Bangalore: Journalists attacked by lawyers at court premises

[email protected] (CD Network)
March 2, 2012

Suvarna0

Bangalore, March 2: An incident of media persons representing a private Kannada TV news channel being attacked by lawyers took place at the City Civil Court premises in Bangalore on Friday.

The lawyers reportedly barred the entry of journalists to the City Civil Court complex saying the media portrayed them in bad light. The incident happened just after former BJP leader Janardhan Reddy was produced in court in connection with the illegal mining case.

Witnesses said that the lawyers threw stones and bottles at the mediapersons. Even policemen, who arrived on the scene to control the situation, were not spared. DCP of Bangalore Central G Ramesh was reportedly injured during the attack. He has been shifted to a hospital.

The lawyers were reportedly upset with the media over its questioning a road blockade by protesting lawyers earlier this year.

Ex-Karnataka Lokayukta Santosh Hegde however condemned the incident. He said, "It is sad that people in a noble profession are involved in such activities. I condemn the act of the lawyers. This should be severely dealt by law."

Cameramen Anith, Nagesh and reporter Ravi of Suvarna News were attacked by lawyers at the court premises when they along with other media persons were engaged in bringing live telecast of Janardhana Reddy's expected appearance for a hearing.

The concerned channel has even reported that its cameras and OB van have been damaged due to the incident. A confrontation between media persons, police and lawyers also took place at the spot giving way to chaos and confusion.

Following the incident, media persons representing other media also sat down in protest of the behaviour displayed by the representatives of law. The police, who reportedly, watched helplessly as lawyers went on a rampage, subsequently brought the situation under control by resorting to lathicharge and even fired a few rounds in the air. DCP Ramesh was also reportedly injured in the stone-throwing by the lawyers.

When asked about the incident, Chief Minister D.V. Sadananda Gowda feigned ignorance. "I don't know. I don't have any information. I will ask Law Minister Suresh Kumar," he told journalists before proceeding in his car.

Reacting to the incident, Y.S. V. Datta, spokesman of the JD(S) said: “Such incidents will not bring respect to anyone. The Govenrment should convene a meeting of representatives of the media and bar and put an end to the unsavoury saga”.

On reports that a lawyer who is part of the legal team of Kumaraswamy was also involved in the incident, Mr. Datta said, “it was not proper to give a political colour to the episode. The lawyers are a community of their own. They may have allegiance to certain political parties, but they work independently when it comes to discharging their duties as professionals,” he said.

“Lawyers are supposed to be thorough on legal affairs. They should have something to say about the incidents. But, it is the responsibility of the government to make sure that the police, the lawyers and the media perform their duties without intervening in each others' duty,” he said.

Reacting to the episode, Suresh Kumar, the Law Minister, said he was pained by the turn of events. “I am away in Mysore. I am yet to get complete information about the incident. But it is not proper to paint all the lawyers in one brush,” he said.

He also hinted that the government would soon convene a meeting of all the stake-holders to find a permanent solution to the issue. “I had proposed to convene a meeting of the representatives of the police, the media and the lawyers after a protest by lawyers led to traffic disruption for over seven hours in Majestic area some time ago. Now, it is high time that such a meeting is organized. The government will definitely not spare the guilty,” he said.

Home Minister R. Ashok reportedly disconnected the call while talking to the "Suvarna TV" channel.

Meanwhile, prohibitory orders have been imposed outside the court premises. Home Minister P Chidambaram has called for a meeting with Karnataka Chief Minister Sadananda Gowda, the court officials and the media.

Suvarna

Suvarna1

Suvarna2

Suvarna3


Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 4,2026

shettigar.jpg

An Indian resident who won the Dh20 million (approximately Rs 50 crore) jackpot in Abu Dhabi's Big Ticket draw has told of his joy at sharing his life-changing fortune with a friend.

Shanthanu Shettigar, a shop manager in Muscat, regularly buys tickets for the monthly grand prize draw with one of his closest friends – and the pair won on February 3.

Mr Shettigar, 33, who is from Udyavar in Udupi district of the southern state of Karnataka and has lived in the Omani capital for eight years, said he was left speechless after learning of his success.

“When I first moved to Muscat, many of my colleagues were purchasing Big Ticket, which encouraged me to give it a try,” he said.

“I started buying tickets on my own, and later began sharing tickets with a close friend. The ticket that brought me this win was one we purchased together.”

“Like most people, I receive a lot of spam calls, and I was fully absorbed in my work as well. I knew the live draw was taking place tonight, but I never imagined my name would be announced,” he said.

“When I realised it was real and that I had won, I was honestly speechless. It still hasn’t fully sunk in, but I’m extremely happy.”

Mr Shettigar is not sure how he will spend his share of the money, but encouraged others to take part.

“This win was completely unexpected, so I want to take some time to think things through before deciding what to do next,” he said.

“I would definitely encourage others to participate with Big Ticket, whether with family or friends – you never know when your moment might come.”

The Big Ticket was established in 1992 with an initial first prize of Dh1 million. It is one of the most popular monthly raffles in the UAE.

It has transformed the lives of many people across the Emirates and beyond.

Entry to the Big Ticket Millionaire is Dh500. Tickets can be bought online or at counters at Zayed International Airport and Al Ain Airport.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 3,2026

Bengaluru: Following reports of fresh Nipah virus (NiV) cases in West Bengal and heightened vigilance across parts of Southeast Asia, the Karnataka Health Department has placed the state on high alert and activated emergency preparedness protocols.

Health officials said enhanced surveillance measures have been initiated after two healthcare workers in Barasat, West Bengal, tested positive for the virus earlier this month. While no cases have been reported in Karnataka so far, authorities said the state’s past exposure to Nipah outbreaks and high inter-state mobility warranted preventive action.

Officials have directed district health teams to intensify monitoring, particularly at hospitals and points of entry, and to ensure early detection and isolation of suspected cases.

High Mortality Virus with Multiple Transmission Routes

Nipah virus is a zoonotic disease that can spread from animals to humans and has a reported fatality rate ranging between 60 and 75 per cent. Fruit bats, also known as flying foxes, are the natural reservoirs of the virus and can transmit it by contaminating food sources with saliva or urine.

Known modes of transmission include:

•    Contaminated food: Consumption of fruits partially eaten by bats or raw date-palm sap
•    Animal contact: Exposure to infected pigs or other animals
•    Human-to-human transmission: Close contact with body fluids of infected persons, particularly in healthcare settings

Symptoms and Disease Progression

The incubation period typically ranges from 4 to 14 days, though delayed onset has also been reported. Early symptoms often resemble common viral infections, making prompt clinical suspicion critical.

•    Initial symptoms: Fever, headache, body aches, fatigue, sore throat
•    Progressive symptoms: Drowsiness, disorientation, altered mental state
•    Severe stage: Seizures, neck stiffness and acute encephalitis, which can rapidly progress to coma

Public Health Advisory

The Health Department has issued precautionary guidelines urging the public to adopt risk-avoidance practices to prevent any local spillover.

Do’s
•    Wash fruits thoroughly before consumption
•    Drink boiled and cooled water
•    Use protective equipment while handling livestock
•    Maintain strict hand hygiene

Don’ts
•    Avoid fruits found on the ground or showing bite marks
•    Do not consume beverages made from raw tree sap, including toddy
•    Avoid areas with dense bat populations
•    Do not handle sick or dead animals

Preparedness Measures

Officials confirmed that isolation wards are being readied in major government hospitals and that medical staff are being sensitised to identify early warning signs.

“There is no cause for panic, but there is a need for heightened vigilance,” a senior health official said, adding that there is currently no approved vaccine or specific antiviral treatment for Nipah, and care remains largely supportive.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 1,2026

Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash an investigation against a WhatsApp group administrator accused of allowing the circulation of obscene and offensive images depicting Hindutva politicians and idols in 2021.

Justice M Nagaprasanna observed that, prima facie, the ingredients of the offence under Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code were made out. “The offence under Section 295A of the IPC is met to every word of its ingredient, albeit prima facie,” the judge said.

The petitioner, Sirajuddin, a resident of Belthangady taluk in Dakshina Kannada district, had challenged the FIR registered against him at the CEN (Cyber, Economics and Narcotics) police station, Mangaluru, for offences under Section 295A of the IPC and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act. Section 295A relates to punishment for deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage the religious feelings of any class of citizens.

According to the complaint filed by K Jayaraj Salian, also a resident of Belthangady taluk, he received a WhatsApp group link from an unknown source and was added to the group after accessing it. The group reportedly had six administrators and around 250 participants, where obscene and offensive images depicting Hindu deities and certain political figures were allegedly circulated repeatedly.

Sirajuddin was arrested in connection with the case and later released on bail on February 16, 2021. He argued before the court that he was being selectively targeted, while other administrators—including the creator of the group—were neither arrested nor investigated. He also contended that the Magistrate could not have taken cognisance of the offence under Section 295A without prior sanction under Section 196(1) of the CrPC.

Rejecting the argument, Justice Nagaprasanna held that prior sanction is required only at the stage of taking cognisance, and not at the stage of registration of the crime or during investigation.

The judge noted that the State had produced the entire investigation material before the court. “A perusal of the material reveals depictions of Hindu deities in an extraordinarily obscene, demeaning and profane manner. The content is such that its reproduction in a judicial order would itself be inappropriate,” the court said, adding that the material, on its face, had the tendency to outrage religious feelings and disturb communal harmony.

Observing that the case was still at the investigation stage, the court said it could not interdict the probe at this juncture. However, it expressed concern that the investigating officer appeared to have not proceeded uniformly against all administrators. The court clarified that if the investigation revealed the active involvement of any member in permitting the circulation of such content, they must also be proceeded against.

“At this investigative stage, any further observation by this Court would be unnecessary,” the order concluded.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.