Mescom's proposed revision of power tariff sparks outcry

September 19, 2011

MS_2

Mangalore, September 20: People from Dakshina Kannada, Udupi, Chikmaglur and Shimoga districts flayed Mangalore Electricity Supply Company's proposed hike in tariff rate during the public hearing on Monday.

A delegation of the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission held a hearing in the office of the Deputy Commissioner to record the objections of people to Mescom's proposed hike in tariff rates citing revenue deficits.

Advisor to the KERC and member of the Bharatiya Kisan Sangha B. Sathyanarayana Udupa questioned the need for raising the power tariff. He said that during the last year, Mescom had purchased 500 million units of power but had not consumed them. If the cost of this was subtracted from its expenditure, Mescom's balance sheet would show profit and not loss, he said.

He also said that Mescom should base its proposal on audited accounts and not provisional accounts as it had done. Bangalore-based advocate Shridhar Prabhu said that the commission itself had raised preliminary objections to the proposal, but Mescom had not circulated the amended copy of the proposal. He said that accounts should be audited.

When Mr. Prabhu too raised the matter of the 500 million units that were “not consumed”, President of the commission Shrinivas Murthy said that the commission would take cognisance of it and do what could be done about it. Representatives of the Federation of Karnataka Chambers of Commerce and Industry, Kanara Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Karnataka Small Scale Industries Association, Kanara Small Industries Association and District Small Industries Association opposed the hike.

An old man who did not introduce himself said that Mescom was obtaining loans at interest rates of around 12 or 13 per cent, and passing the burden on to the consumer. This should be stopped, he said.

Ashok Kumar, an ice-factory owner said that the subsidy which had been announced for ice-factory and cold storage firms five years ago had come only during the first year. As many as 180 firms in the three coastal districts had not received the subsidy for the last four years, he said. Mr. Murthy directed Mescom to deal with the issue immediately.

K.N. Venkatagiri Rao from Sagar Balakedarara Vedike pointed out that despite Mescom stating that it was running up a deficit of around 72 paisa per unit, it had proposed to hike the fares by 88 paisa. According to Section 61(f) of the Electricity Act 2003, multi-year tariff introduced in 2010 should continue until 2013. Therefore, raising the tariff at this juncture was against the Act, he said.

One Mr. Anil from the Karnataka Planters' Association in Chikmaglur requested that cultivation of Robusta coffee be treated as seasonal industry as irrigation pump sets were used only for six weeks a year and only when the rains were insufficient.

At the end of the hearing Mr. Murthy told the media that the commission would arrive at a decision by mid-October. Replying to a question he said that the commission would protect the interest of both the escoms as well as the people.


MS_1

MS_3

MS_4

MS_5

MS_6

MS_7

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
January 20,2026

DGP.jpg

Karnataka DGP (Civil Rights Enforcement) K Ramachandra Rao was suspended with immediate effect, as per a state government order issued on Monday, 19 January. The order cited conduct unbecoming of a government servant and causing embarrassment to the state administration.

The Karnataka government suspended Rao after a purported video showed him in a compromising position with a woman inside his official chamber. The video went viral on social media. Rao rejected the videos outright, terming them "fabricated and false".

Who is K Ramachandra Rao?

Rao is a DGP-rank officer who was heading the Directorate of Civil Rights Enforcement until his suspension. He was promoted to DGP in September 2023 and assumed office in October 2023, the Sunday Guardian reported.

He also served as the Chairman and Managing Director of the Karnataka State Police Housing and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited.

His stint as the Inspector General of Police (IGP) for the Southern Range was also marred by controversy. In 2014, during a cash seizure near Mysuru’s Yelwal, officials claimed the seized amount was ₹20 lakh, while the accused (Kerala-based merchants) claimed it was around ₹2.27 crore.

Rao, who was present during the seizure, denied all allegations. However, he was transferred soon after.

Allegations of collusion with a businessman surfaced, and a senior police officer was quoted by The Sunday Guardian as saying, “In Rao’s case, the CID has clearly mentioned that there was a great degree of lapse on the part of Rao and a deputy superintendent of police after it was brought to their notice that a few policemen, including a gunman attached to the IGP, were involved in the robbery.”

Rao had denied all wrongdoing in that incident. Despite past controversies, he rose to the state’s top police position, the Sunday Guardian reported.

Ranya Rao’s stepfather

Rao is the stepfather of Kannada actress Harshavardhini Ranya alias Ranya Rao, accused of orchestrating the illegal import of gold worth over ₹12.56 crore from Dubai to India along with two others — businessman Tarun Raju, and jewellery dealer Sahil Jain.

‘Obscene video’ controversy

A viral video showed Rao behaving inappropriately with a woman inside his office while in uniform.

The Karnataka government said in its Monday order that “vide videos and news reports widely broadcast on public news channels and media platforms, it is observed that Dr K Ramachandra Rao has acted in an obscene manner which is unbecoming of a Government Servant and also causing embarrassment to the Government.”

The order said the matter was examined by the state government, which found that the officer's conduct amounted to a violation of Rule 3 of the All India Services (Conduct) Rules, 1968.

The government said it is prima facie satisfied that "it is necessary to place Rao under suspension with immediate effect, pending inquiry".

During the suspension period, Rao will be entitled to subsistence allowance as per Rule 4 of the All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969.

The order also places restrictions on his movement, stating that during the period of suspension, the officer must not leave headquarters under any circumstances without the written permission of the state government.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.