Porngate: Police say case against Palemar, two others not maintainable

[email protected] (CD Network)
February 15, 2012

porngate_copy


Bangalore, February 15: The police on Wednesday filed an affidavit before a local court stating a private complaint lodged on the recent porngate scandal involving three former BJP ministers including Krishina J Palemar inside the assembly was “not maintainable“.

The complaint filed by advocate Dharmapal Gowda was “not maintainable” as the complainant had not taken any permission from the Speaker of Legislative Assembly before filing it, Vidhana Soudha police said in their affidavit before the Additional City Metropolitan Magistrate court judge Kiran Kini.

Since the incident took place inside the Assembly hall and all the three former ministers are sitting MLAs, the permission of the Speaker is necessary and mandatory, they submitted.

Since the permission of the Speaker had not been sought, the complaint is “not maintainable”, they said.

On February 13, acting on a private complaint filed by Gowda, the ACMM court had ordered the sub—inspector of Vidhana Soudha (State Secretariat) Police Station to investigate and submit a report into the incident by February 27.

Speaker Bopaiah had last week served the notices to former ministers Lakshman Savadi, C C Patil and Krishna Palemar seeking their replies after they were caught last week on TV cameras watching a sleazy video on a mobile phone in the Assembly. The disgraced BJP members had sought one week's time to reply.

The porngate issue rocked both the houses resulting in these adjourning sine die


Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com news network
February 5,2026

protestkerala.jpg

Mangaluru: The KSRTC Mangaluru division has rolled back the fare hike on buses operating on the Mangaluru–Kasaragod route following the suspension of toll collection at the Arikkady toll plaza near Kumbala in Kasaragod district.

The fare revision had been implemented after the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) began toll collection at the Arikkady plaza on NH-66. As a result, fares for ordinary and Rajahamsa services were increased by ₹7 and ₹10, respectively, raising the bus fare from Mangaluru to Kasaragod from ₹81 to ₹88.

Senior Divisional Controller of KSRTC’s Mangaluru division, Rajesh Shetty, said the fares were reduced after toll collection at the Arikkady plaza was stopped. “The tollgate began operations on January 13, and the toll amount was deducted from the FASTag accounts of KSRTC buses operating on the route. Following an order from the central government to suspend toll collection, KSRTC has also withdrawn the additional fare with immediate effect,” he said.

At present, vehicles travelling on the Mangaluru–Kasaragod route pay toll only at the Talapady toll plaza. The toll for light motor vehicles (LMVs) at Talapady is ₹80 for a same-day return, while heavy vehicles, including buses, are charged ₹250. At Arikkady, the toll rates were ₹130 for LMVs (same-day return) and ₹450 for buses.

Protests against Arikkady toll plaza

The Arikkady toll plaza witnessed widespread protests from January 12, the day toll collection commenced. On the second day, an action committee led by Manjeshwar MLA A K M Ashraf launched an indefinite protest at the site. Except for the BJP, leaders and workers of most major political parties participated in the agitation.

On the night of January 14, a large number of protesters gathered at the plaza and vandalised property, following which authorities temporarily suspended toll operations. The BJP later also expressed opposition to the toll plaza and criticised NHAI’s decision. 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.