Tagore challenges all even today: Ananthmurthy

September 30, 2011

murthi

Manipal, September 30: Rabindranath Tagore is relevant even today to all writers as the writers do struggle with the ideas of ''satta'' (reality) and ''eccha'' (desire) in the process of writing,'' opined renowned litterateur and Jnanapeetha awardee Dr U R Ananthmurthy.

Delivering the keynote address on the occasion of Rabindra Utsav organised by Manipal Institute of Communication in association with Ministry of Culture, Government of India, to mark the 150th birth anniversary of Rabindranath Tagore here on Thursday, Ananthmurthy said Tagore is someone who challenges all even today.

Tagore intervenes with Gandhi and he was highly influenced by the Spanish poet Neruda. Tagore was a patriotic and not a nationalist. Tagore was suspicious of nationalism. He envisaged the model of India as the site of civilisation rather than viewing it as country.

Unlike Gandhi, he was not a revivalist, rather Tagore was revisionist. Whereas Gandhi was revivalist. Tagore was more consciously modernised than Gandhi. Gandhi and Tagore are still in struggle against each other and they need to be studied together.

Ananthmurthy said Gora, the volume authored by Tagore is a fundamental text for all Indians in understanding equality, he added.

He said hunger for equality, hunger for modernity and hunger of new spirituality that goes beyond the conventional religion was the three great hungers of 20th century that charged the history of times. These three hungers were charged by intelligentsia and also the common masses. All the three hungers have roots in equality and self respect.

Hunger is a kind of urge in people that is both subjective and also historically objective.

During the times of Tagore, writers in western countries with deepest desires had political reservations not shared by the common masses unlike in India where it was shared by the common masses. Tagore influenced various other Indian languages through inspired translators. Great writers begin with emptiness as happened with Tagore.

Driving oneself to that point of nothing to say will bring out something. It applies to all fields like music, writing, mathematics and so on. Writing in English language had one advantage where the writer need not had to mention the area, caste or religion to which he belongs, he added.

Stating that Karnataka had major impact of Bengal rather than the neighbouring states, Ananthmurthy said it was the British rule and Hindu renaissance that made differences in Bengal.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 1,2026

Bengaluru: Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar on Sunday criticised the Union Budget presented by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, claiming it offered no tangible benefit to the state.

Though he said he was yet to study the budget in detail, Shivakumar asserted that Karnataka had gained little from it. “There is no benefit for our state from the central budget. I was observing it. They have now named a programme after Mahatma Gandhi, after repealing the MGNREGA Act that was named after him,” he said.

Speaking to reporters here, the Deputy Chief Minister demanded the restoration of MGNREGA, and made it clear that the newly enacted rural employment scheme — VB-G RAM G — which proposes a 60:40 fund-sharing formula between the Centre and the states, would not be implemented in Karnataka.

“I don’t see any major share for our state in this budget,” he added.

Shivakumar, who also holds charge of Bengaluru development, said there were high expectations for the city from the Union Budget. “The Prime Minister calls Bengaluru a ‘global city’, but what has the Centre done for it?” he asked.

He also drew attention to the problems faced by sugar factories, particularly those in the cooperative sector, alleging a lack of timely decisions and support from the central government.

Noting that the Centre has the authority to fix the minimum support price (MSP) for agricultural produce, Shivakumar said the Union government must take concrete steps to protect farmers’ interests.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.