Mohan bought 10 bottles from same shop between May-June 2009'

November 25, 2011

mohan_copy_copy

Mangalore, November 25: The trial of Mohan Kumar, who has been facing charges of killing 20 women after administering them cyanide, continued on fourth day, Thursday with as many as six witnesses giving their statement at the Fast Track court.

On Thursday, the issues related to the recovery of a dead body in a public toilet in Hassan bus stand, Mohan staying in one of the lodges in Madikeri using false name and pledging of gold with one of the financers in Thokottu were taken up for hearing.

While five witnesses gave their statement till the lunch break, one witness gave the statement in the afternoon.

Mohan who is doubling as his own advocate quizzed three witnesses but left the other three go without any counter questions.

Before the hearing could start, Mohan submitted a letter to the Judge which read that the gold chain which was pledged by him with one of the financers did not belong to Anitha, one of his victims, but instead belongs to his wife.

Responding to this, the Judge said that Anitha's brother had identified the chain on the first day of the hearing.

“If you wanted to submit an objection, you should have done it on the same day,” said the Judge who went on to ask Mohan if he want the prosecution to arrange a lawyer for him.

“If you wish the prosecution will appoint a lawyer at government's expense,” said the Judge.

Mohan responding to this, had only nodded his head, without clarifying what his answer was.

First witness

Henry D'Souza, a receptionist at Vinayaka Lodge in Madikeri was the first witness of the day who said that Mohan had come to the lodge on April 13, 2009 along with a lady named Shanthi and stayed in the lodge. Next day both had left the lodge together but Mohan returned to the lodge alone to check out.

D'Souza said that he had registered his name as Sudhakar Acharya in hotel register. The police had come to the hotel four months later, enquiring about the same person, he said.

Cross question

Quizzing D'Souza, Mohan Kumar asked if Shanti was wearing a 'Magalsutra' and if the accused Sudhakar Acharya has introduced her as his wife.

Second witness

Hassan KSTRC Bus stand Security Guard Channaiah giving his statement said that he learnt that a dead body of a lady was found in one of the toilets on June 18, 2009 at 11.30 am. “The body smelled pungent and we suspected that the lady must have consumed poison.”

At this point, Mohan intervened and questioned Channaiah if he had seen the lady coming to the bus stand in the morning.

Judge put an end to this argument started by Mohan by saying that the question is irrelevant as the Guard had come to know about the dead body at 11.30 am.

Third witness

Cyril D'Souza from Kavoor revealed to the Court that Mohan over the last five years has been purchasing tiny bottles from Sai Traders, Central Market, where he is working as a Manager. During May-June, 2009, Mohan had bought 10 such bottles from his shop, said D'Souza.

When Mohan questioned D'Souza as to how he can remember by face hundreds of customers who come to his shop, D'Souza was adamant that Mohan had purchased bottles from him.

Other witnesses

Suresh K, a welder from Bantwal identified the things that were worn by the lady who was found dead at Hassan.

Fifth witness Dinesh Rai, proprietor of Raghavendra Finance Thokottu, said that Mohan had pledged three chains and other gold ornaments in his finance shop on June 20, 2009, and had taken Rs 15,000.

When the ornaments were presented before the Court, Rai identified them.

Suchivratha Shetty was the sixth witness of the day.

Today

On Friday there are possibilities of some doctors giving witness, said Special Prosecutor Cheyyabba Beary.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 26,2025

Mangaluru, Nov 26: Mangaluru East police have registered a case following a sophisticated online fraud where a 57-year-old local resident was allegedly cheated out of ₹13.4 lakh after being targeted on Facebook.

The scam began in February when the complainant, while browsing Facebook reels, was contacted by a woman identifying herself as "Lillian Mary George" from London. After establishing a chat relationship, the woman claimed she would visit India in November and bring a significant sum of money.

The trap was sprung on November 15, when the victim received a call from a woman named "Sonali Gupta," who claimed Lillian had arrived at Mumbai International Airport but was detained by customs. The fraudsters convinced the man that Lillian was carrying £25,000 (about ₹26 lakh) in traveller’s cheques and 1 kg of gold (valued at around ₹30 lakh).

Under the pretense of clearing these items, the victim was asked to make numerous online transfers between November 15 and 18 for various bogus charges, including:

•    "Pounds exchange registration"
•    "Customs declaration issues"
•    "Discount charges"
•    "Money-laundering charges"

Believing the fictitious story, the complainant transferred the cumulative sum of ₹13.4 lakh to various bank accounts provided by the fraudsters. He realised he was cheated when the culprits later promised a refund within two days but stopped answering his calls. The Mangaluru East police are now investigating the case, which highlights the continuing threat of transnational cyber fraud using social engineering and promises of fictitious wealth.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 29,2025

DKSsiddu.jpg

New Delhi: Karnataka chief minister Siddaramaiah and deputy CM DK Shivakumar on Saturday put up a dramatic display of unity at a closely watched joint press briefing, firmly dismissing weeks of speculation about a power-sharing tussle within the Congress. With the high command nudging both leaders to sit together and settle the dust, the meeting became a political spectacle, ending with the duo declaring that there was “no confusion, no differences.”

Calling the reports of a rift “manufactured confusion,” Siddaramaiah said the talks had gone smoothly, even joking about their breakfast. “Breakfast was very good. All three of us enjoyed it,” he said. “We want to end this confusion once and for all. For local elections and for 2028, our mission is clear — Congress must return to power. There is no difference between me and DKS, not now, not before.”

He blamed the media for fuelling rumours and reiterated absolute adherence to the party leadership. “From tomorrow, let there be no confusion. What the high command says, we will follow.”

Siddaramaiah also assured that the Assembly session starting December 8 would run smoothly and vowed that Congress would take on the BJP and JD(S) “together.”

Shivakumar echoed the chief minister word for word, stressing loyalty and discipline. “People have given us a massive mandate. It is our duty to deliver,” he said. “This government was formed under Siddaramaiah’s leadership. We both have complete trust in the high command. If they tell me to wait, I will wait.”

He added that the two leaders had discussed strategy for the 2028 Assembly elections. “Whatever the CM says, I agree. We are loyal soldiers of the party. The party may be facing challenges nationally, but we will keep it strong in Karnataka.”

Shivakumar also said Siddaramaiah would soon visit his home for lunch or dinner — another symbolic gesture meant to underline their unity.

Both leaders later posted on social media describing the breakfast meeting as “productive” and focused on “Karnataka’s priorities.”

The BJP, however, rejected the show of camaraderie as “pure bunkum,” accusing Congress of trying to paper over an internal power struggle. But Siddaramaiah and Shivakumar insisted their united front would continue — and that there was “no confusion” within the state leadership.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
December 4,2025

Udupi: A 40-year-old NRI from Udupi has reportedly lost more than Rs 12.25 lakh in an online investment scam operated through Telegram.

According to a complaint filed at the CEN police station, Leo Jerome Mendonsa, who has been working in Dubai for the past 15 years in computer accessories sales, maintains NRI accounts in Karkala and Nitte.

On November 12, 2025, Mendonsa was added to a Telegram group called Instaflow Earnings by unknown individuals. Users identified as Priya and Dipannita persuaded him to invest in “Revenue Tasks.” Initially, Mendonsa transferred Rs 1,100 multiple times and received the promised returns, encouraging him to continue.

On November 14, another user, Nishmitha Shetty, directed him to register on a website, digitvisionuoce.cc, and invest Rs 4 lakh in various shares. Over the next few days, he made multiple transfers totaling Rs 12,25,000, including Rs 50,000 via Google Pay, believing the scheme was legitimate.

After receiving the money, the alleged handlers stopped responding, and neither the invested amount nor the promised profits were returned.

The CEN police have registered a case under Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the IT Act and Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), and investigations are ongoing.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.