15 'bonded labourers' rescued

[email protected] (CD Network)
October 17, 2011
Mangalore, October 17: As many as 15 helpless construction workers including a woman hailing from remote villages of West Bengal, who were forced to work as bonded labourers for over one and a half month under a contract company affiliated to Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited at Porkodi near Bajpe on the outskirts of the city, were rescued in an early morning operation on Monday.

Acting on a credible information provided by Paschim Banga Khet Majoor Samiti, a trade union of agricultural workers from West Bengal, a team of officials led by Mangalore Tahsildar Ravichandra Naik and State assistant labour commissioner Venkatesh Sindihatti along with police personnel raided workers huts around 6:45 am, to witness a tragic scene.

Incapacitated by the widespread hunger, in Purulia and Bankura districts of West Bengal, the workers had been forced to migrate to Karnataka in search of work.

In the last week of August, Dibesh Das, a contractor in Purulia district had recruited a total of 15 workers from Layekdi and Lakhanpur villages in Purulia district and Katharia village in Bankura district.

However, Dibesh Das handed the workers over to Bholanath Singh, a labour contractor from Burdwan district, who in turn had sent them through his employee Sanjay Singh to work in Mangalore. The workers were engaged for construction work.

As contractor promised Rs 4,000 monthly wages apart from food, shelter and other necessary facilities for eight-hour work a day, the helpless 14 men and a woman thought they could return to their homes with a heavy purse after a few months of toil.

However after reaching their new work place, they were literally treated as bonded labourers and their family members too could not contact them for a long time.

It is said that when the family members asked the contractor for the whereabouts of the workers, they were instead threatened.

“Quite against to their promise, we were forced to work 14 - 16 hours a day with hardly any payment of wages so far. Since past one and a half month, we were taken out from our huts at 7 am in the morning for work and were only allowed back at 9 pm”, said Muchiram Kaibartha, one of the workers.

“When I protested against the ill treatment a few days ago, the contractor thrashed me”, he said showing the wound on his leg.

“We were not allowed to go out of the workplace as the contractor always kept an eye on us. And whenever we raised our problems before the employers they respond with physical violence and abusive language” said Biplav Gode, another labourer.

“When we pleaded the contractor for monthly wages, he replied that he had bought us all for Rs 4 lakh from another contractor, who is now absconding”, he said, adding that so far the workers were able to get a payment of Rs 70 for a week.

Bhim Goswamy, another worker alleged that the musclemen beat the workers, when they put up a protest against the continuous exploitation. “We just want to go out of this hell. We had come here with a dream earning. But, we became bonded labourers. My wife Urmila has fallen sick, but, I don't have money to take her to the doctor”, he lamented.

He said that the employers had failed to provide minimum treatment for Urmila, the only woman among the 15 workers, who has been suffering stomach pain and neck pain since several days.

“I cannot see things after 5 pm due to vision problem. However, I was forced to take cement mix to the upper floors by steps till night” complained an ailing Sanjay Kaibarta.

Not bonded labourers!

Speaking to media persons Tahsildar Ravichandra Naik said, although it was confirmed that 15 labourers were forced to work for no wages by one Sanjay Singh, they cannot be called as bonded labourers.

“There was no sign of human rights violation. Even during the medical examination, doctors could not found any mark of physical torture on the labourers”, he said.

However, Mr Sindihatti admitted that the 'violation of labour law' was apparent in this case. “If they want to return home after securing the pending wages, we will make proper arrangements for their travel” he said.

KEN0

KEN1

KEN2

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 23,2026

Karnataka Governor Thaawarchand Gehlot read only three lines from the 122-paragraph address prepared by the Congress-led state government while addressing the joint session of the Legislature on Thursday, effectively bypassing large sections critical of the BJP-led Union government.

The omitted portions of the customary Governor’s address outlined what the state government described as a “suppressive situation in economic and policy matters” under India’s federal framework. The speech also sharply criticised the Centre’s move to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) with the Viksit Bharat–Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Act, commonly referred to as the VB-GRAM (G) Act.

Governor Gehlot had earlier conveyed his objection to several paragraphs that were explicitly critical of the Union government. On Thursday, he confined himself to the opening lines — “I extend a warm welcome to all of you to the joint session of the State legislature. I am extremely pleased to address this august House” — before jumping directly to the concluding sentence of the final paragraph.

He ended the address by reading the last line of paragraph 122: “Overall, my government is firmly committed to doubling the pace of the State’s economic, social and physical development. Jai Hind — Jai Karnataka.”

According to the prepared speech, the Karnataka government demanded the scrapping of the VB-GRAM (G) Act, describing it as “contractor-centric” and detrimental to rural livelihoods, and called for the full restoration of MGNREGA. The state government argued that the new law undermines decentralisation, weakens labour protections, and centralises decision-making in violation of constitutional norms.

Key points from the unread sections of the speech:

•    Karnataka facing a “suppressive” economic and policy environment within the federal system

•    Repeal of MGNREGA described as a blow to rural livelihoods

•    VB-GRAM (G) Act accused of protecting corporate and contractor interests

•    New law alleged to weaken decentralised governance

•    Decision-making said to be imposed by the Centre without consulting states

•    Rights of Adivasis, women, backward classes and agrarian communities curtailed

•    Labourers allegedly placed under contractor control

•    States facing mounting fiscal stress due to central policies

•    VB-GRAM (G) Act accused of enabling large-scale corruption

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 1,2026

Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash an investigation against a WhatsApp group administrator accused of allowing the circulation of obscene and offensive images depicting Hindutva politicians and idols in 2021.

Justice M Nagaprasanna observed that, prima facie, the ingredients of the offence under Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code were made out. “The offence under Section 295A of the IPC is met to every word of its ingredient, albeit prima facie,” the judge said.

The petitioner, Sirajuddin, a resident of Belthangady taluk in Dakshina Kannada district, had challenged the FIR registered against him at the CEN (Cyber, Economics and Narcotics) police station, Mangaluru, for offences under Section 295A of the IPC and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act. Section 295A relates to punishment for deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage the religious feelings of any class of citizens.

According to the complaint filed by K Jayaraj Salian, also a resident of Belthangady taluk, he received a WhatsApp group link from an unknown source and was added to the group after accessing it. The group reportedly had six administrators and around 250 participants, where obscene and offensive images depicting Hindu deities and certain political figures were allegedly circulated repeatedly.

Sirajuddin was arrested in connection with the case and later released on bail on February 16, 2021. He argued before the court that he was being selectively targeted, while other administrators—including the creator of the group—were neither arrested nor investigated. He also contended that the Magistrate could not have taken cognisance of the offence under Section 295A without prior sanction under Section 196(1) of the CrPC.

Rejecting the argument, Justice Nagaprasanna held that prior sanction is required only at the stage of taking cognisance, and not at the stage of registration of the crime or during investigation.

The judge noted that the State had produced the entire investigation material before the court. “A perusal of the material reveals depictions of Hindu deities in an extraordinarily obscene, demeaning and profane manner. The content is such that its reproduction in a judicial order would itself be inappropriate,” the court said, adding that the material, on its face, had the tendency to outrage religious feelings and disturb communal harmony.

Observing that the case was still at the investigation stage, the court said it could not interdict the probe at this juncture. However, it expressed concern that the investigating officer appeared to have not proceeded uniformly against all administrators. The court clarified that if the investigation revealed the active involvement of any member in permitting the circulation of such content, they must also be proceeded against.

“At this investigative stage, any further observation by this Court would be unnecessary,” the order concluded.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 1,2026

Golf.jpg

The coastal city of Mangaluru is gearing up for a major sporting milestone with the launch of a Golf Excellence Academy at the Pilikula Golf Club (PGC), scheduled to open on May 31. The initiative aims to position Mangaluru firmly on India’s national golfing map.

Speaking to reporters on Saturday during PGC’s first-ever floodlit Pro-Am tournament, club captain Manoj Kumar Shetty said the project is being funded by UAE-based philanthropist Michael D’Souza and is currently in the design phase. Experts from leading golf academies across the country are expected to visit Mangaluru to help shape the training programme and infrastructure.

The academy will train 20 young golfers at a time, with a long-term vision of producing national-level players from the region. Until now, PGC relied on an in-house coach, but the recent renovation of the course and the introduction of floodlights have opened new possibilities for expanding the sport.

Shetty said discussions are underway with two reputed coaching academies, whose heads are expected to visit PGC shortly. “A dormitory for trainers is already under construction. We are inviting academies to assess the facilities and suggest changes so we can build a truly world-class Golf Excellence Academy,” he said.

Professional golfer Aryan Roopa Anand noted that the floodlit course would be a game-changer for young players. “Students can now practise after school hours, even up to 8 or 9 pm, without compromising on academics,” he said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.