A nostalgic reunion of Canara College alumni after 25 years: 1987 BCom batch rewinds clock

[email protected] (Media Release)
December 29, 2011

Mangalore, December 29: The 1987 batch of B Com students of Canara College came together recently, in the portals of their college in a get together organised by them for the first time in 25 years after they had graduated from the college.

It was momentous and joyous occasion for a batch of 80 students out of whom 66 attended the get together and recalled the good old memories of their student days.

Putting together 66 students who are scattered in different parts of the globe called coordinated and determined efforts and batch mate A Badrinath Kamath who was the then Union Council Secretary of the college and his team worked with a resolute mind to gather the batch mates and succeeded to a great extent. Many of them had come for the purpose of this reunion on a short holiday from US and other gulf countries.

For all of them it was once again back to college days and such an atmosphere was recreated in the college. On December 25, at 9.30 am all the students assembled at the college campus for breakfast. The function started with the hoisting of national flag and by garlanding the bust of the founder of the college Ammembal Subba Rao Pai.

The students of yesteryear sat in the same class and in the same seats (as much as possible) and Prof Sathish Bhat gave the entire class a nostalgic feeling by calling out attendance and by giving a mock lecture.

The highlight of the event was that a 10 feet cake was cut by all the 66 students to mark the occasion. A Badrinath Kamath, who was instrumental in coordinating the event with active support from a few other batch mates, termed it as “a wonderful experience” to come together after a gap of 25 years. “In these 25 years all of us have undergone marvelous changes and one or two of our classmates are all set to get their children married within a short period”, he opined.

The reunited students took the opportunity to felicitate their teachers as both college and pre-university lecturers and even retired lecturers were also invited for the get together.

Having re-lived the moments of their college days the 'students' disbursed after lunch to meet once again in the evening at “Ocean Pearl” for a family get-together. Versatile singer Srikanth Kamath, who belongs to the same batch, provided a perfect milieu for the evening family gathering through his orchestra. Principal of the college Dr G N Bhat speaking on the occasion appreciated the students for the success they have achieved in their career and in different walks of life. He recalled the indelible mark left by this batch by setting up a garden, the precedent they have set by celebrating Sharada Pooja at College and the social service they rendered by their active participation in National Social service.

On the occasion the reunited students of the batch decided to institute two scholarships in the name of the 1987 batch to two meritorious and needy students of the college. The classmates who collected the email IDs and mobile numbers of their batch mates disbursed after dinner but with a promise to be in touch and to meet again. Badrinath Kamath thanked all his batch mates for making it an enlivening and memorable event.

SCR_DC29_2

SCR_DC29_1

SCR_DC29_3

SCR_DC29_4

SCR_DC29_5

SCR_DC29_6

SCR_DC29_7

SCR_DC29_8

SCR_DC29_9

SCR_DC29_10

SCR_DC29_11

SCR_DC29_13

SCR_DC29_14

SCR_DC29_15

SCR_DC29_16

SCR_DC29_17

SCR_DC29_18

SCR_DC29_19

SCR_DC29_20

SCR_DC29_21

SCR_DC29_22

SCR_DC29_23

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 1,2026

Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash an investigation against a WhatsApp group administrator accused of allowing the circulation of obscene and offensive images depicting Hindutva politicians and idols in 2021.

Justice M Nagaprasanna observed that, prima facie, the ingredients of the offence under Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code were made out. “The offence under Section 295A of the IPC is met to every word of its ingredient, albeit prima facie,” the judge said.

The petitioner, Sirajuddin, a resident of Belthangady taluk in Dakshina Kannada district, had challenged the FIR registered against him at the CEN (Cyber, Economics and Narcotics) police station, Mangaluru, for offences under Section 295A of the IPC and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act. Section 295A relates to punishment for deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage the religious feelings of any class of citizens.

According to the complaint filed by K Jayaraj Salian, also a resident of Belthangady taluk, he received a WhatsApp group link from an unknown source and was added to the group after accessing it. The group reportedly had six administrators and around 250 participants, where obscene and offensive images depicting Hindu deities and certain political figures were allegedly circulated repeatedly.

Sirajuddin was arrested in connection with the case and later released on bail on February 16, 2021. He argued before the court that he was being selectively targeted, while other administrators—including the creator of the group—were neither arrested nor investigated. He also contended that the Magistrate could not have taken cognisance of the offence under Section 295A without prior sanction under Section 196(1) of the CrPC.

Rejecting the argument, Justice Nagaprasanna held that prior sanction is required only at the stage of taking cognisance, and not at the stage of registration of the crime or during investigation.

The judge noted that the State had produced the entire investigation material before the court. “A perusal of the material reveals depictions of Hindu deities in an extraordinarily obscene, demeaning and profane manner. The content is such that its reproduction in a judicial order would itself be inappropriate,” the court said, adding that the material, on its face, had the tendency to outrage religious feelings and disturb communal harmony.

Observing that the case was still at the investigation stage, the court said it could not interdict the probe at this juncture. However, it expressed concern that the investigating officer appeared to have not proceeded uniformly against all administrators. The court clarified that if the investigation revealed the active involvement of any member in permitting the circulation of such content, they must also be proceeded against.

“At this investigative stage, any further observation by this Court would be unnecessary,” the order concluded.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.