Tug-of-war for 'Byari' glory: Sara Aboobaker hits out at producer

[email protected] (CD Network)
March 9, 2012
Mangalore, March 9: The controversy surrounding the authorship of the story of 'Byari' has surfaced again with noted Kannada writer Sara Aboobaker reiterating her claim that the National Award winning movie was based on her first book Chandragiri Thiradalli released in mid-80s.

The first-ever Beary film with the same title, shared the Best Feature Film award along with Marathi film Deol when the names were announced on Wednesday in New Delhi.

The film, produced by Mangalore-based producer Altaf Hussain Chokkabettu, was released in June last year with the director himself playing the lead male character.

sara

Sara, who had raised her objections during and before the release of the movie, once again reiterated her stand that the movie was based on her successful novel, which narrated the plight of a young Muslim woman who 's life was shattered by the misuse of provisions of Talaq in Islam.

“Altaf Hussain Chokkabettu, the producer of the movie had asked her for the rights of the book. “I had already signed a agreement until 2015 with the National Film Development Corporation that I would not give the story to any visual media,” she told coastaldigest.com

Despite her telling the producer of Byari that he could not use the story, in Kerala, he had declared that his film was based on her book. “He even put up posters in Mangalore saying that the story was mine,” she said. “But when I raised objections he backtracked and, claimed that the story was written by Irfan Chokabettu”.

Sara, has in fact, approached court seeking justice, but had to withdraw since she was 'disillusioned' with the legal system of the country.

“Today lawyers don't take up cases on the basis of who's right or who's wrong. They want to ascertain how influential or financially sound the other party is before taking up one's case. Even otherwise, the judicial process is riddled with inordinate delays. At 75, I was not prepared for the long haul,” says Sara.

“I still have the clippings of his (Altaf) statements published in Malayalam newspapers. I also have a poster of the movie which has my name on it. I had produced them before the court. The court had asked the defendant to produce the book supposedly written by Irfan Chokkabettu,” she said, but insisted she had withdrawn the case since she was not sure of getting justice.

When asked about the marked difference in the climax of her novel and that of the movie, she said: “When you adopt a book to the visual media, you make certain changes. It has happened with all the great works of Kannada literature. It cannot be a mere coincidence that the names of characters of the movie and that of my book are same.”

Sara is also unhappy that fellow-writers did not come out in the open to support her fight against what she called an act of blatant plagiarism. “Of course I am pained by the marked silence of my fellow writers. They should have come out in the open to fight against the injustice. Even in the Karnataka Film Chamber, except Jayamala, no one took up my cause. If this had happened in United States or some other country, people would have reacted strongly,” she says.

When asked how she felt about a debut Beary film getting a top national award, she said: “Awards are not a big thing. The movie was about one of the worst practices in our religion. The portrayal of the evil practice will definitely fetch awards. I won the award for the best story for the same novel when it was made a film in Tamil. So it was quiet expected. And you know how the awards are decided these days. Lot of lobbying and behind-the-scene maneuvering goes into it.”

Reacting to a question if she was feeling betrayed that she had been denied the credit, Mrs. Sara said: “No, not at all. I have already secured awards and accolades for my work. My books have been made the textbook in some universities. I have been bestowed honorary doctorate by three universities in Karnataka. I am saddened by the way he (Altaf) cheated me and went on to claim that he did not even know me.”

altaf

On the other hand producer Altaf Hussain refuted her claim and said the film was based on Quran and not on anyone's book.

“Just because the names of the characters are same, she cannot claim that the movie is based on her book. The movie has been created based on a real-life event. Our movie does not violate the tenets of Islam, while her book questions the Islamic customs,” he argues.

Altaf reiterated that he did not know Sara Aboobaker until the controversy broke out. “I did not know who this woman was. When I set out on the movie-making mission, I would have naturally spoken to writers in the Beary community. There are eminent writers like Boluvaru, Fakir Mohammed Katpad, Baddur who are well-versed in Beary culture and language. Sara Aboobaker does not belong to beary community. She is a Malayali. Their culture and our culture are different. So, I would not have met her even to get her advice,” he says.

Insisting that he had never spoken to the media in Trissur International Film Festival, nor printed any publicity material with her name on it, Altaf says, “the publicity material submitted by her (Sara) to the court is two years old. But we prepared the first poster only after we got the censor certificate from the concerned authorities. The movie was released in Mangalore on June 9. The only press meet we held in connection with the movie was in Mangalore on June 3.”

When asked if Irfan Chokkabettu's work has been published in the print media, he said: “Irfan is a talented writer. He has got a number of stories with him which are not published anywhere.”

Reacting sharply to Sara's criticism of plagiarism, Altaf said: “It is foolish to say that she withdrew her case because lawyers cheated her. The advancing age is clearily showing in her statements. Now that the film has won national award, she has started to blackmail us once again. But this will not succeed.”




Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 3,2026

Kanchur2.jpg

Mangaluru, Feb 3: Kanachur College of Physiotherapy and Kanachur Hospital & Research Centre, in association with U.T. Fareed Foundation (R), organised the 11th Late Mrs. Naseema Fareed Memorial Lecture on Tuesday.

The programme was inaugurated by Dr. Subramanyam K, Head of the Department and Professor, Department of Cardiology, Srinivas Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Mangaluru. In his inaugural address, Dr. Subramanyam delivered an insightful talk highlighting the vital role of physiotherapy in modern medical care, particularly in cardiac rehabilitation, patient recovery, and improving overall quality of life through a multidisciplinary healthcare approach.

The presidential address was delivered by Dr. Haji U.K. Monu, Chairman, KIET. The keynote address was presented by Dr. Mohammed Ismail Hejamady, who spoke on the evolving scope and significance of physiotherapy.

The event was held in the presence of Mr. Abdul Rahiman, Director, Kanachur Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangaluru; Dr. Vaishali Sreejith, Senate Member, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bengaluru; Dr. Sudhan S.G., Professor and Principal, Krupanidhi College of Physiotherapy, Bengaluru; Dr. Shanavaz Manipady, Dean, Kanachur Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangaluru; and Dr. Venkat Rai Prabhu, Member, Kanachur Health Science Advisory Council, Kanachur Hospital & Research Centre.

Dr. Mohammad Suhail, Dean, Kanachur College of Physiotherapy, welcomed the guests and delegates.

As part of the programme, a two-day free workshop was organised on the following topics:

•    Art of Practice in Cardiopulmonary Conditions by Dr. Sudhan S.G., Principal, Krupanidhi College of Physiotherapy

•    The Gift of Life – Organ Donation by Dr. Rohan Monis, Chief Administrative Medical Officer

•    Chest X-ray Interpretation by Dr. Hemanth, Department of Radiology, KIMS

•    Pulmonary Rehabilitation by Dr. Vijaya Kumar, Department of Respiratory Medicine, KIMS

Organisers noted that the memorial lecture series has been conducted continuously for the 11th year, benefiting interns and postgraduate students from various colleges across Mangaluru. A total of 130 delegates attended the workshop.

Dr. Reshma, Vice Principal, Kanachur College of Physiotherapy, Mangaluru, delivered the vote of thanks.

Kanchur7.jpg

Kanchur6.jpg

Kanchur5.jpg

Kanchur4.jpg

Kanchur3.jpg

Kanchur1.jpg

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
February 1,2026

Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash an investigation against a WhatsApp group administrator accused of allowing the circulation of obscene and offensive images depicting Hindutva politicians and idols in 2021.

Justice M Nagaprasanna observed that, prima facie, the ingredients of the offence under Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code were made out. “The offence under Section 295A of the IPC is met to every word of its ingredient, albeit prima facie,” the judge said.

The petitioner, Sirajuddin, a resident of Belthangady taluk in Dakshina Kannada district, had challenged the FIR registered against him at the CEN (Cyber, Economics and Narcotics) police station, Mangaluru, for offences under Section 295A of the IPC and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act. Section 295A relates to punishment for deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage the religious feelings of any class of citizens.

According to the complaint filed by K Jayaraj Salian, also a resident of Belthangady taluk, he received a WhatsApp group link from an unknown source and was added to the group after accessing it. The group reportedly had six administrators and around 250 participants, where obscene and offensive images depicting Hindu deities and certain political figures were allegedly circulated repeatedly.

Sirajuddin was arrested in connection with the case and later released on bail on February 16, 2021. He argued before the court that he was being selectively targeted, while other administrators—including the creator of the group—were neither arrested nor investigated. He also contended that the Magistrate could not have taken cognisance of the offence under Section 295A without prior sanction under Section 196(1) of the CrPC.

Rejecting the argument, Justice Nagaprasanna held that prior sanction is required only at the stage of taking cognisance, and not at the stage of registration of the crime or during investigation.

The judge noted that the State had produced the entire investigation material before the court. “A perusal of the material reveals depictions of Hindu deities in an extraordinarily obscene, demeaning and profane manner. The content is such that its reproduction in a judicial order would itself be inappropriate,” the court said, adding that the material, on its face, had the tendency to outrage religious feelings and disturb communal harmony.

Observing that the case was still at the investigation stage, the court said it could not interdict the probe at this juncture. However, it expressed concern that the investigating officer appeared to have not proceeded uniformly against all administrators. The court clarified that if the investigation revealed the active involvement of any member in permitting the circulation of such content, they must also be proceeded against.

“At this investigative stage, any further observation by this Court would be unnecessary,” the order concluded.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
coastaldigest.com news network
February 5,2026

protestkerala.jpg

Mangaluru: The KSRTC Mangaluru division has rolled back the fare hike on buses operating on the Mangaluru–Kasaragod route following the suspension of toll collection at the Arikkady toll plaza near Kumbala in Kasaragod district.

The fare revision had been implemented after the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) began toll collection at the Arikkady plaza on NH-66. As a result, fares for ordinary and Rajahamsa services were increased by ₹7 and ₹10, respectively, raising the bus fare from Mangaluru to Kasaragod from ₹81 to ₹88.

Senior Divisional Controller of KSRTC’s Mangaluru division, Rajesh Shetty, said the fares were reduced after toll collection at the Arikkady plaza was stopped. “The tollgate began operations on January 13, and the toll amount was deducted from the FASTag accounts of KSRTC buses operating on the route. Following an order from the central government to suspend toll collection, KSRTC has also withdrawn the additional fare with immediate effect,” he said.

At present, vehicles travelling on the Mangaluru–Kasaragod route pay toll only at the Talapady toll plaza. The toll for light motor vehicles (LMVs) at Talapady is ₹80 for a same-day return, while heavy vehicles, including buses, are charged ₹250. At Arikkady, the toll rates were ₹130 for LMVs (same-day return) and ₹450 for buses.

Protests against Arikkady toll plaza

The Arikkady toll plaza witnessed widespread protests from January 12, the day toll collection commenced. On the second day, an action committee led by Manjeshwar MLA A K M Ashraf launched an indefinite protest at the site. Except for the BJP, leaders and workers of most major political parties participated in the agitation.

On the night of January 14, a large number of protesters gathered at the plaza and vandalised property, following which authorities temporarily suspended toll operations. The BJP later also expressed opposition to the toll plaza and criticised NHAI’s decision. 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.