family afloat,” says Soofi, who has three young children and a wife to look after.

Overcome by a sense of gratitude, Soofi had also gone to a meeting of the Jamaat in Aladangadi, where he saw a brochure brought out by the organisation. The brochure had his picture (of him receiving the relief money given at the hospital) and he was so excited that he carried one with him on returning to Kakkinje. He went to Rahman Hotel in the evening for tea and when the owner Salim asked him about the guests who visited for lunch, he happily showed the brochure and said that the people are involved in charity work. He also pointed to his picture printed on the brochure.

Raheem, who runs a small canteen near petrol pump, overheard the conversation and intervened saying “these organisations are doing all this for money.” This angered Soofi, who replied to him saying he was helped by the members of this organisation, when none from the local community had come forward to his help after he suffered electric shock. The reply apparently upset Raheem, who dealt severe blow on his face and banged his head against the wall besides kicking him to the ground. The members of the public watched silently the entire episode and left the hapless victim to take the fight for justice on his own. He went straight to the Government Hospital in Belthangady and complained that he had been assaulted by a man. The doctors subsequently informed the police about the incident. The police came and took a statement from Soofi.

soofi2

But no progress was made for the next three days, neither an FIR was registered until Wednesday. When the issue was brought to the notice of the jurisdictional sub-inspector Yogish, he apparently took the subordinates into task. “He came here on Wednesday and blasted the ASI and other police personnel for not taking any action on my complaint. He also slammed them for not showing any humanitarian considerations for the handicapped man,” says Soofi.

When asked about the delay in filing the FIR Mr. Yogish said that it was a non-cognizable offence and the sanction of the court was required to file an FIR and take action against the suspected attacker.

“We have now booked a NC case. The delay was due to the non-availability of the local judge. We had to get the sanction from the court in Moodbidri. We have acted upon the complaint and the accused has already been arrested,” he told Coastaldigest.com.

When asked about minor clauses of IPC being slapped against the accused, he said, the injuries were not very serious. “He was a semi-handicapped man. He might have fallen to the ground just after a push. The injury on his head could have been caused by a nail,” he says.

When asked for his reaction on the episode, Labhu Ram, the Superintendent of Police, said, he would look into the matter thoroughly. “I will find out why a NC case has been registered. I will also find out if there has been any delay in the inquiry,” he said. “If the matter is really serious, the concerned person can directly contact me and I will definitely hear him out,” Mr Ram said.

Whether or not the police department considers it a cognizable offence, the victim, Soofi, definitely has been rendered jobless, as he cannot take up any tough job for the next couple of months. “The irony of the whole issue is a man who has constantly been striving to lead a life with self-respect and dignity without taking recourse to begging, has got a raw deal from the so called civilized society,” says Amin Ahsan, the vice-president of Jamaat-e-Islami Hindi, Dakshina Kannada Unit.

But, undeterred by the new challenge, Soofi is now dreaming of securing a four-wheeler license and becoming a full-time driver. “I will use the two-month recovery period to find out if I can get a driving license. Being an illiterate, I am not sure, if I am eligible to get one. I am very confident of passing the test. But I cannot do anything if the law is stacked against an underprivileged, impoverished, handicapped and illiterate person like me,” he concludes.


Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 31,2026

Roy.jpg

Bengaluru: The shooting incident involving CJ Roy, founder of the Confident Group, has once again put the spotlight on a businessman whose life has swung between flamboyant global success and persistent controversy at home.

Though Roy’s business interests extended across continents, his roots lay firmly in Karnataka. An alumnus of Christ School in Bengaluru, he later moved to Tumakuru to pursue an engineering degree. Those familiar with his early years describe him as intensely ambitious, beginning his career as a salesman at a small electronics firm dealing in computers.

Roy’s entry into large-scale real estate came through the Crystal Group, where he worked closely with Latha Namboothiri and rose from manager to director. However, the launch of the Confident Group in 2005 was clouded by industry speculation. Insiders speak of a fallout involving alleged “benami” properties and claims of deception that ultimately led to his independent venture—an episode Roy spent years trying to distance himself from, according to associates.

A tale of two cities

Roy’s professional trajectory diverged sharply across geographies.

In Dubai, he built a reputation as a bold and efficient developer, completing massive luxury residential projects in record time—some reportedly within 11 months. His rapid project delivery and lavish lifestyle in the Emirates earned him admiration and visibility in the real estate sector.

In Bengaluru, however, his image remained far more fractured. Sources say Roy stayed away from the city for several years amid disputes over unpaid dues to vendors and suppliers. Several projects were allegedly stalled, with accusations of unfulfilled commitments to cement and steel suppliers continuing to follow him.

Roy’s return to Bengaluru’s business and social circles began around 2018, marked by a conscious attempt at rebranding. His appointment as Honorary Consul of the Slovak Republic added diplomatic legitimacy, which he complemented with visible CSR initiatives, including ambulance donations and high-profile charity events.

Heavy police presence in Langford Town

Following the incident, police personnel from the Central division were deployed outside the Confident Group building in Langford Town, which also houses the Slovak Honorary Consulate in Bengaluru.

The otherwise busy premises near Hosur Road wore a deserted look on Friday, reflecting the shock and uncertainty that followed the tragedy.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 1,2026

Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash an investigation against a WhatsApp group administrator accused of allowing the circulation of obscene and offensive images depicting Hindutva politicians and idols in 2021.

Justice M Nagaprasanna observed that, prima facie, the ingredients of the offence under Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code were made out. “The offence under Section 295A of the IPC is met to every word of its ingredient, albeit prima facie,” the judge said.

The petitioner, Sirajuddin, a resident of Belthangady taluk in Dakshina Kannada district, had challenged the FIR registered against him at the CEN (Cyber, Economics and Narcotics) police station, Mangaluru, for offences under Section 295A of the IPC and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act. Section 295A relates to punishment for deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage the religious feelings of any class of citizens.

According to the complaint filed by K Jayaraj Salian, also a resident of Belthangady taluk, he received a WhatsApp group link from an unknown source and was added to the group after accessing it. The group reportedly had six administrators and around 250 participants, where obscene and offensive images depicting Hindu deities and certain political figures were allegedly circulated repeatedly.

Sirajuddin was arrested in connection with the case and later released on bail on February 16, 2021. He argued before the court that he was being selectively targeted, while other administrators—including the creator of the group—were neither arrested nor investigated. He also contended that the Magistrate could not have taken cognisance of the offence under Section 295A without prior sanction under Section 196(1) of the CrPC.

Rejecting the argument, Justice Nagaprasanna held that prior sanction is required only at the stage of taking cognisance, and not at the stage of registration of the crime or during investigation.

The judge noted that the State had produced the entire investigation material before the court. “A perusal of the material reveals depictions of Hindu deities in an extraordinarily obscene, demeaning and profane manner. The content is such that its reproduction in a judicial order would itself be inappropriate,” the court said, adding that the material, on its face, had the tendency to outrage religious feelings and disturb communal harmony.

Observing that the case was still at the investigation stage, the court said it could not interdict the probe at this juncture. However, it expressed concern that the investigating officer appeared to have not proceeded uniformly against all administrators. The court clarified that if the investigation revealed the active involvement of any member in permitting the circulation of such content, they must also be proceeded against.

“At this investigative stage, any further observation by this Court would be unnecessary,” the order concluded.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 1,2026

Bengaluru: Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar on Sunday criticised the Union Budget presented by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, claiming it offered no tangible benefit to the state.

Though he said he was yet to study the budget in detail, Shivakumar asserted that Karnataka had gained little from it. “There is no benefit for our state from the central budget. I was observing it. They have now named a programme after Mahatma Gandhi, after repealing the MGNREGA Act that was named after him,” he said.

Speaking to reporters here, the Deputy Chief Minister demanded the restoration of MGNREGA, and made it clear that the newly enacted rural employment scheme — VB-G RAM G — which proposes a 60:40 fund-sharing formula between the Centre and the states, would not be implemented in Karnataka.

“I don’t see any major share for our state in this budget,” he added.

Shivakumar, who also holds charge of Bengaluru development, said there were high expectations for the city from the Union Budget. “The Prime Minister calls Bengaluru a ‘global city’, but what has the Centre done for it?” he asked.

He also drew attention to the problems faced by sugar factories, particularly those in the cooperative sector, alleging a lack of timely decisions and support from the central government.

Noting that the Centre has the authority to fix the minimum support price (MSP) for agricultural produce, Shivakumar said the Union government must take concrete steps to protect farmers’ interests.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.