Lokayukta row: Governor- CM slugfest continues, both refuse to budge

January 4, 2012

CM_I4Jan_7

Mangalore/Mysore, January 4: The Lok Ayukta crisis shows no sign of ending any time soon as both Governor HR. Bhardwaj and Chief Minister DV Sadananda Gowda on Wednesday refusing to lower their guard on the issue.

Speaking to reporters in Mangalore Mr. Gowda said he would take up the matter of Justice SR Bannurmath's appointment with the governor once again and try to clear the 'confusion' in the Governor's mind over the issue.

“Bannurmath's name is final for the Lok Ayukta post and there will not be any change,” Gowda said and added that he would recommend his name once again. “I will try to convince him (Governor),” he added.

Governor Bhardwaj has twice rejected Bannurmath's name for the post.

“Nothing is impossible and we are very sure we will manage to convince the governor,” Gowda said.

Earlier in the day, Mr. Bhardwaj, speaking to reporters in Mysore, said that he would not accept the name of Bannurmath's for the Lokayukta's post.

“I am not going to budge. Let him recommend some other name. I will definitely give the go-ahead,” Mr. Bhardwaj said.

The Governor, who had raised quite a few eyebrows earlier for his potshots against former chief minister B.S. Yeddyurappa, surprisingly had a word of praise for the present incumbent. “He (Gowda) is doing a good job as chief minister,” Mr. Bhardwaj said.

The appointment row had started in November when Gowda recommended the former Kerala high court chief justice's name to take over as the new ombudsman.

Mr. Bhardwaj rejected it since Bannurmath's name had cropped up in several controversies. Bannurmath faced allegations of securing the allotment of a residential site in violation of rules.

The governor rejected the recommendation a second time after Gowda once again sent the file with Bannurmath's name a few days ago.

Mr. Bhardwaj told the government that it was not difficult to find a non-controversial judge and suggested that they “Google search for better names”.

Mr. Bhardwaj had said that if the government suggested the name of a non-controversial judge, he would approve the appointment without delay.

The Lok Ayukta's post in the state has been lying vacant since September when the previous incumbent, Shivaraj Patil, quit amid charges of securing the allotment of a site in his wife's name from a private housing cooperative society in violations of rules.

Mr. Gowda said the state government would convene a 10-day legislature session in January, for which he held discussions with former chief minister BS Yeddyurappa,BJP state president KS Eshwarappa and opposition leader Siddaramaiah.

“I discussed with them various issues that will be taken up for discussions in the session,” he said, adding that the budget will be presented in March.

Shoba's Delhi visit:

Meanwhile, reacting to Power Minister Shobha Karandlaje's Delhi visit, during which she held parleys with the BJP national president Nitin Gadkari, Mr. Gowda said there was nothing wrong in ministers meeting the national-level leaders.

“It was a courtesy call. Every minister who visits New Delhi generally meets up with national president or other top leaders and discusses things related to their ministry. There is nothing wrong in that. Shobha must also have done that. There is no need to attach any significance to the meeting,” he told reporters in reply to a query.

“It is obvious that in the present political situation, the meeting was sought to be portrayed in a different light,” he added.

Ms. Karandlaje, a known B.S. Yeddyurappa loyalist, had dashed to Delhi on Tuesday amidst deepening fissures between the former chief minister and the party State president K.S. Eshwarappa.

The state BJP has plunged into a deep crisis following a sensational revelation by Mr. Yeddyurappa that Mr. Eshwarappa was responsible for him being sent to jail. He had also blasted Mr. Eshwarappa for converting BJP into his fortress.

CM_I4Jan_2

CM_I4Jan_3

CM_I4Jan_4

CM_I4Jan_5

CM_I4Jan_6

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 1,2026

Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash an investigation against a WhatsApp group administrator accused of allowing the circulation of obscene and offensive images depicting Hindutva politicians and idols in 2021.

Justice M Nagaprasanna observed that, prima facie, the ingredients of the offence under Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code were made out. “The offence under Section 295A of the IPC is met to every word of its ingredient, albeit prima facie,” the judge said.

The petitioner, Sirajuddin, a resident of Belthangady taluk in Dakshina Kannada district, had challenged the FIR registered against him at the CEN (Cyber, Economics and Narcotics) police station, Mangaluru, for offences under Section 295A of the IPC and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act. Section 295A relates to punishment for deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage the religious feelings of any class of citizens.

According to the complaint filed by K Jayaraj Salian, also a resident of Belthangady taluk, he received a WhatsApp group link from an unknown source and was added to the group after accessing it. The group reportedly had six administrators and around 250 participants, where obscene and offensive images depicting Hindu deities and certain political figures were allegedly circulated repeatedly.

Sirajuddin was arrested in connection with the case and later released on bail on February 16, 2021. He argued before the court that he was being selectively targeted, while other administrators—including the creator of the group—were neither arrested nor investigated. He also contended that the Magistrate could not have taken cognisance of the offence under Section 295A without prior sanction under Section 196(1) of the CrPC.

Rejecting the argument, Justice Nagaprasanna held that prior sanction is required only at the stage of taking cognisance, and not at the stage of registration of the crime or during investigation.

The judge noted that the State had produced the entire investigation material before the court. “A perusal of the material reveals depictions of Hindu deities in an extraordinarily obscene, demeaning and profane manner. The content is such that its reproduction in a judicial order would itself be inappropriate,” the court said, adding that the material, on its face, had the tendency to outrage religious feelings and disturb communal harmony.

Observing that the case was still at the investigation stage, the court said it could not interdict the probe at this juncture. However, it expressed concern that the investigating officer appeared to have not proceeded uniformly against all administrators. The court clarified that if the investigation revealed the active involvement of any member in permitting the circulation of such content, they must also be proceeded against.

“At this investigative stage, any further observation by this Court would be unnecessary,” the order concluded.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.